Posted on 05/05/2015 3:33:07 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Via Mediaite, this is a lame answer but not as lame as some commenters in Headlines are treating it, I think. Theyre not backing away from the Pam Geller event because theyre afraid of being targeted by jihadis. These guys will be targeted forever, whether or not they continue to blaspheme Islam, and they know it. Jean-Baptiste Thoret, the magazines film critic and the man in the glasses here, told an audience a few days ago that the surviving cartoonist who drew the Je suis Charlie cover is now a de facto prisoner with constant armed protection even though hes sworn off drawing Mohammed anymore. Tonights PEN event, where Thoret and editor Gerard Biard will receive an award, is being guarded by the NYPDs intelligence unit and a private security firm, with background checks conducted on all of the 800+ guests, simply because these two guys will be there. They gain nothing from jihadis by distinguishing themselves from Geller. Theyre still on the hit list, in perpetuity.
Whats driving them, I think, isnt fear of violent reprisal by hugging Geller but maybe some fear of class reprisals. Theyve been criticized by dozens of dopey left-wing PEN members for their racist cartoons disparaging supposedly powerless Muslims, a minority position within the literary world (I think) but one with some influential adherents. If they made a show of solidarity with Geller, a right-wing provocateur and critic of Islam whos detested by Americas political class, it would feed the idea that Charlie Hebdo is less about slaughtering sacred cows across French culture and more about being anti-Muslim. Muslims may already see them that way, but for the literati to swing around to that position would leave Charlie Hebdo with no friends except on the right a lonely place to be in a country as left-wing as France, especially for an editorial staff as left-wing as CHs. The point of this answer is to signal (a) that Charlie Hebdo aspires to something more highbrow than Gellers Muslim-baiting, even if their mode of satire is often lowbrow, and (b) they hold no special animus for Islam, their willingness to defy Islamic norms notwithstanding. All of which would be fine, except that it was literally just yesterday that Biard was grousing, justifiably, that the western world cant expect Charlie Hebdo to shoulder the load of defending free speech and the right to blaspheme alone. Well, heres Pam Geller willing to help shoulder that load, at considerable personal risk to herself. A little recognition and appreciation of that fact, at least, would have gone a long way here.
The full interview airs tonight. Well see if they manage to commend her at least for trying to help fill the void created by the same western publications that have abandoned the field to Charlie Hebdo by blacking out images of Mohammed in their own pages.
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
They just can’t help themselves, can they?
Liberalism is a Mental Illness no matter the Country.
We really need to be writing a TX planning thread, heavy on the Sun Tzu. No doubt there will be reprisals, and we need to have situ/aware and plans for every scenario. Starting yesterday.
Yet leftists are willing to afford them the right to be crazy without being offended while every other belief is subject to satire and ridicule.
This cannot stand. If ever a civil breaks out because of radical Islam, liberal apologists and abettors of violent Islam are going to find themselves subject to the same harsh penalties as the Jihadis.
They’re right. The event in Texas was a one time thing. The Hebdo folks have been publishing anti-Mulims stuff for a lot longer time than that.
Actually, that's a good point. In Texas the police were armed, and in Paris they weren't.
“The enemy of my enemy is my friend’’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.