Posted on 10/08/2014 8:02:32 AM PDT by Normandy
A copy of the 3rd Party Report has been released and is now posted at the web site Sifferkol.se
Link: http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf
Key findings: COP of COP of 3.2-3.6 over a 32 day period and isotopic change in nickel and lithium was found to have changed substantially after run.
The authors conclude, "Once again, even in the most conservative scenarios, we have values that allow us to conclude that the reactor studied here may not be considered a conventional source of energy."
UPDATE: From Rossi on the Journal of Nuclear Physics:
To all the Readers of the Journal of Nuclear Physics: The Report of the Independent Third Party has been published on http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ Warm Regards Andrea Rossi
CORRECTION: I have heard from Mats Lewan who wanted to be clear that the report was NOT leaked. He explains on his An Impossible Invention site how publication came about:
The report has been uploaded to Arxiv.org which, however has put it on hold, without specifying any motive for this. It has also been sent to Journal of Physics D. I got the report sent to me by Hanno Essén who said that he now considers it to be public, although not supposed to be published in any commercial journal until further notice from Journal of Physics D.
A picture of the new-style E-Cat. It looks very different from what we have seen previously:
new ecat
Here's another with it placed on the testing rack. No unusual radiation was detected, but where is the shielding on this?
new ecat1 Observation of abundant heat production from a reactor device and of isotopic changes in the fuel by ecatworld
(Excerpt) Read more at e-catworld.com ...
It can’t possibly be true. I have yet to see a single environmentalist protest it.
Normandy,
This article is confusing to read. Does this mean that e-cat works
or doesn’t work?
Say, something more like this perhaps:
Why is EVERYTHING weasel-words in this arena???
I don't care if it is a CONVENTIONAL source of energy.
I only want to know if it is a source of energy or not.
Gibberish?.....................
It is available at the Kwik mart in Ferguson.
Yes,
The were getting at least 3 times more energy than was input into the reactor continuously over a period of more than thirty days.
ping
i wish
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.