Posted on 06/17/2014 2:59:30 AM PDT by markomalley
In a SHOCKING discovery, CGI Federal – the Canadian Company that built the Obamacare website – appears to have a connection to the “Innocence of Muslims” video the Obama administration blamed for the Benghazi attacks.
And here’s how it was done:
The evidence is well established that in 2010, CGI acquired Stanley Associates, which “provides services to the U.S. federal civilian, defense and intelligence agencies”. [1]
When the crudely produced video “Innocence of Muslims” was posted to a YouTube it needed a boost, especially since it was posted by someone no one had ever heard of and who had only uploaded two videos – that were basically the same.
Well, a YouTube channel known as NewsPoliticsNow3 (NPN3) has been connected to Stanley Associates, the service provider for U.S. defense and “intelligence”.
On September 11, 2012, NewsPoliticsNow3 (NPN3) uploaded a short version of the video (only 1:32 of it). It was in fact NPN3 (see screenshot below taken 19 hours after video uploaded) which gave the crude movie a new title “Innocence of Muslims”, instead of the name given previously (click on image to enlarge).
(Excerpt) Read more at shoebat.com ...
My my....
The ‘do just keeps getting deeper and deeper...
It gets deeper. This is also from Shoebat.com:
Benghazi’s biggest whistleblower just came forward. Her name is Cindy Lee Garcia and she has revealed that the producer of the video the Obama administration blamed for the Benghazi attacks admitted to her that he is a Muslim. This is a game changer. It means that the narrative we’ve been fed – that filmmaker Nakoula Basseley Nakoula was a Coptic Christian is not only false but also a blood libel against Christians.
Garcia’s phone call with Nakoula three weeks ago provides the key to what Benghazi was all about. It was agitprop (agitation / propaganda to push communism), a vehicle to be used by the Obama administration to launch an all out assault on the first amendment. To quote Hillary Clinton at the 2011 “Istanbul Process” meeting, it would be an example of…:
“…some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.”
When riots across the Middle East broke out in response to the video, Hillary and the bunch were able to use those “old-fashioned techniques” in an attempt to shame people into not using their freedom of expression to be critical of Islam.
The problem they did not foresee – aside from the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi – was a whistleblower coming forward that would help to peel back the curtain.
In much the same way that a brave ATF agent named John Dodson came forward to blow the lid on another Obama administration agitprop operation (Fast and Furious), Garcia has come forward with a smoking gun that exposes the administration as being complicit in an agitprop operation designed to help knock off the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Operation Fast and Furious was also agitprop. It was an assault on the second amendment. In much the same way that the Obama administration was willing to exploit the death and destruction resulting from an anti-Muhammad video, it was also willing to exploit the death and destruction resulting from the ATF mandating that gun store owners sell guns to bad guys who would use them to murder a countless number of innocent people.
Obama, Hillary and Holder didn’t count on a Border Patrol agent getting murdered and an ATF agent with a conscience blowing the whistle on the operation. It was hoping that it could levy a blood libel against innocent gun store owners.
In Benghazi, Obama, Hillary, et. al. didn’t count on four Americans getting murdered in its agitprop operation.
They also didn’t count on Benghazi’s John Dodson – Cindy Lee Garcia – coming forward.
lies….and damn lies
these people just think they can get say with anything
unfortunately, they seem to be getting away with it...
All orchestrated and paid for with U.S.taxpayers dollars. WH Communists run amuck like a bull in a china shop wreaking havoc on the people.
Interesting — Is there a second source?
I’m quite certain that we don’t know 5% of what O and his cohorts are doing behind the scenes to destroy us and our nation......
And if only 10% were known, there would be another revolutionary war....even liberals like Ron Fournier and Kirsten Powers are getting fed up.
Before he was identified as a Coptic Christian, Nakouley identified himself as Sam Bacile, an Israeli Jew, and claimed to have made the movie with $5 million in funding raised from 100 Jews. This was a slander of Israel and the Jews.
Before he was identified as a Coptic Christian, Nakouley identified himself as Sam Bacile, an Israeli Jew, and claimed to have made the movie with $5 million in funding raised from 100 Jews. This was a slander of Israel and the Jews.
I’ve told everyone from the very beginning they planned the attack then planned the “video protest” to create the “spontaneous” lie.
Hillary’s plan was to ultimately blame the attack on Mitt Romney and the republicans of collaborating with the terrorist to make Obama look like Peanut Carter.
Yeah, I'm finding it hard to make the leap that "The evidence that NPN3 is a creation of Stanley is captured in the following screenshot:"
Typically that hit will be provided by a hash, and as the screencap says, is the "best guess." I don't consider it hard evidence of anything.
Stanley Inc. Was also responsible for opposition research on behalf of Hillary Clinton in her primary with Barack Obama.
They were looking into passports and birth certificates.
Stanley Inc. uploaded and changed the title of the video the day of the attack in Bengahzi.
The Benghazi video - all documented here - report from a private investigator.
http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/10732#more-10732
Overview
Based on extensive investigation and research in my capacity as an investigator and investigative journalist, it is my professional opinion that blaming the Internet video for the attack at Benghazi is plagued by at least three major irreconcilable inconsistencies that appear to lack any credible explanations in the context of motive:
1. The suppositious relationship between the alleged creator of the video, including others reportedly involved in its funding, creation, distribution and promotion, to U.S. federal intelligence agencies and related government subcontractors. The intelligence agencies include the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);
See #2 and #3
Skip to Video Chronology section and also see Online/Digital forensic investigation section
keep diggin’ There has to be a donkey in here somewhere!!!
Montagraph put up a new video on May 1st. It is basically a refresher of his original findings of the connection between Stanley Inc., a DoD subcontractor, to the Innocence of Muslims video. He also shows when and by whom the name was changed.
Here is a video by another Vlogger who demonstrates how Innocence of Muslims was traced to Stanley Inc. through the meta-data.
Proof Positive - In My Opinion (who created Innocence of Muslims)(Obama) Sept. 20, 2012
BUSTED Once And For All April 30, 2014
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.