Posted on 04/23/2014 8:10:09 AM PDT by marktwain
The Popular Mechanics article shows that it understands technology much better than the New York Times or the Washington Post. This isn't too surprising, given the politics of the the two prominent newspapers, but it was not always so.
The Article sums it up nicely:
So, should we be afraid to live in a world where anyone can afford the equipment to manufacture a gun in his or her basement? I hope not—because that's the world we live in now. Guns are comparatively simple devices. In fact, plenty of custom firearms are manufactured today using equipment that wouldn't be out of place in a basement.The utility of 3D printed guns is not so much that they make the technology of firearms available to everyman; that has been the case for centuries. The utility is that it demonstrates that fact in a way that resonates with those in the "progressive elite", especially in the old media, that they were blind to otherwise.
A nice configuration but it is really only good for one thing. It’s akin to a “Liberator” 45 ACP gun dropped into France prior to the invasion. Meant to be used for up close dispatching of Nazi guards, etc.
Where government gets antsy about this technology today is that they cannot detect these with metal detectors. One assumes the bullet could be secreted elsewhere as in that Clint Eastwood movie where he was up against assassin John Malkovich.
For my part, I’d rather have something capable of full and sustained power over a lengthy time.
A nice configuration but it is really only good for one thing. It’s akin to a “Liberator” 45 ACP gun dropped into France prior to the invasion. Meant to be used for up close dispatching of Nazi guards, etc.
Where government gets antsy about this technology today is that they cannot detect these with metal detectors. One assumes the bullet could be secreted elsewhere as in that Clint Eastwood movie where he was up against assassin John Malkovich.
For my part, I’d rather have something capable of full and sustained power over a lengthy period of time.
A nice configuration but it is really only good for one thing. It’s akin to a “Liberator” 45 ACP gun dropped into France prior to the invasion. Meant to be used for up close dispatching of Nazi guards, etc.
Where government gets antsy about this technology today is that they cannot detect these with metal detectors. One assumes the bullet could be secreted elsewhere as in that Clint Eastwood movie where he was up against assassin John Malkovich.
For my part, I’d rather have something capable of full and sustained power over a lengthy period of time.
I’m thinking a lot fewer of them have operated a printer than this author may realize. It’s been my experience that many higher ups are averse to clicking on print buttons. As soon as the get promoted, they think someone else needs to do all their printing, and they take more time explaining what they want printed than it would take to print it themselves. Since those in dinosaur media were promoted before current printing tech, they probably never do it.
It’s a step in the right direction. We need this technology to develop further though. Eventually, affordable 3D metal printers will come around and then they’ll truly have something to worry about.
Yes. And I applaud the freedom we should have to do it. That said, there are many ways to make a gun given a few simple machines. It all depends on just how stealthy you want to make them. That’s where it gets tricky.
Use the output as a model for sand casting. Then cast the pistol frame in a home foundry. That is quite doable.
The output does not pass through metal detectors but functions well.
Look at the number of people who take an 80% AR lower and build their own weapon. It is not cheap, but it is done every day. And in most places is perfectly legal.
I have two words for you: trigger. groups.
If people can make a printed “Liberator “ pistol people can make what is called a “WELROD pistol” & that really scares the politicians. look up the WELROD pistol on google 8*>.
can a pair of croc shoes be printed?
the second that happens, and entire corporation ceases to exist.
I thought the article was good;not so much from the standpoint that anyone is going to print such a great gun using that technology,but just the idea that it offers to guard against those who oppose our Second Amendment rights.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.