Posted on 01/17/2015 2:34:14 PM PST by juliosevero
Lavender is more likely.
The Republican party already knows we dont have their back...they arent concerned.
They’re going to get a serious lesson if Jeb is the nominee. Everyone I know is repulsed every time him name comes up. They will not be voting for him. And I live in a very red state.
Jeb Bush is about as conservative as Barbara Boxer, with more baggage. There is no way on G_d’s green earth he could be elected, even if he ran against Hitlery.
Give it up.
Clearly, I agree.
Wondering if this rectal feeding of Bush is a trial. I don’t think it will go down (up!) this time.
They're after the minority groups and we will see them play to them.
In the case of State initiatives we do have direct democracy.
And in the special case of homosexual “marriage”, we have outright abuse of power by appointed judges.
Never mind the debate about how far they can go in striking down laws as “unconstitutional”, in this case they have simply redefined the word to mean something entirely different from any usage in all of human history.
Even the Polygamists were talking about opposite genders.
We aren’t tied to activist judges either under the Constitution. Congress has the right to define the scope of their jurisdiction. This is clearly one of those cases. DOMA didn’t go far enough.
The issue for Bush is he doesn’t seem to get the outrageousness of the judge doing that. And then goes further by trying to characterize it as a polite little debate, instead of the social foundation issue it is.
Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften war stance...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.[Posted on 01/31/2013 5:08:50 PM PST by xzins]
Jeb Bush praised by gay magazine ................
“Also Sprach Log Cabin Republicans.”
My apologies to Nietzsche.
Very interesting! Some conservative author should address it. I have published some positive speeches by Paul against Muslim persecution against Christians. Yet, his soft stance on gay ‘marriage’ should be denounced! Do you know some author who has already done it?
The people behind the JEB thingy are HILLAY supporters!!!
You can NOT be that dumb and be a Freeper....JEB has more baggage than BABY KILLER BARBARA BOXER??? That is IGNORMT...I don’t like JEB, but I DETEST BABY KILLER, ANTI CHRISTIAN BABS BOXER....what the HELL are you smoking? Or are you a Democrat? geesh...get a GRIP!
I was not a big fan of W but I prefer him to any of the other Bushs. And that’s including his father. George H. W. Bush was too wrapped up in all this new world order BS. He sold us down the river.
I looked at Jebs facebook page. Most of the comments there are cookie-cutter bullshtein fake praise. It really is funny.
Who can tell how many fake facebook followers Bush has?
Another reason . I am fed up of these families who keep running for the stupid to keep voting them in.
I doubt it is sealed. Scott Walker can claim being somewhat liberal and say that you have another Bush, plus claim that he stood for something.
He did it himself.
“Who can tell how many fake facebook followers Bush has?”... Go to the Hillary site, the Rand Paul site, the Ron Paul site, the Romney site and the John McCain site-— then do the math.
Jeb Bush compassionate conservatism III
You obviously failed in your recognition of hyperbole lesson.
That said, Jeb is no better a choice than McLane, Romney or Dole. He WILL lose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.