Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California man whose dog was killed by cops faces up to five years in prison
Russia Today ^ | Published time: August 14, 2013 15:59

Posted on 09/06/2014 9:54:58 PM PDT by SirPeredur

The California owner of a Rottweiler that was fatally shot by police has been charged with multiple felony counts on Tuesday, including one charge of intimidating a witness.

He is currently being held on $310,000 bail and faces up to five years in prison if convicted of the six felony counts and one misdemeanor he is charged with.

Leon Cordell Rosby, a 52-year-old man from Hawthorne, Calif., was walking his dog “Max” while watching a police response to a robbery on June 30. The California man had loud music playing from his car and was videotaping the showdown with his cell phone.


TOPICS: Government; Local News
KEYWORDS: cops; dog; donutwatch; shoot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
I have no words to express my sadness and disgust.
1 posted on 09/06/2014 9:54:58 PM PDT by SirPeredur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirPeredur
'Rosby was on Tuesday charged with two counts of intimidating a witness, two counts of dissuading a witness from prosecuting a crime, and two counts of making criminal threats – all six of which are felonies. He was also charged with one misdemeanor count of resisting arrest.'

Not a bright thing to do.

2 posted on 09/06/2014 10:00:16 PM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirPeredur

This man has ruined almost any chance to get a sympathetic hearing in court because of #1. His insistence on walking his dog at very close proximity to a pack of police cars while they were in the middle of an active arrest, #2, His Bullying, hysterical overreactions to being filmed. Of course, yes, it was wrong and cruel for the police to shoot his dog that way. He could have avoided the entire incident.


3 posted on 09/06/2014 10:15:38 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirPeredur

I used to give the police the benefit of the doubt.

There are too many videos like this to do that any longer.

I used to think that American blacks were hypersensitive about the popo.

That’s changed, too, maybe because now we all live in a police state.

Still, there are good cops out there. There really are. It’s just that 90% give the other 10% a bad name.


4 posted on 09/06/2014 10:25:56 PM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirPeredur

This guy was highly irresponsible in how he approached this situation and from what I observed was trying to get a reaction from the Police. He put his dog in that situation, failed to properly secure his dog before approaching the Officers, and owns part of the responsibility for his dogs death.

On the other hand, why was this guy detained and placed into handcuffs? For videotaping? From what I saw this was all senseless and resulted in the unecessary death of Max. This video was extremely sickening.


5 posted on 09/06/2014 10:30:02 PM PDT by Render
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirPeredur

Why the hell did they take him into custody?

Didn’t appear to be doing anything wrong...


6 posted on 09/06/2014 10:34:40 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I think it’s rather obvious: they wanted to lard on some felony charges so they could trade of dismissal of the charges in exchange for his agreement not to sue for wantonly killing his dog.


7 posted on 09/06/2014 10:45:25 PM PDT by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SirPeredur
For a fuller accounting of this episode:

Leon Rosby owner of dog killed by police arraigned on felony charges

I have zero sympathy for this thug.

As for the dog: The thing was aggressive and inches from the cops. Were they supposed to wait for the biting to start?

8 posted on 09/06/2014 11:01:31 PM PDT by Dagnabitt (Amnesty is Treason. Its agents are Traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Render
On the other hand, why was this guy detained and placed into handcuffs? For videotaping?

The cops are just going to have to get used to living in a world where everything they do is videotaped, either by ubiquitous security cameras owned by the government and private citizens or by people carrying cameras on themselves and in their cars. Then they will have to start recording everything they do if for no other reason than to have a defense against creative editing by other camera owners.

Also be on the lookout for laws which require cameras to automatically shut down based on either a radio or optical signal so police can create blackout zones where they can't be observed. Better save some of today's cameras so you have something without any such new feature.

9 posted on 09/06/2014 11:02:49 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dagnabitt
Working link:

Leon Rosby arraigned

10 posted on 09/06/2014 11:06:13 PM PDT by Dagnabitt (Amnesty is Treason. Its agents are Traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dagnabitt
As for the dog: The thing was aggressive and inches from the cops. Were they supposed to wait for the biting to start?

True, the dog was inches from the cop. But the cops set that whole thing in motion. I don't care if that man had an arrest record a mile long. He was just standing on a street corner. He wasn't bothering anyone, and he wasn't interfering with anyone.

The only reason the cops moved on him was that he had his cell phone out, which was his right. I hope those cops get fired, and the man wins a huge settlement from the city.

11 posted on 09/06/2014 11:34:47 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
The guy was taunting police according to the Daily Breeze article. Then he went on to threaten other civilians in the area. He was hardly Jon Q Public, filming from the sidelines. He was interfering and trying to get a reaction.

Hope not a cent of taxpayer money goes to this thug and his media lawyer. The City of Hawthorne has much more pressing budget needs than enriching these folks.

12 posted on 09/06/2014 11:48:29 PM PDT by Dagnabitt (Amnesty is Treason. Its agents are Traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
The only reason the cops moved on him was that he had his cell phone out, which was his right.

It is illegal in some states to video police.

13 posted on 09/06/2014 11:51:38 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

It is illegal in some states to video police.


Some pigs are more equal than others.


14 posted on 09/07/2014 12:18:51 AM PDT by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

It is not illegal in any state to film the police.


15 posted on 09/07/2014 1:07:35 AM PDT by FredZarguna (His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Skepolitic

Well the left and the commie shave succeeded with you


16 posted on 09/07/2014 1:37:41 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

So glad you know why the police moved on him....of course it does not match the facts reported in the actual reporting on the story by local news....but that’s okay because RT is sooo reliable


17 posted on 09/07/2014 1:44:27 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

How very black panther of you


18 posted on 09/07/2014 1:45:27 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
It is not illegal in any state to film the police..

Maybe not Are Cameras the New Guns?

But cops are arresting people anyway

19 posted on 09/07/2014 1:53:05 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Skepolitic

“That’s changed, too, maybe because now we all live in a police state.”

You’ll be in for a RUDE AWAKENING if you believe that we now live in a police state.

Read some books on Stalin’s Russia or North Korea, as I have. It will help.


20 posted on 09/07/2014 4:34:37 AM PDT by BobL (Don't forget - Today's Russians learn math WITHOUT calculators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson