Posted on 04/26/2014 12:31:19 AM PDT by expat1000
Forget the current polling as between Hillary and Elizabeth Warren. It pits Hillary against someone who “isn’t running.”
For all my criticisms of Warren, and they are extensive, I am convinced that if she ran, she would crush Hillary, just as Obama did.
Warren, as did Obama, has a unique ability to demagogue the core Democratic narrative of victimhood in ways that would make Hillary blush. She is more cunning than Hillary, more popular with the base, would bring an excitement the contrived Ready-for-Hillary movement could only dream of. Democrats may be “ready” for Hillary, but they don’t really want her.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
They are both utterly *uckin’ useless, and completely without talent, insight, skill or knowledge of anything.
America just is not producing anything remarkable in terms of human resources and hasn’t for quite some time.
Hillary got foiled last time by Massachusetts, where Obama got kickstarted - they will be more than happy to do it again.
So, in short, Elizabeth’s greatest recommendation is that she is an articulate and cunning linguist? Quele surprise!
I don’t think Warren can beat Hillary, and she has already all but endorsed Clinton II anyways.
Hillary doesn’t strike me as the type of person who would run a bad campaign twice, not when she knows that she came close to winning anyways last time.
Warren is terrible at speeches, with a teleprompter and without. Obama can at least read loudly without stopping. Warren can’t do even that.
And Warren is a older white female, in the same category as Hillary. Obama was black, automatically getting most of the black vote.
Hillary will eat her lunch if she runs.
Old Liz would be well advised to steer clear of sharp objects and open windows for the next two years. Remember the Fort Marcy Airline incident with Obama?
I vote for the better looking womb, but that’s just me.
Palin is my choice.
2016 is shaping up to be a real hoot!
Count on the likes of John Boehner to blow it anyway.
If the Race Card worked for Zer0, get ready for the Woman Card to be played against the Republicans.
Granny Warren Vs Grandma Hillary 2016, are you ready to rumble! The fake Indian is an accomplished lying sack of shit but she would be on a trail of tears going up against the Hildabeast, the most pathological liar in politiks in our lifetime...
The media would crucify any male GOP candidate for being sexist if he cleaned Hillary’s clock during a debate.
They are both total frauds and as intellectually dishonest as a person can be
“Hillary got foiled last time by Massachusetts, where Obama got kickstarted - they will be more than happy to do it again.”
Yeah, Teddy’s obituary should read “I screwed Hillary, got her good!”.
“So, in short, Elizabeth’s greatest recommendation is that she is an articulate and cunning linguist? Quele surprise!”
Well...., she speaks Cherokee, doesn’t she?
Scum both of them
This is what happens to a country that lets the media choose its presidential candidates….people who were the bottom of the barrel in intelligence and talent, so they wound up in the media.
“The media would crucify any male GOP candidate for being sexist if he cleaned Hillary’s clock during a debate.”
We are now in the period in the presidential cycle where the candidates begin positioning themselves and generate background noise in the media. On the GOP side Jeb Bush, Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz are out generating noise. Chris Christie appears to have been sidelined by the bridge gate scandal. Scott Walker is virtually unseen and may be distracted by a criminal investigation into his campaign financing activities.
On the Democrat side all of the buzz is about Warren and Hillary. While Cuomo and O’Malley may from an experience perspective be viable candidates they are not getting the low level media coverage they need to put their names in the public spotlight on a continuous basis they need in order to generate top of mind awareness in the average voter’s mind. Biden has received some press with respect to 2016 but doesn’t seem to be considered a serious contender.
The absence of buzz regarding male democrat consenters and the ongoing discussion of Hillary and Warren suggests the Democrat establishment will put a female on the top of the ticket in 2016 because they know it will be an almost certain win. Add a virtually unknown Hispanic to the ticket as the VP and it is very doubtful a fractured Republican Party can win. Conservative males will stay home if Jeb heads the ticket. Moderate GOP females will vote for Hillary or Warren if Cruz heads the Republican ticket and is painted as anti abortion and therefore anti-female.
Unless Benghazi gets traction, or she has a health issue, the Dem candidate will be Hillary. Likely due to Hillary’s age, there is concern something could happen from a health perspective between now an the election. Warren is the insurance policy. The current buzz seems to be all about putting her into position to head the ticket should Hillary have to drop out.
Demographics have consequences. In 2016 there will be fewer white male voters and more minority voters. White women will continue to be the key demographic. The “war on women” campaign theme continues to be very effective for the Democrats in swaying white female voters. The Democrats would be foolish not to run in 2016 with a female at the top of the ticket.
It’s a sad editorial on our times that this lying, cheating, affirmative action faux native American can do anything more than ask if I “would like fries with that”
Would we have to run a fake cowboy against her?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.