Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

The victim of gov't tyranny:

http://freepatriot.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Harrington-rainwater-collector-jailed-e1404251636741.jpg

1 posted on 07/05/2014 10:49:16 AM PDT by PoloSec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PoloSec

Should have just said they were wetlands - the libs in OR would have demonstrated and rioted.


2 posted on 07/05/2014 10:54:56 AM PDT by SkyDancer (If you don't read the newspapers you are uninformed. If you do read newspapers you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Patriot. I am in awe of him. Especially because he will lose (one way or the other) in the end.


3 posted on 07/05/2014 10:55:06 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

of interest ping


4 posted on 07/05/2014 10:55:22 AM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
P75689: What are you in for?

P28675: Murder. What are you in for?

P75689: Stealing rain.

5 posted on 07/05/2014 10:55:59 AM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy saints surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
Oregon State claims that Harrington is diverting water meant for the state’s rivers and streams, which is part of their water supply.

The State's claim is too broad and ambiguous. They need to specify the particular stream or river watershed which is being violated. If Harrington's property is not part of a specific watershed then he is not in violation of the idiotic law.

10 posted on 07/05/2014 11:12:07 AM PDT by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
Here's more to the story...

I've got mixed opinions on this.


11 posted on 07/05/2014 11:16:25 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

I’ve got kind of mixed emotions on this one. Our Big ranch is 32 sections (32 square miles) and it feeds to the head of the Concho River. While we have built some small ponds we don’t build them in what we call the main basin so we don’t deprive any of those down stream of much needed water. There is one area on the ranch I could dam up and turn it into a lake about 3 miles long and a mile wide but that cuts off water to neighboring ranches. Water is the life blood to West Texas Ranches.


12 posted on 07/05/2014 11:18:20 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
Water hoarder!!


15 posted on 07/05/2014 11:44:07 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Does that mean that one is not allowed to dig a fish pond on his property to raise fish as a food source?


19 posted on 07/05/2014 12:07:43 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
local jail to serve 30 days

I think the penalty is worse if the EPA rules that the puddle in your backyard is a navigable waterway.

I do see your point but the price of freedom is eternal vigilance and the nation is far from vigilant.

"How strangely will the tools of a tyrant pervert the plain meaning of words!" --Samuel Adams, to John Pitts, 1776

"When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you - you know your nation is doomed." Ayn Rand

"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws." - Tacitus, Roman Senator and Historian (A.D. c.56 - c. 115)

20 posted on 07/05/2014 12:18:52 PM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, trust few, and always paddle your own canoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Well, the next time it floods from rain and private property is damaged, the property owner should rightly sue the state for not controlling their water


21 posted on 07/05/2014 12:38:25 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Well, the next time it floods from rain and private property is damaged, the property owner should rightly sue the state for not controlling their water


23 posted on 07/05/2014 12:40:21 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
He's wrong, and for good reason.

Western water rights are different than Eastern. In the West we have appropriations based on a first in time system. When water is scarce, the most recent priority is shut off first, and so on, with the oldest appropriation having the highest priority.

What he is doing is trying to circumvent others' property rights by keeping all his runoff. Basically, he is stealing water from its rightful owners.

25 posted on 07/07/2014 9:39:16 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

May God send the rain to Texas where it will fall on the just and unjust and we will share it and be thankful knowing that he owns it.


26 posted on 07/07/2014 9:48:57 AM PDT by inpajamas (http://outskirtspress.com/ONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; ...
Wanna see a hero? Here's one...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!

28 posted on 07/07/2014 5:28:23 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson