Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC, Thailand: Brown Receiver; Composite or Trick of Light on M-16?
Gun Watch ^ | 26 May, 2015 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 05/28/2015 9:39:47 AM PDT by marktwain




My nephew, Nick, had a BBC newscast on about human smugglers in Thailand.  It appears that the BBC is a bit less shy about showing weapons than many U.S. outlets, but that could simply be perception on this one show.  I watch very little TV.    From BBC.com:

Manit told us his district had long been used by human traffickers to transfer migrants from boats to trucks. He wanted to stamp it out. But he was getting little help from the central government, or from local law enforcement.
 The BBC correspondent was allowed to join a patrol off the coast.  In the video we see what appears to be an M-16A2 with a composite receiver.  If you look at the closeup of the receiver, it does not appear to be aluminum, but maybe it is just a trick of the lighting. 


 

Could it be that the lower receiver is a very worn lower that was cannibalized from another rifle?  The wear on the reinforcing seem typical of a worn receiver, but the color does not look  like the color of the upper receiver or magazine, or for that matter, like aluminum with the anodizing worn off.

A retired Marine friend tells me that some of the early M16 receivers turned brown with hard use, because he had one that had done so.  That is likely what we are seeing in this picture.   A very early, worn receiver that has turned to a brown tint, rather than a stray composite receiver.  

I do not know of any military that uses composite receivers for the M16 and its variants, but I would be happy to be educated.

The bright flotation devices indicate that no firefights are anticipated.  I suspect that the color is closer to orange than pink, so there may be some color distortion in the screen shots.

©2015 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch 


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; lowerreceiver; m16; thailand
Has anyone else come across early M-16/ AR-15 receivers that wore/faded to a brownish tint?
1 posted on 05/28/2015 9:39:47 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I’m still trying to figure out if the dress is blue or black.


2 posted on 05/28/2015 10:00:12 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

That is simply a lower receiver completely worn of any finish.


3 posted on 05/28/2015 10:11:11 AM PDT by 762X51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I don’t know about that, but I saw another post showing this rifle with the compensator vents facing down. Improperly installed.


4 posted on 05/28/2015 10:24:34 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

That was a different rifle, but from the same BBC story.


5 posted on 05/28/2015 11:08:38 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Has anyone else come across early M-16/ AR-15 receivers that wore/faded to a brownish tint?

When I worked at NWSC Crane in the early 1980s, we reworked some 25,000 very well-worn former USMC M16A1 rifles and refinished the lower receivers with a high-temperature, high-adhesion graphite-based finish. After a year or so of being repeatedly oiled [especially if 2-cycle oil or transmission fluid was used] they did indeed pick up a muddy chocolate colouration.

That rifle in the pic's fairly interesting because it's an early M16A1 [or XM16!] lower receiver upgraded with the heavier barreled M16A2 type upper. It could be that the user has a source of M855 ammo meant for the M16A2/M4 [which doesn't work too well in the 1:12 twist barrel of the M16A1/XM177E2] or it could simply be that the original barrel either wore out or got bent.

My AMVETS post has two unanodized M4s with VERY shiny lowers, and to which I've fitted 10-inch stainless steel bayonets- all for parade duty for our honour guard. The rifle in the pic hasn't been so polished, but looks to be a pretty good match for magazines that have lost their protective coating after a decade or two of use.


6 posted on 05/28/2015 11:20:06 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Has anyone else come across early M-16/ AR-15 receivers that wore/faded to a brownish tint?

That's obviously an extremely used weapon and over it's lifetime who knows what abuse it's seen..........

I don't think they would care for their weapons as you and I would do with our own.......

7 posted on 05/28/2015 11:29:03 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (War IS the answer! Peace activists never liberated anything or anyone....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: archy
My retired Marine friend said his brownish lower was an XM16.

Thank you for your very informative post.

Exactly the type of expertise that freerepublic is justly famous for attracting.

8 posted on 05/28/2015 11:46:58 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I noticed your picture today had a flash suppessor.


9 posted on 05/28/2015 12:44:33 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I don’t know about that, but I saw another post showing this rifle with the compensator vents facing down. Improperly installed.

There's only one slot missing on the M16A2/M4 flash hider, to prevent vented muzzle gasses from kicking up dust when fired from the prone position. You sure that hodgepodge M16A1 lower/M16A2 upper doesn't have an M16A1 flashhider on it?

10 posted on 05/29/2015 10:42:57 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Thank you for your very informative post.

I try. The more info supplied or the better or more detailed the pics, the better the likelihood that I can at least come up with a logical or reasonable analysis or observation. Which does not necessarily mean it's correct.

11 posted on 05/29/2015 10:44:47 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: archy

The picture I saw was the same guy, but a different photo. There was no mistaking the vent on the bottom.


12 posted on 05/29/2015 11:08:04 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Maybe it was this article?

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2015/05/bbc-image-thai-muzzle-brake-on-upside.html


13 posted on 05/29/2015 3:06:35 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson