"homosexual sex is fabulous, wherever it’s found. It’s fine, virtuous, gives you a good smell, gives you a good taste, makes you speak the truth, and gives you wisdom, knowledge and understanding. It’s so good that schools are teaching little kids that the anus is a sexual organ.
On the other hand, all heterosexual sex is rape. Homosexual men are paragons of virtue, unless they’re Catholic priests, of course. Homosexual Boy Scout leaders are the bomb. Heterosexual men? Monsters, I tell you! Monsters!"
The generational backlash will be massive when it happens.
The world is full of looney tunes. I just finished reading a terrifying photo album titled “The Best of Tumblr’s LGBT”.
I thought I knew all of the latest whackjob trends, but damn, learn something new every day.
To define homosexual sex as rape would be homophobic.
In the future, I see a lot of forms for teenagers to fill out.
Pretty well sums up the libtard mindset: they are constantly pushing sex, then reacting when the fruit of their sales pitch blooms.
And people wonder why Putin is flexing his muscles.
As a lawyer who has handled rape and sexual harassment cases, I can’t imagine how.
Think civil settlements. Millions of "pre-convicted" men would have much more incentive to agree to making direct wealth transfers to members and acolytes of feminist Left with such a law in place.
A lawyer should understand this game - variants of it have already been routinely played in every sphere of American life for the last four decades.
Man holds knife to woman’s neck, turns on iPhone recorder. Demands that the woman states for the record that the sex is consensual. He concurs.
It’s on the record - who’s to say it was not rape?
Whatever happened to taking responsibility for ones actions? I suspect the bad ol' days, mistakes and all, were a lot more fun than it is today.
So if neither party manifiests the above defined "affirmative consent" (as is usually the case) how do you determine who is the "rapist" and who is the "victim"? Or are they both guilty of rape?
This is probably aimed at making it easier to prove a crime against those who sleep with someone who might have had too much to drink or almost passed out. That’s already illegal (can be tough to prove) and all this does is make new felons out of thousands who don’t even know it.
This comes from raging man-hating feminazis. Naturally, they would not criminalize carpet munching.
Isn't that a marriage license?
Also--who's the rapist and who's the rapee--or are they both both? If it's a threesome, are they all three rapers and rapees? This is going to get complicated.
Leave it to California. If it can be harebrained, it will be harebrained.
Why are they always hyphenated?
Any CA college guy looking for ‘some’ who doesn’t carry a recording device on him at all times is a fool. Get the girl to assent to the pending liaison and record her saying it. I fear that even that would not get a young man clear of these lunatics.
The hilarity of this is obvious.
There are all sorts of ridiculous things out there this could promulgate.
A statement affirming heterosexual only status, and that at no time do they consent to any form of homosexual act.
A statement that unless they are unconscious, if they believe an act is rape, they will loudly yell “rape!” before it happens. This is done with the understanding that if the other person or people stop what they are doing, the act will not be considered rape.
A statement that at no time will they voluntary submit to or carry out any form of bondage, especially any type involving a gag. That they also reject any act of sadism or masochism.
A statement that they believe heterosexual sex involves a penis and a vagina. No anal sex. No oral sex.
And finally a statement that they believe that the purpose of sex is for procreation, not entertainment.
(Can you imagine the total freak out such statements would cause among leftists?)
Fornication is named as a sin for a reason.
So its now “Mother may I” mating or “Simon Said” sex ?!?
This leads in so many directions.
How good is a verbal contract?
Over what time frame is consent valid?
How old do you need to be to give consent?
How many witnesses do you need?
If unwanted consent is given, what are the consequences of not fulfilling the contract?
Do the consentees need to speak the same language?
Can the deaf legally have sex?
Better videotape the deposition when the woman “consents” to have sex. Otherwise it could become a “he claims/she said” thing for the authorities...