Posted on 02/19/2015 7:20:25 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
When Taylor Swift throws shade, you know it.
Yet, the Internet had a field day when the "Shake It Off" singer was seated next to Sarah Palin Sunday during the Saturday Night Live 40th Anniversary Show. But, despite multiple accusations of eye rolling and/or serious side eye directed at the former vice presidential hopeful, Taylor didn't cast any devious glances in studio 8H.
If you look at a wider audience shot, you'll see that Taylor (and almost every other individual seated in the area surrounding her) was looking up at the monitors showing what viewers at home saw of Dakota Johnson's bit. On the opposite side of Taylor, Steven Spielberg could be seen looking at the same monitor. Interestingly enough, people chose to create a fictitious feud between Taylor and the former Alaskan governor but did not create any imaginary beef between the singer and Mr. Spielberg.
Haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate, sure, but do they have to be sexist, too? Shake it off, y'all, there's no bad blood here! That said, seating Taylor next to Sarah had the potential to be slightly awkwardif only for the fact that they don't appear to have a lot in common...
Taylor tends to shy away from polarizing topics like politics and religion. Sarah, as we all know very well, does not. And while Taylor is the ultimate cat lover (she even made a Valentine for her kitten, Olivia Benson), rumor has it that Sarah is no fan of felines.
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
Good
RE :” I didn't say she was trashy and self-centered, I said she wasn't a rocket surgeon.
Most people aren't...and as your response illustrates, that includes you.”
Nor is Palin obviously.
More evidence that this belongs in BREAKING NEWS.
.
Well Sicko-flibs, what you easily missed is that it had nothing whatsoever to do with Palin or anyone else.
The comments were all about the total, manufactured, fakeness of Taylor Swift.
A few trivial gifts are just a part of the manufacturing process. That fake persona is necessary if one is to skim their millions from the hero worship market, so it just all falls in a days work.
I just keep on forgetting how much you worship fakeness.
.
.
Only a wikipedophile would stand by the reliability of a Wiki article.
I was just going by what is visible, not writing a biography.
.
Many of them were her personal time.
RE :”I just keep on forgetting how much you worship fakeness.”
This type of fakeness you mean?
.
At least the truth comes out now!
.
You Palin derangement Psychopaths are nothing if not predictable.
.
I was thinking the same of the Palinistas.
Recall the make believe 2012 campaign tour that suckered so many of the gullible.
But I'd still hit it.
....and.....
I fail to see a problem here.
I admire Taylor for being a shrewd business woman. She’s taken some big risks and she’s reaped big rewards. She’s not dating anyone right now and she’s frankly rather conservative with her behavior. No tattoos, no DUI arrests, no pictures of her slumming at some NYC disco at 3am, and no reports of police coming to her house like with Justin Bieber.
Does she cozy up with a lot of liberals? Of course she does! She’s in the entertainment industry and it’s mostly liberals so it’s inevitable that she’d be around them.
But keep in mind she came up as a country artist so it stands to reason she’s a closet conservative who mostly stays apolitical so she doesn’t alienate any part of her audience.
Try to find a quote of hers saying something fawning about Obama. There isn’t one.
Not to say she’s perfect, but she’s done nothing to warrant any attacks from people on this forum.
Perfectly acceptable.
NOT guilty!
Too funny!
You got any pichers a her "sexualizing herself?" Ya shud post em. I'd hit dat.
Okay she dresses like a whore. She sexualizes herself which is not a great thing for young girls to emulate, and is a spiteful person who uses their music career to get back at people she believes deserve it......Are you talking about Miley Cyrus? The good things Taylor has done in Berks Co. alone makes you look like a dip-shit,nicely. Her father has done just as much.
Sounds good ‘82. (Once in a while my old alleged brain remembers something correctly!)
I don’t think it’s so much that the gov hates cats as that she’s concerned that some of the larger local fauna might look at them as snacks.
OMG, someone has finally discovered me and outed me HERE on this thread for all to see . All these years I have gone here undetected as a dangerous PDSer.
What was your first clue Sherlock?
When I ridiculed rabid Palinistas like You?
So I'm a "wikipedophile" for saying I assumed that a Wikipedia page that cites 550 references was "mostly accurate." You offered no rebuttal to the page's specific contents, preferring to lash out at me instead.
I was just going by what is visible, not writing a biography.
You're uninformed and damn proud of it.
Ugly.
I like Taylor Swift. WB.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.