Posted on 05/18/2014 12:00:13 AM PDT by Nachum
Preparing the propaganda pretext of the next battlespace, from the Daily Collectivist: "Cliven Bundy's American-hating Separatist thugs admit, on Facebook, that they aimed weapons at Federal agents with the intent to kill. In their online Facebook conversation, Bundy's Separatists admit three Oath Keepers positioned themselves high on a hill and put a 'bead on' the Federal agents below with the intent to kill those Federal agents.
As long as it is being used against Conservatives, yes they do.
+1
If the information about counter-snipers is true, then somebody on the Bundy side had a military frame of mind.
The federals are big believers in using snipers against unarmed people. However their “bravery” goes right out the window if they know that the second after they pull that trigger, a high velocity bullet will be heading their direction as well.
I suspect that if indeed there were snipers on the Bundy side, they were former sniper veterans who in their time had kill books with hundreds of events recorded in them.
And if that big, brave, federal sniper decided to kill some of Bundy’s supporters, not only he, but a lot of his fellow federals would be reclined on boards in front of the general store, like Old West badmen used to be. Somewhat the worse for wear.
It is as it should be,,,
“I think someone at BLM WANTED a shootout, to show the sheeple just who the boss was.”
I agree until they figured out they would be the shootee’s. Then everything changed and fast. Turn tail and run is the best expression for what the BLM decided to do when faced with righteous Americans and weapons.
The stazi don’t like a fair fight.
Who here believes the feds didn’t have a bead on the civilians? The government is power hungry madman coming after all of us.
If I aim at you with intent to kill you, you will die.
Providing over-watch, it’s your job to “keep a bead” on the bad guys and spot potential unknown bad guys.
Good job Patriots. My only regret was that I couldn’t make the trip personally.
III%
So far as Las Vegas Metro's deputies and their SWAT members are concerned, they figured out pretty quick that they all could become seriously dead if they were to appear as allies of the BLM. LV Metro didn't expect what they ran into and they had absolutely no intention of dying along with the FedGov thugs.
The combination of the LV Metro negotiations plus the word getting out on Harry and Rory Reid's land deals involving their toady at the BLM and its cozy relationship to Chinese energy firms, put the brakes on the shootout.
The BLM thugs on site at Bundy’s ranch all know how close they came to taking a permanent Dirt Nap — and they are scared. Their masters in administrative positions aren't concerned about the “boots on the ground” other than to take orders. They will order their BLM thugs back into action, but the thugs know who's going to die in any shootout they provoke. Bottom line is that none of the BLM thugs will walk away from such a shootout; The BLM thugs know they'll be wiped out to the last BLM thug.
>>I thought Bundy didn’t recognize that the federal government existed. <<
Bundy doesn’t acknowledge Federal; authority over public lands that are within state borders.
and their uniforms and logos will become targets across the west.
And, the Feds will remember this forever! Every situation is likely to be the same from here on out, thanks to the OKs and others like them.
"Cliven Bundy's Thugs: 'We Had a "Bead On The" Feds With Intent to Kill Them.'"
Let's see how the Daily Cossacks like this...
""Baraq 0bama's Thugs: 'We Had a "Bead On The" Americans With Intent to Kill Them.'"
Think about it Daily Cossacks, what was Kent St. really all about?
5.56mm
Just noticed your tag line. H2O2 is great for many applications, not just medicine.
;^)
5.56mm
Mid-term or general?
That's not what he said but then again he seems to spend a lot of time trying to explain what he meant in his last sound bite.
What’s so shocking? Maintaining the American People’s ability to kill federal goons is the PURPOSE of the Second Amendment.
Yep. I’m afraid I can’t disagree. Personally, I wouldn’t relish putting a bullet in any of those thugs but if one of them was on fire, I wouldn’t p*ss on them to put it out.
indeed. or this:
[watch for a ] Gleiwitz 3, 2, 1.
from a comment at Sipsey Street
Wonder why someone from the left taking crazy meds hasn’t decided to send a message to the media and the agitators before now? Talking about soft targets...
TeamSarah4Choice? Who is this Nimrod?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.