Posted on 04/03/2015 2:33:29 PM PDT by IChing
Defenders of legislation designed to protect the religious freedom rights of businesses argue that such laws do not amount to discrimination against gays. However, not only are such advocates actually barking up the wrong tree, theyre not even in the right forest.
Instead of helping to reinforce the enemys primary premise (the idea that discrimination of any kind is wrong) while boxing themselves into legalistic corners, desperate to comply with the enemys terms, those who would overthrow the tyranny of political correctness must go on the attack instead.
How? Upset the enemys apple cart completely. Get in their faces and defiantly inform them (and everyone else concerned) that discrimination is not only moral, right, and fair; it is a patriotic imperative, and everything our population has been taught about discrimination has been false.
Whats wrong with discrimination? Nothing. In fact, you have a duty to discriminate in favor of the good, and against the inferior.
The ancient Chinese classic, The Book of Changes, holds that discrimination the setting of limits is the very backbone of morality.
Sodomy is inferior to procreation. Sue me already.
A society which makes it illegal to favor the superior over the inferior is doomed, that much more so when it requires that the inferior be favored over the superior. Now the astonishment ensues, that anyone would dare even speak of such things as superior and inferior! Such hateful bigotry! Why, theres no such thing! Everything and everyone is equal in every way!
The controversy over Christian caterers and gay weddings is only one facet of the overall, ongoing political maelstrom which necessitates clarity. I dont much care what the courts have ruled on any of this; theyre just as likely to be wrong and not just because theyve been rather dishonest about it all.
Our distorted legal system says that the fundamental right of freedom of association is somehow trumped by the imagined (and non-existent, in truth) right not to be offended or discriminated against. If peoples right to freedom of association (and private property rights) were protected instead, private business owners could just hire or serve only who they see fit, for any reason or no reason at all. And the chips would fall where they may. After all, the business operator (not the judge, leftist talk show pundit, or lawmaker) is the one who has to spend most of his or her waking hours dealing with the employees and customers in question.
Conventional thinkers and jurists argue that businesses, having an alleged orientation and obligation toward public accommodation, are by that principle forbidden from denying service to patrons based on whatever status. But how honest is that characterization, anyway? Theres really no such thing as a business which accommodates the public. In reality, businesses accommodate only those with the means and willingness to pay for the goods or services they offer. That is, discrimination against those in the general public who cant or wont pay is already inherent (although even that concept seems less and less intact anymore!). Besides, money is not the only social currency. Good manners and all kinds of other preferences can and should be considered as to a business owners prerogatives.
When you chose to read this, you discriminated against all the other articles you could be reading during this time, or other things you could be doing. Is that somehow unfair to someone? Shouldnt there be government arbiters of what people read, to make sure you dont make discriminatory selections? How would that work, seeing as discrimination against someones writing would always be inevitable? You see where this leads. Yes, they are actually trying to put such programs in place.
If discrimination is supposedly so wrong and illegal, why does our immigration system (since 1965, that is) so heavily favor non-whites from the third world, to the relative exclusion of whites?
The point is that regardless of what the do-gooders say or attempt, discrimination of some kind is always going to take place, no matter what. The important thing is that it be the right kind. Thats where the real debate comes into play.
So what is the right kind of discrimination?
Contrary to the conventional thinking, even governments should actively discriminate. The Japanese are morally right to discriminate in favor of Japanese (why shouldnt they?), and the ethnic majority in whatever country, wherever, should be free to assert itself and create laws favoring their prevalence this is the very essence and purpose of having national identity in the first place, lest the abject chaos of unlimited diversity trump borders, language, and culture. The alternative is what we see here now in the U.S.: increasing dissolution, tension, conflict, and the anti-American tyranny of protected minority sacred cows. Phooey.
Speaking of cows, next well be told that cows are unable to read and practice things like medicine only because of centuries of oppression by farmers (mostly white farmers of course), and that therefore the achievement gap is the result of the disparate impact of .oh, never mind.
Agenda-driven discrimination does not mean scuttling the rule of law, it means the rule of law is intact just not the Orwellian, Marxist BS we have now. Those who prattle on about equal protection under the law have yet to answer regarding the inevitability of discrimination Ive mentioned.
As it happens now, unfortunately, and mainly due to twisted interpretations of history and its implications, conservative white males have for generations accepted and helped perpetuate the premise that they are the ones to be targeted for discrimination by any and all entities, public and private, so that a de facto regime of black/brown/female/LGBT supremacy can reign over America. This is anything but equal protection, and its despite the fact that white males are the ones who sacrificed themselves in untold numbers to end slavery and tyranny in this hemisphere and elsewhere on the planet still, we are the ones against whom the endless political pogroms are being waged, because it is imagined that we are guilty, when in fact the entire world was guilty of slavery, yet it was whites who did something about it!
In suicidal, politically correct Britain, at least they dont pretend its not discrimination when they wage political and economic persecution against whites, and especially against Christian white males they call their affirmative action/diversity programs positive discrimination. Isnt that cute?
Efforts against shopkeepers being allowed to decide for themselves whom to serve and how to conduct their own business evidence a pretty dim view of the ability of individual citizens to exercise their own, sound moral judgment about human relations, and about business, for that matter. That control-freak impulse is at the very heart of the fascist Lefts fetish for government intrusion into peoples lives, and their growing bureaus of Thought Police. But nothing gives us any indication that such control-freaks are in reality better people, with better moral judgment, than any given store owner, any given citizen.
In fact, given the recent campaign of malicious terrorism weve seen waged against a completely innocent Christian pizza shop owner in Indiana, its pretty clear that those screaming the loudest against discrimination are actually the most hateful, dangerous bigots on the planet.
Egalitarianism is the biggest lie Marx and his roving band of madmen perpetuated. Any society that buys it is doomed to descend into tyranny to make its procrustean promises reality.
MLK helped give discriminating (freedom to choose) a bad name. But we as individuals have every constitutional right to choose and discriminate however we want.
The only constitutional limitation on choosing or discriminating is prohibition of STATE SEGREGATION laws against blacks (14th Amendment).
There is NO constitutional limitation on individual discrimination AT ALL.
As far as the feds are concerned, a state can discriminate against gays or anyone else except blacks. It is up to the citizens of each state how they want to deal with their own freedom to choose or discrimination.
This is correct and freedom of association is one of the core foundation blocks of our nation. Civil rights become tyrannical when they override individual rights. We could push to force accommodation of religious expression by everyone meaning that gay bakers would be compelled to make anti-same sex marriage and anti-gay cakes but that would be just doubling down on tyranny. The left of course like to use the “its discrimination” crap to push their ‘values’ on their opponents and to effectively shut them down. We need to push back hard. Their masks are off and they may think they have won this round but they have not. The polling data I’ve seen is showing that there is a big shift against the homofascists. The problem we have is balless Republicans.
The GoFundMe account for Memories Pizza is now up to $842,187 !!
Its awesome and its not for a politician. I actually feel better that I’ve donated more to private causes than politicians this year so far. I don’t feel nearly as disappointed or dirty.
It is truly an awesome display of the power of the internet, to rally grassroots blowback against the fudgepack terrorists
It used to be a compliment if one was "a man of discrimination" as it inferred that one was able to make good choices by choosing the best from the worst.
Now it means that one is malicious towards a certain group of people (no matter that that same group calls for one's murder because one isn't "tolerant" enough to suit them) and is a hater/menace to a polite (tightly controlled by overlords) society.
Exactly!
I agree with this.
This whole discrimination and egalitarian BS is ruining us.
Money quote. It is amazing to me how many whites, conservative whites at that, just accept this. They accept that they and their children and grandchildren should be discriminated against. That they are somehow evil and deserve it. We have become very twisted in this nation.
Anyone who dares go off script is seen as a pariah
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.