Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

It is rather odd that Mo, piss be upon him, is given this modifier, but I suppose the drivebys suffer from that contagious disease WEDONTWANTOURHEADSCUTOFF-PHOBIA.



1 posted on 01/12/2015 10:10:23 AM PST by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: PROCON

The more important question: at 1:33 min

What does it mean that the media calls him the prophet?
It means they are all muslim converts. When they say this they are saying they accepting a major tenet of Islam.

6:25 Minutes
Brian Lilley on Islamic Jihad Sun News Canada

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFup3TRRDvs


32 posted on 01/12/2015 11:12:34 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

They can call Muhammad (pi$$ be upon him) when they start calling Jesus Lord or Savior. Ain’t gonna happen.


33 posted on 01/12/2015 11:21:09 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

He didn’t prophesy anything but death.


38 posted on 01/12/2015 11:34:38 AM PST by SkyDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

It’s interesting the way socialists approach theological concepts but when it comes to Islam they are not the only ones who refuse to approach the issue. That even includes leading Christian clergy including Pope Francis.

Followers of Mohammed not only claim, but truly believe that God has authorized them to kill those who refuse to submit to their version of God’s will. That is a basic tenet of that religion. A claim which goes unchallanged, which true Christians should condem.

While it’s understandable for atheists which most socialists are, not to approach that claim on a theological basis. It’s bewildering why any Christian clergy refuse to admit it even exists and is a basic part of Islam creed and worse yet are unable to condem it.

The Koran and its enforcement of sharia law is a pseudo religious concoction using monotheistic selected texts taken and misconstrued from the new and old testaments. That institutionalizes disgusting arab tribal views, observances,and customs. Claiming adhearants are authorized by our Creator to demand submission to it or suffer an ignominious death administered by its followers.

://www.theusmat.com/islamandfreewill.htm


41 posted on 01/12/2015 12:24:36 PM PST by mosesdapoet (Some of my best rebuttals are in FR's along with meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

This is a little off topic but a great movie about Islam is streaming on Netflix called “The Day of the Siege”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_Eleven_1683:

“The Day of the Siege: September Eleven 1683 (Italian: 11 Settembre 1683, Polish title: Bitwa pod Wiedniem, literally: “The Battle of Vienna”) is a 2012 English-language Polish and Italian fictional historical drama film based on the 1683 Battle of Vienna and directed by Renzo Martinelli. The film was released on October 12, 2012.”


42 posted on 01/12/2015 12:24:52 PM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

I hate how they always say “the prophet Mohamad” or the way they pronounce “Pah-kee-stan.”

If they are doing it because that is how Pakistanis say it then why not say

Espana
Italia
Deutchland
France (with the French pronunciation)
Me-hee-co


43 posted on 01/12/2015 1:19:47 PM PST by rfreedom4u (Do you know who Barry Soetoro is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Similarly, immediately after the Muhammadans’ great public-realtions coup on 11 September 2001, big media began to refer to the Koran as “the holy Koran.”


46 posted on 01/12/2015 2:37:08 PM PST by StephenSeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Look who owns them and they are cowards.


49 posted on 01/12/2015 2:49:30 PM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

I really like the idea of simply referring to him as the ‘alleged prophet mohammed’.


50 posted on 01/12/2015 3:06:00 PM PST by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Fear of getting their heads cut off while uts broadcast on the internet


51 posted on 01/12/2015 4:33:09 PM PST by Personal Responsibility (I'd use the /S tag but is it really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

In an ever-so-slight defense of the press, I’ll offer this explanation. Since virtually every current terrorist is also named Mohammed, it’s a way of differentiating the current terrorists from the one from a dozen centuries ago. Besides that, the press doesn’t have the cojones to call him “the dead, lying, pedophile, murderer, Mohammed”.


52 posted on 01/12/2015 5:39:53 PM PST by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson