Posted on 02/19/2015 7:20:25 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
When Taylor Swift throws shade, you know it.
Yet, the Internet had a field day when the "Shake It Off" singer was seated next to Sarah Palin Sunday during the Saturday Night Live 40th Anniversary Show. But, despite multiple accusations of eye rolling and/or serious side eye directed at the former vice presidential hopeful, Taylor didn't cast any devious glances in studio 8H.
If you look at a wider audience shot, you'll see that Taylor (and almost every other individual seated in the area surrounding her) was looking up at the monitors showing what viewers at home saw of Dakota Johnson's bit. On the opposite side of Taylor, Steven Spielberg could be seen looking at the same monitor. Interestingly enough, people chose to create a fictitious feud between Taylor and the former Alaskan governor but did not create any imaginary beef between the singer and Mr. Spielberg.
Haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate, sure, but do they have to be sexist, too? Shake it off, y'all, there's no bad blood here! That said, seating Taylor next to Sarah had the potential to be slightly awkwardif only for the fact that they don't appear to have a lot in common...
Taylor tends to shy away from polarizing topics like politics and religion. Sarah, as we all know very well, does not. And while Taylor is the ultimate cat lover (she even made a Valentine for her kitten, Olivia Benson), rumor has it that Sarah is no fan of felines.
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
“...forming a new letter. qy...”
That would be pronounced “kyou-ee”
As in “Wow... she’s a REAL qy!”
Or
“They lined up in the qy at the train station.”
or
“She had qy and bacon for breakfast...”
You could kind of use it for whatever you wanted.
(yeah... I know... but it’s Sunday, and I’m hungover...)
“thumbs up”
.
Wake up Nathan!
I was merely matching my rhetoric to Sicko’s to stay in step with his false indignity.
Sicko-flibs is always automatically opposed to the underlings rising up, and anything upsetting the equilibrium of our ‘betters.’
I too was disappointed with Palin’s reluctance to run until I found out why she abstained. I do not see her running in ‘16.
.
.
Those that descend to Wiki’s level are ‘Wikipedophiles.’
Wear it with pride I guess, ugly as it is.
Stick with manufactured heroes, and you can always return them to the dealer (or not).
.
You have a real problem that you need to resolve. Good luck!
.
No problem here.
I don’t worship manufactured heroes; that’s your problem.
.
Was it meant as an insult?
A psychopath with a keyboard?
underlings ..?? ...rising up ,, ??
LOL
RE:I too was disappointed with Palins reluctance to run until I found out why she abstained."
That was her FNC gig.....
Okay, maybe you should expand your horizons into the real world - just a bit. I think that you do sympathize with most of us peons but you tend to get too involved in those that are a bit different than you in beliefs (call it the movies). Really, do you think that everyone that does not condemn Hollywood and Nashville are just wrong?
Son, you need to get a life and while you are at it, stop praying on the innocent folks that visit this site! You are one of the oldest creeps that I have experienced here and am not so proud to have outed you! You are one of a kind!
Its long past time to round them all up and put them in a place where they cant harm themselves or others.
A Palinista camp :)
“...Wake up Nathan!...”
I am awake.
Words mean things. Save the “psychopath” crap for those it really applies to.
Sickoflibs - not “Sicko-flibs” as you wrote - is as entitled to his opinion as you are. You disagree with him, fine. That’s what a discussion forum is all about.
Save the name-calling for someone else on another forum.
As for Governor Palin, I don’t see it happening either. I’d like to see it, but it isn’t about what I want.
It’s inappropriate as Hell.
Haha!!!
This Palinista will retreat to the jungles and carry on from there!
:^)
I don’t understand those who worship Palin (yeah, I said worship) because that’s what it is. I don’t trust her because of what she did in Phoenix boosting McCain. The loyalty excuse is 100% BS, because loyalty to evil is NOT an attribute. And she has backed half a dozen RINOS, and one socialist in Alaska. I don’t even care to discuss her.I’m also not going to slap down those who love her, because it is rather pointless.She isn’t running for anything. 2 cents : )
Yeah, it’s definitely not worth arguing over.
I understand it. People want “heros”, they made her into one, and they won’t let go.
Anyone still madly in love with her after she endorsed leftist scum in Alaska because her former ally Sean Parnell repealed her PET TAX, is probably a lost cause.
I’ll say it for the 2,751st time: Any person included in this ping has a better chance of being elected POTUS than Sarah Palin does,
She was “Quayled” and is seen too negatively by too many people, especially fat, ugly, barren feminists that are jealous of her. They would vote for Bin Laden before Sarah Palin.
I’m running....
Bravo!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.