Evolution and allegiance to the Church of Global Warming
Peeking behind the green curtain
Rethinking the Keystone XL pipeline
Global Warming on Free Republic
Goebbels is applauding in Hell.
Global Warming — er, Climate Change Nanny State PING!
Pretty much every single thing Obola does is an advertisement for anti-federalism.
Question: I'm not convinced that "globull warming" is anything more than an algore method to rake in big bucks.
Will I have to attend an 0bama Reindoctrination Camp?
The goal of these apes is probably to make it ILLEGAL to question anthropogenic global warming.
Hopefully they educate ISIS on the dangers of Glowbull Warming too!
Burning all those people puts so much extra carbon in the air.
How could they be so against Earth!?
Oh the horror!
Nothing but propaganda aimed at producing people who will give up their freedoms and money to “save the planet from globull warming”.
THE WHAT ???!!??
I just appointed myself The Citizen's Bullshit Spotterr And Advisor and I have spotted a great big FAT one and I advise us all to laugh uproarishly at the count of
1 ... 2 .... 3 ...
BWAAAHAAAWWWOR
If you want “climate smart citizenry”, the first thing you do is fire all the professors and weather “scientists” who claim the content of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has some totally disproportionate effect on the overall global temperature. Without that stupidity being bandied about, the average IQ of the whole world would go up immediately.
The content of CO2 in the atmosphere is only one of perhaps hundreds, or even thousands, of parameters of weather patterns and average global temperatures, and it is proportionately one of the very smallest in its effect. Water vapor has a much more vast effect on atmospheric temperatures than carbon dioxide EVER could, even if the concentration of carbon dioxide were to rise to anywhere near the concentration of water vapor even in the most arid locations on earth.
And it does not. Cannot, so long as there are green growing plants in the terrestrial parts of the planet, and in the shallow waters of the shorelines and inundated land forms.
Now oxygen, THAT is a highly corrosive element, and should be treated with great care.
Another phrase turned into a Newspeak lie: “climate smart”.
To really be climate smart, one would have to understand that non-linear dynamical systems cannot be predicted long-term without perfect, complete initial data, which is never available; that non-urban temperature measurement stations provide more reliable temperature data than urban stations; that global mean temperature was higher in the Middle Ages, during the flourishing of the Roman Empire and during the height of the Minoan civilization than it is now, and in the last case that it would be two centuries on if any of the global warming models has turned out to be right; that ice core data suggest atmospheric CO2 is a trailing indicator of global mean temperature; that a run of 15 years of data contrary to that predicted by a theory falsifies the theory and means that continuing to hold the theory as true has ceased to be scientific;... Exactly the opposite of what the Obama administration means by the phrase.
Just remember: War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength!
There’s an old saying: “Everyone is always talking about The Weather, but no one does anything about it” ...
Well Thank God Obama is finally doing something about it.
The audacity of announcing a propaganda campaign and not hiding that it’s a propaganda campaign.
Yes, there are strong scientific underpinnings to the proven FACT that you must sacrifice a chicken at midnight every new moon to prevent global cooling .... uhh ... global warming ... uhhhh ... CLIMATE CHANGE.
Give everybody Obamabrellas.
-PJ
NOW WHAT?!? Nanny, nanny, nanny, that’s all these people do.
The WH must encourage Congress to propose a Goebbels warming amendment to the Constitution to the states. And if the states choose to ratify the amendment then the feds will have the constitutional authority to officially address such issues and the WH will be a hero.
Holdren is another one who thinks there are too many people, but he won't leave.
In 1969, this Science genius wrote a book assuring us that, no matter the advances in technology, the US could never be able to feed the 280 million people we would have living here in 2040 (71 years from the time of his publication.).
There were 210 million in the US in 1969. We passed 280 million before 2000 (in 31 years, beating that part of his prediction by 40 years). We have yet to feel one bit of the "misery" that he foretold, while he was assuring us that we needed to allow government in install population controls (not unlike China's One Child policy). THIS is who is telling us that we must be "educated" in the ways that he demands, rather than letting the scientific method do its work.
Maybe we can convince them that setting fire to people is bad for the Ecology.
Wait, what are we calling the Ecology now?