Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CT Gov. Malloy: GOP candidates who defended Indiana’s RFRA disqualified from the presidency
Hot Air ^ | 3/31/15 | NOAH ROTHMAN

Posted on 03/31/2015 1:17:29 PM PDT by rightistight

How do you know that you’ve won the argument? It’s usually when your opponent expands the scope of the issues well beyond their deliberately narrow parameters in the pursuit of more favorable terrain. Connecticut’s Gov. Dannel Malloy is desperately searching for higher ground.

On Monday, Malloy humiliated himself and his state when he imposed a ban on state-sponsored travel to Indiana in protest of that state’s Religious Freedom and Restoration Act. Unable to respond to the fact that his state also has a RFRA that is even more protective of the sensibilities of religious adherents, Malloy has taken to making even more embarrassingly overwrought comments about Indiana’s law and its repercussions.

“He got caught,” super-sleuth Malloy told CNN’s Carol Costello on Tuesday, congratulating himself for having noticed a law passed by Indiana’s legislature and signed by the state’s governor. How could these Hoosiers have been so careless?

He went on to strongly criticize Mike Pence’s judgment and political sensibilities, calling his appearance on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos “disastrous.” Malloy concluded by noting that any of the 2016 Republican candidates have been effectively disqualified from holding higher office

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016election; connecticut; danmalloy; dannelmalloy; election2016; gaystapo; hillaryclinton; hitlery; homosexualagenda; indiana; mikepence; rfra; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/31/2015 1:17:29 PM PDT by rightistight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightistight

No dissent is permitted.


2 posted on 03/31/2015 1:18:10 PM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

3 posted on 03/31/2015 1:19:21 PM PDT by red-dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
GOP candidates who defended Indiana’s RFRA disqualified from WILL BE SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED FOR the presidency
4 posted on 03/31/2015 1:19:50 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

The first amendment is now verbotten


5 posted on 03/31/2015 1:20:48 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Governor Malloy.Please shut the hell up.He only speaks for himself.Even though Connecticut is a Liberal hell hole there are still a lot of religious people here.


6 posted on 03/31/2015 1:21:11 PM PDT by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Are State Senators who voted for these laws disqualified from the Presidency?


7 posted on 03/31/2015 1:22:04 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

What is Governor Stupid from Connecticut going to d about his RFRA law that has been passed and in place today. Should he resign?


8 posted on 03/31/2015 1:23:23 PM PDT by Kozy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Yup. Malloy and the left have lost this argument just like they have been losing all of the other gay marriage fights over the last few years. /s


9 posted on 03/31/2015 1:23:29 PM PDT by Menthops (If you are reading this..... the GOPe hates you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Yeah; that kind of rhetoric will sure encourage Ruger, Stag, PTR, Colt, Mossberg et al to move back to CT.


10 posted on 03/31/2015 1:25:00 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menthops

How many battles did Adolf win before he ultimately lost the war?


11 posted on 03/31/2015 1:25:34 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

What next, if a politician admits Christian faith that also disqualifies him/her ???


12 posted on 03/31/2015 1:27:21 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

13 posted on 03/31/2015 1:30:34 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kozy

that would be appropriate IMO


14 posted on 03/31/2015 1:31:57 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rightistight; All
What we’re probably not going to hear from pro-gay activist justices anytime soon is this. Unprotected gay rights versus constitutionally enumerated religious expression protection issues are becoming a litmus test for finding out which government “leaders” have actually read the Constitution that they have sworn to protect and defend, and those who have not.
14th Amendment, Section 1:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Unlike those pro-gay activist states which have already unthinkingly violated Section 1 of the 14th Amendment imo, the Indiana RFL actually helps Indiana to avoid violating that amendment.

On the other hand, Christians need to be careful not to be a stumbling block to those people who are wresting with slavery to same-sex sexual desires, but are nonetheless trying to seek the truth in Jesus. This is evidenced by 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 which indicates that some church members had been struggling with such desires, but had evidently accepted God’s grace to repent and turn their lives around.

15 posted on 03/31/2015 1:36:45 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight
Well, Governor, no amount of hissy fitting on your part will change the fact that the MAJORITY feel they should have the Freedom of Association guaranteed in the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

I, for one, am sick and tired of the 3% who elect to behave a certain way running roughshod over the rest of us. I know I am not alone.

16 posted on 03/31/2015 1:40:49 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

17 posted on 03/31/2015 1:43:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightistight

In 2014 there were 548,248 flatliners in Connecticut who voted for this leftist low-life.


18 posted on 03/31/2015 1:51:14 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

I think Ted Cruz should backtrack on his support for the Indiana measure: he should call for it to be amended to be identical to Connecticut’s by removing the adverb “substantially” governing the verb “burden”. (Heh! heh! heh!)


19 posted on 03/31/2015 2:02:49 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
Gov.Mallory wants the NCAA women's final four in 2015 to move out of Indiana. Let's see, Mallory, Florida has the same law... and Gino and the UConn women's team will be in Tampa. Shouldn't you tell Gino and the team they CAN'T go to the final four in Tampa?

Go UConn!!!! (Unless, Mallory tell you you can't come to Tampa.)

20 posted on 03/31/2015 3:20:29 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson