Posted on 07/04/2014 8:44:43 PM PDT by chessplayer
Their unusually strident dissent written by Sotomayor said the Wheaton injunction threatened the credibility of the Hobby Lobby decision.
"Those who are bound by our decisions usually believe they can take us at our word," Sotomayor wrote. "Not so today."
The point of the dissent? "It is not the business of this court to ensnare itself in the government's ministerial handling of its affairs in the manner it does here," Sotomayor wrote.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Three leftist dunces. Can you even imagine our country controlled by the likes of them?
Are they really admitting they agreed to vote one way in one case so that other justices would vote with them in another case?
Impeach them.
Have we ever had a good Supreme Court Justice who was female? Sandra Day O’Connor was almost as bad as the three succubi we have on the bench today.
Can Supreme Court justices be impeached? And, if so, under what circumstances?
 |
 |
 America demands Justice for the Fallen of Benghazi! |
 |
 |
It is not the business of this court to ensnare itself in the government’s ministerial handling of its affairs in the manner it does here …And here I thought that the Supreme Court was supposed to interpret the laws in light of the Constitution and act as a check on the power of the other two branches of government.
A lot of outrage coming from the dried up bunch.
Sotomayor proves herself to be a true petulant mushbrain and legal (if no other way) lightweight who will vote with her ovaries instead of her self-called “wise” mind. (By the way, has ANYONE else ever spoken of her as “wise”? Just asking.)
She’s the very paradigm of an affirmative action appointment. And THIS, ladies and gentlemen is what we get when empower “diversity”...which, exactly like global warming, is the greatest unproven mendacious pile of liberal mush ever inflicted on a populace that was gullibly willing to give her a chance.
The Left is all pissed that it cannot completely force its depraved agenda down our throats.
I don't understand what they are saying. The three Marxist ladies (members of the Supreme Court due to affirmative action) voted the same way for both cases (against the right of the individual and the right of life. Abortion uber alles for these folks).
Sounds like they are just having a snit fest.
As far as impeachment - would that we could. Of course Holder and Obama should be first in line, but the Republicrats will continue to give them a free pass.
There’s nothing more dangerous than a stupid person vested with power.
Three simple words for the three battleaxes on the SCOTUS ...
GO SCREW YOURSELVES!
Any elected or appointed federal official who is not a Senator nor a Congressman may be impeached. That includes Supreme Court Justices.
The circumstances for all are "high crimes and misdemeanors".
TY
So low crimes don’t count huh
Tough.
Birth control and abortion ARE NOT GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
NOT.
These women Justices are NARAL surrogates acting like politicians in black robes. God Save This Honorable Court!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.