Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stevem

Most insurance policies, unless you pay for special coverage, does *not* cover damages incurred due to civil unrest, riots or looting.


90 posted on 08/24/2014 3:45:24 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

I remember about 6 months after 9/11, my mailbox was stuffed with policy changes in really tiny print for all the policies I held that said ‘terrorism isn’t covered as of now’.


101 posted on 08/24/2014 3:58:36 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr
Most insurance policies, unless you pay for special coverage, does *not* cover damages incurred due to civil unrest, riots or looting.

I left the insurance industry about 13 years ago. That was actually a happy day in my life. Did things change that much? In my day we covered on an "All Risk" policy such things as riot and civil commotion.

On the other hand, if I owned a business in Ferguson I would negotiate with my insurer to let me rebuild somewhere such that local denizens don't try to ruin me because of an event like this.

I don't know what happened there. I doubt Wilson was looking for guys to gun down. I doubt he was hunting for the most dangerous game.

I do know there must be somewhere to build a business where the locals don't blame me for something I can't control. I would ask my insurer to assist with that, maybe for a discounted payoff.

102 posted on 08/24/2014 3:58:42 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson