follow the line of his shoulders. It looks to me like the right arm is simply closer to the surface than the left.
Both his arms are clearly reaching up. The arm by his back is darker than his arms.
And there's the problem right there. I don't know what you mean by that statement, but I do know what I think I can see.
For you to make yourself clear, you need to caption the image with a statement of WHAT IT IS YOU THINK YOU SEE.
follow the line of his shoulders. It looks to me like the right arm is simply closer to the surface than the left.
For another example, each time this image is shown, and I have no way of knowing, while I'm looking at it, over what period of time the numerous similar stills were taken, it seems that this person isn't moving in any way, their arms don't appear to move nor do the legs seem to change position, so it's a safe bet to assume this person isn't treading water and isn't conscious. That's what made me think it might be Fuddy. Her arm shows up as white, that's because the light falls in that direction, but her back is in shadow, so the garment appears to be dark.
The jacket is barely sufficient to hold her head out of the water, and if she's lucky, it's doing what it was designed to do, keep her face out of the water and stop her from drowning. The jacket needs to be fastened across her back to stay on, and what you see across her back is part of the jacket, therefor it's the same colour.
Is it Fuddy? I have no way of knowing.
There’s also a hint of that purple pattern on the shoulder in that previous image I posted. That might indicate it’s Fuddy.
I almost fell off my chair when I saw the stills shot *underwater* without surface distortion from waves or refraction.
It is possible to manufacture 1/2 length, 1/8 volume approx,
Aqualungs.
http://www.bizrate.com/scuba-diving-snorkeling-equipment/miniature-air-tanks/
I still think the first youtube “diver” is fuddy struggling on the surface, but the second is totally more difficult to explain away.
The “apparatus,” or “debris-stuff” under Fuddy, is very strange.I need people with diving experience to say what that stuff is, since I am a confirmed land locked freeper :-)
If the administration were going to stage a disappearance from a simulated crash, with the pilot in on the deception as well as Yamamoto and Fuddy, but not the other passengers, then Fuddy would need to be “still on the plane when it went down in deep water” and the real live Woman evacuated a distance by diver so a Navy Helicopter can pick her up separately.
But correct me if I am wrong, wasn't there immediate initial media noise about Fuddy still being on board, and the plane sinking in deep water?? I distinctly remember it.
What we could have is a attempted fake death by “going down with the plane”, only to have the poor Lady have a heart condition activate and die in the water.
Assuming Fuddy is dead of a heart condition, then the failed “witness protection program entry” would result is a perfectly normal Catholic Funeral service with an open casket.
Are you talking about the image Fred posted in 195?
Because I see both of his arms and they are not reaching up. His left is down by his waist and his right is straight out and almost parallel to the surface. He looks to me like someone treading water in the ocean.