Dear Black People: Stop Acting Like Terrorists

Poor Eric Holder and Barack Obama. At least they can tell themselves (and their followers) that they tried. They really, really tried. In their naked attempt to railroad and lynch a white police officer, Darren Wilson, they used — abused, that is — the grotesque power of their offices to foment terrible race riots in the faraway city of Ferguson. Now it’s all blowing up in their faces. That is, in the legal and political senses, just as the exact same tactics blew up in their faces last year in the George Zimmerman trial.

New information about an abundance of previously unknown eyewitness testimony and detailed forensic evidence presented to the grand jury indicates that Wilson’s story is just about completely backed-up by most of it. There’s a very good chance that Wilson won’t be charged with any crime at all.

Reports from the proceedings have it that seven or eight African-American eyewitnesses, who wish not to be identified for their own safety, corroborate Wilson’s version of what happened, and how it happened. So do the reported analyses of blood, blood splatter, DNA, ballistics, fingerprints, and shell casings.

In fact, where the shell casings landed in relation to the final position of Brown’s body shows that Wilson had to have been backing away from Brown as he fired, with Brown advancing on him or charging at him.

As he prepares to leave office in disgrace, Eric Holder is a depressed and devastated shell of his former, formidable infamy as Black Panther consigliere to the HNIC.

What a relief. I admit, it was looking rather sketchy there for a few weeks. Along with a gaggle of shady characters as alleged witnesses to the incident, offering several shifting accounts portraying some sort of murderous cop, mainstream media outlets were pushing the claim that a couple of construction workers had supposedly been working a mere “50 feet” from the scene of the Michael Brown shooting, and that they saw Brown “surrendering with his hands up” when Wilson shot him. There’s even cell phone video of the two workers standing next to their truck in the aftermath, one of them gesturing and hollering indignantly about it. He poses with his hands up, to demonstrate how Brown was supposedly no threat to Wilson. Problem is, they were actually much further away than the purported 50 feet — aerial photo and video analysis (expertly done by blogger “sundance” at The Conservative Treehouse) proves it was actually over 220 feet. Despite this huge discrepancy, the bogus “50 feet” meme took hold pretty much everywhere.

Whatever amount of the incident the workers were able to see, their reactions captured on video could also have been influenced by dubious alarms raised by others around them — someone yells out an allegation, and others pick it up and spread it. Still, their version, combined with the likely coached (by professional race-agitators) statements of other “eyewitnesses,” had made it seem for awhile there like Wilson might wind up indicted.

Suddenly, now, a steady flow of fresh information has blown the usual left-wing racial narrative clear out of the water. Mainstream media sources are executing an astonishing 180-degree turn on this case, apparently because they know the jig is about to be up, and even they don’t want to see much more mayhem, looting, burning, and random murders, in Ferguson, St. Louis, or anywhere else, as revenge by black mobs for lack of immediate prison or death penalty for Darren Wilson. The establishment media are trying to let the rapidly-heating air out of the balloon before it explodes.

The racial unrest in and around Ferguson and St. Louis has not stopped. The general consensus among analysts is that the threat of thousands of feral, outraged blacks rioting and wildly destroying everything and any random white person in sight is so dire and so imminent that there is now a calculated, stealth public relations campaign to leak the grand jury findings to the masses in a trickle that is just urgent and steady enough to stave off a total disaster of Rodney King 1992 dimensions: By allowing the jarring news about the evidence and likely grand jury decision to seep out to the public in the staccato flow as they have been leaking it, sober officials and media bosses have signaled that they want to prepare the quaking guerilla terrorist armies of blacks for the disappointment that appears to be coming soon for them. The grand jury is expected to announce its decision within the next couple of weeks or so. The gatekeepers of critical information figure that if the good news for Darren Wilson dawns on the angry mobs ahead of that time, in chunks, they’ll be less likely to explode in total, widespread melees of wanton savagery if he is no-billed.

I’m not sure that plan will work. Militant black leaders and activists keep loudly guaranteeing all apocalyptic hell will break loose if Wilson is not indicted. They either don’t care about facts and evidence, or they declare that the grand jury investigative process is unfairly corrupted in favor of whites against blacks. As new information about the grand jury evidence is released, the black mobs have begun to violently turn on their erstwhile friends, the media.

I and millions of others wish a vast segment of the black population in America would or could just grow up and join the rest of civilized society. Yes, there are some bad cops and bad people in power in our society, and some degree of racism of an evil nature does exist. But our society is recognizing that most of the evil racism has its modern-day stronghold among the millions of incendiary malcontents and depraved violent criminals overrunning most of America’s countless black ghettoes. They make streets, shopping centers, parks, restaurants, public transportation, and even classrooms dangerous places for people of all races. They keep polite society and even entire police departments and elected officials in quivering subjugation to their foaming, guttural demands, threats of violence, and actual violence. They are terrorists.

There’s a new movie being promoted all over mainstream and social media, it’s titled “Dear White People.” The trailer comes across like the celluloid spawn of Spike Lee and Will Ferrell. It’s winning big awards and getting raving acclaim. I admit that the bits of it I’ve seen in previews are wildly provocative and well-executed, to the point of being hysterical. But as with an artfully well-produced Michael Moore piece of deceptive propaganda, what I’ve glimpsed of it sickens me. That’s because it appears to promote the same old perverse political correctness; the Leftist narrative about the pernicious pervasiveness of white privilege and all that. In short, although outrageously hilarious, it seems like it’s just another loooong lecture delivered by blacks, to whites, about race.

That brings us back to Eric Holder. Back in 2009 he said we were “a nation of cowards” on the topic of race, and that we needed to have “a national conversation” about race. Well, it certainly can be proven that national conversations about racehave been going on in America since long before Eric Holder’s people realized they could get away with terrorizing white voters, and white people in general. But I agree that we’ve largely been a nation of cowards about it all.

Whites have been terrorized and threatened into cowardly, silent acquiescence by the likes of everyone from William Tecumseh Sherman to Colin Ferguson to…Eric Holder. Whites have been too scared of the political and workplace minefields — and the physical violence — to speak frankly to blacks, and blacks have been too scared of being told the honest truth, and of losing the ground they’ve gained, to listen to whites at all.

For this part of my part of the ongoing conversation, I’ll say this — and for once, blacks had better listen: Stop acting like terrorists. Besides just being the right thing to do, if whites ever stopped being cowards, there are still far more than enough of us to teach you a lesson. If you can’t make your case in the arena of jurisprudence, while the U.S. Attorney General is also the consigliere and enforcer for the New Black Panthers, then you have no case. Darren Wilson killed Michael Brown in a justified act of self-defense. STFU and accept the facts and evidence.

I would think you’d already realize that you really don’t want white people to suddenly get disorderly on you for a change.

Big Media has some explaining to do.

Their theory is that they will always ask the questions, and will themselves never have to explain anything. It is my theory that in principle it is possible that they could be brought to book, but I’m a little hazy on a couple of details. Here are the parameters as I see it:

There has never, in the modern era, been a political class with the guts to stand up to the political clout of journalism - there is never likely to be. That includes even Ronald Reagan. So the only possible recourse would have to come from the courts - specifically, the Supreme Court of the United States. Since the SCOTUS ObamaCare decision we worry about Chief Justice Roberts, but we have no imminent prospects of ever having a better lineup at SCOTUS than we do today. We should go for it.

Since we’re never going to have an administration with the political will to confront journalism, we - and who “we” is, I’m not precisely clear on - must file a civil suit against “the media.”

But “the media” is an amorphous concept, not an identifiable defendant - and “the media” as we know it includes fiction as well as nonfiction productions. So “the media” is out as a defendant; we need to be specific and we need to be correctly targeted. Our real beef is with journalism as an institution, and yet there are all sorts of First Amendment qualms about any action against it. However, it is my thesis that that concern is misplaced because journalism which is “the media” is abusive of the First Amendment.

There are three main characteristics of “media” journalism.

”media” journalism claims to be objective - which proves that they do not take the difficulty of minimizing the tendency of “where you stand” to be influenced by “where you sit.” Claiming to be objective constitutes proof that you are not objective about yourself.
”media” journalism is actually broadcast journalism, and
”media” journalism is wire service journalism - and the wire services (all of them) inherently homogenize journalism.
IMHO those two characteristics define our defendant. The wire services in general and the Associated Press in particular inherently homogenize journalism because they constitute active cooperation among journalists in determining what the news is. And what is “objective.”

Since all major journalism, including broadcast journalism, is wire service journalism, simply naming the wire services and their members as defendants covers the waterfront of active defendants. But in the case of broadcast journalism there is the major item of the imprimatur of the government on “objective” journalism broadcast over “public” airwaves. There is no logical proof of journalism’s objectivity, and the government exceeds its First Amendment limitations when it suggests otherwise. The FCC is a linchpin of “media journalism,” and it must be a defendant in our suit. In addition, the Federal Election Commission represents McCain-Feingold and the rest of “Campaign Finance Reform,” all of which are based on the theory that wire service journalism is objective. The FEC should be sued into oblivion.
The torts which should be alleged consist, IMHO, of

depriving the country of independent journalism. Wire service journalism is free, yes - but not independent, no. Wire service journalism is a single entity.
conspiring to promote journalism at the expense of responsibility. Theodore Roosevelt defined the issue in his 1910 “Man in the Arena” speech:
”It is not the critic who counts . . . the credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena . . . who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly . . .” The “Objectivity Establishment” systematically promotes the opposite, cynical perspective that “If you own a business, you didn’t build that . . .” Rejection of the claim of “journalistic objectivity” does not depend solely on the philosophical claim of the impossibility of objectivity, or the unprovability of the claim. The claim of journalistic objectivity falls because if you restrict your attention to the performance of journalism in comparison to truth - that is, if you compare what was said by journalism to be objective, with what time has shown to be true, journalism flunks. And even when truth is already known - for example, that Zimmerman was Not Guilty because he was attacked and battered to a dangerous degree before he used his weapon - journalism will continue to demagogue to the contrary. That demagoguery is dangerous to George Zimmerman, it is dangerous to Officer Wilson, and it is dangerous to the people not only in Florida and Missouri, but to the nation. The FCC does not have the right to enable demagogic journalism when public order is at risk. Broadcast journalists have licenses, and they should lose them if they endanger public safety.

We have the defendant, and we have the tort. Who is the plaintiff????

I said the point is culture. For people willing to acclimate, we can at least attempt to integrate them. In the end, yeah, we are all human race. God created all of us. Good and ignorant.

Are the races equal? I think it's subjective again, to culture. We all have an unknown potential. Does the culture nurture that potential or savagely crush it? Can an individual taken out of one cultural environment and placed in another successfully adapt and acclimatize, then adapt to those cultural standards? We see it constantly.

As far as being trained, where did you get yours? Do you believe that blacks can never adapt to American culture and thrive? Again, hundreds of examples that a few individuals do so with great success.

No, I will not ever condemn anyone for their race. I believe the attitude that tends to do so is filled with the sort of filth that should be flushed rather than fostered.

Are American conservative Christians culturally superior? Absolutely. But it's an open club and anyone can join as long as they respect the rules.

The races are equal and identical, then. Thanks for such profound insight. You have been trained successfully. Where do I report for re-education?

Seriously? What is wrong with you? You don't belong on FreeRepublic.

Thus being said, I believe there is nothing left unsaid between us in this lifetime. I hope you turn yours around, I will not be corresponding with you again in this one.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.