If the administration loses in King, it can announce that it is complying with the Supreme Court’s judgment — but only with respect to the four plaintiffs who brought the suit.
SNIP
The administration would simply be refusing to extend the Supreme Court’s reasoning to the millions of people who, like the plaintiffs, may be eligible for tax credits but, unlike the plaintiffs, did not sue.
And of course, the "Slimes" is hoping he will do so.
Impeachment, followed by full repeal of OZEROCare is the only option. But that won’t happen because the GOPe will not do it.
What’s Plan B?
Nothing constrains him. He does not believe in limited government and is on record trashing the Constitution.
This is some sort of joke right? Of course he’ll bypass government, so long as Congress continues to write him blank checks.
How would the SCOTUS make him comply? Congress is "supposed" to do that ostensibly through IMPEACHMENT, but with Mitchie and Little Johnny Boehner that won't happen, and he knows it!
what’s the supreme court going to do if the administration simply refuses to abide by their decisions?
the founders never considered the possibility that the person holding the job of president would be so brazen about their disregard for the Constitution.
The best thing that could happen to the present phony “health insurance” scheme as laid out in the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010” is its rapid collapse.
Never a workable plan, it is more concerned with transfer of wealth than with providing adequate compensation for the delivery of health services, either to the doctors and supporting infrastructure, or to the patients who mistakenly believe they have something of value.
What with co-pays and deductibles, the family plans offered would force the applicants into near bankruptcy before any claims would be paid out. And that was supposed to be one of the major problems this bogus legislation addressed.
Colossal fail. Catastrophic is only part of it.
If “exchange established by the state” means “exchange established by the federal HHS secretary” then words have absolutely no meaning. Anarchy will prevail.
"The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed—where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.
Well, then, how about an immediate class action suit, on behalf of all the millions of regular, taxpaying victims who lost their policies, and/or saw both their premiums and deductibles skyrocket, while at the same time getting "coverage" that they neither want or can ever use? They certainly can claim standing.
Unless the SC can declare that all the Federal and State statues against fraud do not apply to rogue elected officials.
That would be interesting.
Include me in.
It's called a precedent. It will open the floodgates to millions of suits that lower courts will have to rule likewise on. Hussein's goon squad may be JV, but surely they've considered this.
This is the kind of insanity that can only exist in la-la lawyer land. Should Obama lose in King, it would mean that many billions of dollars annually are being given illegally to millions of recipients. On Constitutional grounds, this is a presidential usurpation of the power of the purse. On narrowly legalistic grounds, these billions of dollars would be coming either from taxpayers, or non-subsidized ratepayers who are being overcharged to generate the subsidy dollars. If I am being deliberately overchaged so the Obama can pay an illegal subsidy, surely I would have standing to sue.
Why not? Their Check$ will still cash and their Balance$ will still go up. The 3 branches of the tree of TOTALITARIANISM have really grown over the years.
—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
—Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
Doubt that he’ll have to. The bet here is that either Kennedy or Roberts will do a folderooo.
Obama’s 15 minutes is almost so as it ends he will become totally insane
Court rulings have never stopped this guy before.
The disturbing thing: our government is actually arguing that it doesn’t have to follow a law that it created itself.
And half the Court already argues that no, it doesn’t have too.
Just think about that a minute.
Mark Levin is 1000% right that the Obama Admin is a “Catch me if you can” Administration.