Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

So what am I doing up so early? Call it an insomnia attack.
1 posted on 03/28/2014 3:06:04 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Xenalyte; RMDupree; AlexW; CzarNicky; Mike Fieschko; motzman; codercpc; thingumbob; tje; ml1954; ...

PING!


2 posted on 03/28/2014 3:07:04 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (ObamaCare unsubsidized PAID Enrollment Prediction: 66,666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

What’s written on DU doesn’t stay on DU.

Early morning top 10


4 posted on 03/28/2014 3:12:38 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
I find it incredibly ironic that DUmmies think one loses objectivity when they call a democratic president names...like a POS....but to call Bush that name was considered perfectly proper dialogue.

Top 10.

5 posted on 03/28/2014 3:15:56 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Wow, has the Pittster lost one of his red stars. Surly he is not suffering from brief moments of mental clarity.


7 posted on 03/28/2014 3:21:33 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Maybe Pitt would have had better luck if he had gone after Obama’s idiotic comment about the Kosovo “referendum”.


9 posted on 03/28/2014 3:49:00 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
These things clearly take a lot of work to post. Thanks for taking the time.

What I find interesting is that WRP is just being consistent in his views - that waging war on anybody is wrong. When he called the President names in one of his posts, the DUmmies reacted to that rather than what he's saying.

The most shocking part of the whole thing is that any Leftist is capable of consistent thought.

10 posted on 03/28/2014 3:57:53 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (The question of our age is whether a majority of Americans can and will vote us all into slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
Trashing President Obama is against the DU rules - a banning offense.

The cult of DU unreal.

11 posted on 03/28/2014 4:35:50 AM PDT by erod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
Goodbye, Mr. Pitts

Robert Donat's Mr. Chips was 83 when he passed away. Will Mr. Pitts make it to 83?

12 posted on 03/28/2014 5:11:11 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
But if we are going to prevent people insulting the President, it should be the office, not the person. This means, regardless of occupant, you do not hurl insults, and do not call either man a used car salesman. Of course, you are also asking an editorial writer not to do what is in the fine tradition of editorial writers going back to oh Washington. Do not, I repeat this, do not, read editorials from the civil war, for example. They will make you blush. Trust me, this one is mild. I know, that is a fine distinction many here do not understand. One of multiple reasons I keep real meat out of this place anymore.

This means, regardless of occupant, you do not hurl insults, - - - Was that rule in effect in place when W was the president? I don't remember DU holding back on insults during the Bush years.

13 posted on 03/28/2014 5:24:41 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

For the first time in years, I went to the DUmp yesterday and saw this thread. I don’t know why I did it, but I googled Nadine. I found a picture of her on her Disqus account.

I will not post it here, it is something that should never be seen! =8-/


15 posted on 03/28/2014 6:47:39 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

These posters apparently have no problem with corruption and ineptitude of the administration if they say insulting Obama is a banning offense..


16 posted on 03/28/2014 7:33:45 AM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
These posts are disruptive to healthy discussion.

This is the DUmmies' reaction to the First Amendment.

18 posted on 03/28/2014 9:24:22 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

If an invasion and ten-year occupation isn’t annexation, then nothing is.


Liberals have such trouble with the definition of words. I suppose a rock solid definition mitigates their ability to twist words into different meanings.

Annexation: The permanent acquisition and incorporation of some territorial entity into another geo-political entity

Do we lay claim to owning Iraq, permanently? Is Iraq a part of the US? A 51st state? A territory? No? Then they weren’t annexed.


19 posted on 03/28/2014 10:33:18 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (I'd use the /S tag but is it really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
I'm just hoping that maybe next time, when you or anyone else on DU is thinking about starting a thread in which you insult the president, you think about those of us who don't really appreciate it.

Really, do I need to make in-line correction for that?
Well, yes:

I'm just hoping that maybe next time, when you or anyone else on DU is thinking about starting a thread in which you insult the current, popularly elected president born-of African-Slave Trade heritage, you think about those of us who toe-the party line of "race-card politics" while being comfortable in our "whitey world" of guilt free existence since we voted for the jig*" don't really appreciate it.
On the other-hand, If the POTUS is a narrowly elected, doughy-white, Protestant Republican, well, let's insult him in every way possible using terms like "Chimpy BusHitler and Shrub.

*Admin Moderator: Since the "N-word" is no longer socially/politically appropriate, I simply assume that other terms that are ^not in the "cross-hairs" of main-stream social media^ can be used for the shock effect. To date, I have not seen any "burial" or extreme prejudice of the term "jig" or "jig-a-boo" which many of the so-called progressives in the American Northeast still use.
(Really! go to a Brooklyn pub...)
Summarily, as long as the "n-word" is not used, every other term is fair, right? Send me FReep-mail to discuss?

22 posted on 03/29/2014 6:29:13 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The Acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
These posts are disruptive to healthy discussion.
(ROTFLMAO!) Exsqueeze me DUmmie? Here's your typical DUnnie 'healthy discussion':
-- I Love Obama.
----- Me too!
----- Me three!
----- Me four!
-- I love him even more than you all!!
----- No you don't, I REALLY--REALLY LOVE him!!
-------- Oh yes I do.
----------- Oh no you don't.
-- You're all wrong, I LUV him the most...and want to have his baby!
----- Okay...knock it off it, Ben Birch.
..> Thread Closed <..

Stoo-Pid Libtards.

23 posted on 03/29/2014 10:47:52 AM PDT by Condor51 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson