Posted on 06/05/2014 12:06:56 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
WASHINGTON -- Congressman Steve Stockman (R-TX 36) transmitted a letter to President Barack Obama Thursday asking if the Obama administration authorized any payment to the Haqqani Network terrorist group in exchange for U.S. Army Spc. Bowe Bergdahl.
The Haqqani Network, which held Bergdahl for five years, funds its terrorist activities in part by ransoming prisoners. The ransom for a uniformed American service member would greatly benefit the groups terrorist activities.
The Haqqani Network generally does not release Westerners unless they receive a large payment. It would be hard to believe they would release Bergdahl in an exchange that does not directly benefit them, said Stockman.
Americans deserve to know if the President paid off a terrorist group, said Stockman.
Four of the five terrorist leaders Obama exchanged for Bergdaghl are Afghan Taliban, not Haqqani, according to Brad Thor. They also did not seek the release of a Haqqani commander in U.S. custody.
The Haqqani Network demanded ransoms for other high-profile captives, such as $5 million for Afghan diplomat Haji Khaliq Farahi and $15 million for New York Times journalist David Rohde. Farahi was freed for his ransom, while Rohde escaped before his ransom could be collected.
Their decision to hold Bergdahl themselves suggested to some terrorism experts the group was seeking a large payment for the American service member.
The fact that Bergdahl remains in his (Haqqani commander Mullah Sangeen Zadrans) custody and not in Miran Shah under Badruddins watch, suggests that Sangeen maintains considerable autonomy within the network and perhaps imagines he will directly earn a ransom payment in exchange for the American serviceman, writes Gretchen Peters of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in Haqqani Network Financing: The Evolution of an Industry.
The text of the letter to the White House follows:
June 5, 2014
President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
Mr. President:
Your agreement to release five dangerous Taliban leaders in exchange for U.S. Army Spc. Bowe Bergdahl has caused many Americans to doubt whether you have been truthful with Congress.
The release of terrorists is not the only part of the agreement raising concerns about White House actions that may violate the law or place service members in jeopardy.
As you know, the Haqqani Network, which held Bergdahl, is known for financing their terrorist operations through ransoming hostages. The Haqqani Network generally will not release a prisoner unless they also receive a substantial cash payment.
(Haqqani commander Mullah Sangeen Zadran) is believed to have orchestrated the kidnappings of Afghans and foreign nationals in his control zone, among them the captured U.S. soldier, Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl...The fact that Bergdahl remains in his custody and not in Miran Shah under Badruddins watch, suggests that Sangeen maintains considerable autonomy within the network and perhaps imagines he will directly earn a ransom payment in exchange for the American serviceman (emphasis added), writes Gretchen Peters of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in Haqqani Network Financing: The Evolution of an Industry.
The Haqqani Network demanded ransoms for other high-profile captives, such as $5 million for Afghan diplomat Haji Khaliq Farahi and $15 million for New York Times journalist David Rohde. Farahi was freed for his ransom, while Rohde escaped before his ransom could be collected.
It was also clear that Rohdes captors were motivated by financial self-interest and a desire to secure the release of Taliban prisoners, writes Peters. Bergdahl, a uniformed American service member, was an especially valuable asset to the Haqqani Network.
This has led to concerns the U.S. government, either directly or through a third party, agreed to cash payments as part of the Bergdahl exchange agreement.
I request full answers to the following questions:
1) Did Bergdahls captors, or anyone associated with his captivity, request renumeration in exchange for Berghdal?
2) Did you or anyone authorized by or associated with your Administration, authorize any form of compensation, direct or third party, in exchange for Bergdahl?
3) If you or anyone authorized by or associated with your Administration, authorized any form of compensation, direct or third party, in exchange for Bergdahl would you deny it?
4) Would you agree that cash payments to the Haqqani Network, by any party, assists the Network in carrying out violent and terrorist acts?
5) Would you agree that cash payments to the Haqqani Network, by any party, constitute material support to terrorists?
6) The late Michael Hastings, reporting for Rolling Stone in 2012, wrote, It (Bergdahls release) could be a huge win if Obama could bring him home, says a senior administration official familiar with the negotiations. Especially in an election year, if it's handled properly. Was the Bergdahl exchange agreement discussed with or shared with anyone on the White Houses political staff? What was the date and nature of the communication?
I request written answers to these questions within seven days of the date of this letter.
Sincerely,
STEVE STOCKMAN
Member of Congress
Member, House Foreign Affairs Committee
If he did, it wasn’t because he “had” to, it was because he wanted to!
I’ve heard we paid 5-6 million.
date: Feb 18, 2014: Obama administration 'to offer Taliban 5 Gitmo prisoners in exchange for last Afghanistan POW Bowe Bergdahl who has spent four years captive'
"The Taliban offered to release him in exchange for $1 million and 21 Afghan prisoners."
Sounds like the Mexican Government.
Aiding and abetting if true. This could be another historical first.
Good. The question needs to be asked and must be answered.
One thing though: “renumeration” isn’t a word, “remuneration” is.
1,2,4,3,5,6
1,2,3,4,5,6
“renumeration”
What does it matter? Congressional eunuchs won’t do anything about it.
The big guys response will be to give the letter to the irs and have them do something about it.....
Does the congressman really think we live in a constitutional republic, with a president who respects the constitution and the law?
“Why yes, Steve. I used taxpayer $$$ from the shovel-ready fund.”
The US has been paying the Haqqani network at least once a week for many many years for security of the overland resupply logistics network.
Not even an open secret, it’s been widely reported and documented etc for years and years.
Yeah yeah I thought of that :)
My guess is that if he was being held by the Haqqaini Network, then the 5 Terrorists were just cover for the ransom money. IOW the Terrorists were just released to cover up the fact that we paid these guys a huge ransom.
Personally I think Bergdahl was living the happy life of a Bedouin jihadist wannabe and doing his 5 daily prayer rug butt raises when he was asked to do a mission for Allah and found himself being handed over to the enemy.
He sure didn’t look like a happy camper when that helicopter arrived.
The US owed them room and board for taking care of this lost and confused soldier.
The Ghazi has a unlimited checkbook and will do whatever to aid his under privileged brethren , the poor downtrodden talliban who are seeking to destroy the west.
Actually the poor downtrodden muslims irrespective of where they may be
We can see that in his “trade” which had no benefit for America.
Brad Thor made this suggestion last Sunday, and Oliver North followed up with something similar on Tuesday or so.
I think this looks suspicious, as well. But, I don't think that even the Obama administration is going to admit to it, and hid any payment very deeply. It's probably not going through the US banking system at all: someone in FINCEN would find it and all it would take is one patriot to leak it.
Oliver North: I Know a Ransom of $5-6 Million Was Paid to Free Bergdahl
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/06/03/Oliver-North-I-Know-A-Ransom-5-6-Million-Was-Paid-to-Free-Bergdahl
In regards to the headline, my only comment is to link this other headline
When you pay for something you get more of it. Look at the Somalian pirate industry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.