Posted on 02/24/2014 6:03:02 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama
Recently, Ted Nugent made the Authoritarian Left go into convulsions by calling our Jew hating Dog Eater in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, a "mongrel" and "subhuman". Not one to rest on his laurels, Nugent also compared Obama's administration to the Third Reich.
Needless to say, I completely agree with Mr. Nugent. The pile of human debris that has usurped the White House is indeed the lowest form of life on this planet. However, this column isn't about Ted Nugent or defending his comments. This column, like so many others that I've written, is about the utter cowardice of the Republican Party in CONgress.
In Chairman Obama, we have the most vile of villains. He's a murderer, as evidenced by his unconstitutional attack on Libya that helped the Islamonazi Muslim Brotherhood take control. He's armed al-Qaeda in Syria and drug cartels in Mexico. He's a race-baiter who did his best to help inflame the Trayvon Martin fiasco. His lies have cost cancer patients their care. His thugs in the NSA are monitoring our phone calls and rifling through our email, while the Internal Revenue Stasi is silencing dissent.
And yet, for the most part, aside from a select few (and we all know who they are), the Republicans in CONgress have remained silent.
Now, of course, I realize that sitting CONgress critters can't go around calling the President of the United States a "subhuman" (unless they're a Dhimmicrat and George W. Bush is in the White House, then it's ok), but just once, couldn't Republicans just pretend they have a spine and call Obama what he is---a fascist? I know that takes more than what the Republican'ts have, but the evidence is everywhere. Obama doesn't give a damn about freedom or liberty. He doesn't give a damn about the Constitution. So, really, what are they afraid of? A negative piece in the New York Slimes? Finger wagging from Will McAvoy (aka Bill O'Reilly)? Being forced to look at pictures of a nude Joyless Behar shaving Rachel Maddcow's legs, perhaps?
Ladies and gentlemen, the bottom line is this: We the People don't need Ted Nugent to "speak truth to power", although I'm glad he did and I support what he said, every word of it. We the People need the Muppets we send to CONgress every two years to call a swastika a swastika.
We’re on the edge of complete economic, political, and social disaster. Other than that, all is well.
:)
Try directly defending calling Obama a “mongrel”?
Are you up to that?
Does assigning that label to humman being say something about the person using the label?
Yeah, and it’s Ted Nugent. We’ll have enough mud thrown on us, we don’t need it from him. I wish he’d get it over with and run for office, because (unlike he certifiable Jesse Ventura) he’d have his ass handed to him, and maybe go home and shut up. I like that he’s a hunter and a meat-eater, but politically he’s a boat anchor.
Like I said earlier, Obama lost his right long ago to even consider calling himself a human being. Human beings don’t push to enact legislation to let babies die after surviving an abortion. Human beings don’t persecute nuns, as Obama is doing with, of all people, The Sisters of the Poor.
And not for nothing, you’re defending a racist dirt bag who called his own grandmother a “typical white person”.
Should we say “m-word” instead of “mongrel”?
I’ll be the first to admit that sometimes Nugent goes off...er,uh, the plot of land. At the same time, I respect that he has fighting spirit, something the Republican’t Party as a whole no longer has.
I can guarantee you this will be forgotten in a week. The arrogant and lazy media has the attention span of a gnat on LSD.
True. John Dingell is heading off to the nursing home, after all.
:)
When the Demagogic Party wants to revive this during the campaign, the Partisan Media Shills will oblige. Perry’s public response may have been about right.
For the record, I’m NOT “defending” anybody or any thing.
I AM criticizing the use of the racist term “mongrel”.
It does not matter what “he” did.
When YOU use the term, you lose the legitimacy of all ideological and policy criticism.
Get it?
You have got me there, FRiend.
Thanks A.N. Shared opposition to Zero, his racism, his cronies, his racist cronies, and all of his policies, is a big reason I like FR. :’)
“I AM criticizing the use of the racist term ‘mongrel’.”
The word “mongrel” is no more racist than the word “macaca”.
“When YOU use the term, you lose the legitimacy of all ideological and policy criticism.”
Absolutely not. One, Conservatism is NOT an ideology. It is the application of common sense. Conservatives don’t believe in anything political, they only believe in the real world, or what Rush Limabaugh calls “Literalville”. We support the Constitution because we know it works. We support lower taxes because we know it grows the economy. We’re pro-life because we know abortion murders children. We could go on and on.
And secondly, two and two always make four, no matter what. Putting something in a not-so nice way (to some) doesn’t change the legitimacy of what’s actually said. For example:
***
2+2=4
2+2=4, ya big dope! (Hat tip Mark Levin)
***
Neither one of those statements are incorrect, are they?
Please don’t take this wrong way and see this as a personal attack, but it’s attitudes like yours is one of the big reasons why Obummer is stinking up the White House in the first place. Now I’ll be the first to admit that Ted Nugent goes overboard. I admitted as much to Sunkenciv elsewhere on this thread. At the same time, we can’t fight politically by Marquess of Queensbury Rules while the Authoritarian Left uses brass knuckles. Juan McLame did and lost. Mitt Trotsky did and lost. Sometimes you just gotta get dirty.
And it’s a great place to have a FRiendly debate!
:)
So far, my record against you in debates is 0-3. I’ll win one eventually, dagnabit!
The word “mongrel” is no more racist than....
You are WRONG!!!
On all counts!
Yes, he is. But now we have to put up with his 27-years-younger wife, who just happens to be running for his seat.
Democrats never go away. They just hang around filling “legacy” and “dynasty” seats.
Your leftist political correctness is getting very annoying.
You answer a well-thought-out post by the OP (courtesy ping), your debating opponent, by interrupting it after a few words, and you present no argument refuting it other than the leftist “You are WRONG!!!”
Three exclamation points show a childish mind.
This isn’t a schoolyard where “Are too!” is a valid argument, so stop treating it like one. Your opinions are yours. Please stop trying to make everyone bow down to your untenable PC rules.
There is nothing racist about the word, “mongrel,” and a whole slew of other words we “aren’t allowed” to say. If you’re so into controlling what others say, perhaps you aren’t on a web site that it right for you.
Just a gentle suggestion. I’m not forcing anything here, unlike you.
So the bottom line is that you need to have a thick skin around here because we attract all kinds - including knuckleheads and racists.
“There is nothing racist about the word, “mongrel,”
You clearly missed my prior posts.
As for your assertion above:
Mongrel is a term applied a dog of mixed breed.
To associate that term to a person of mixed race IS “racist” on it’s face, by vitue of equating them to dogs.
There is nothing “leftist” about this assertion.
This is NOT about “policitcal correctness”.
Attempts to discredit an individual by assigning them animal traits, is as juvenial as your “are to” reference.
If you find that point of departure as “untenable”, it is YOU who have defined the limits of your mental capacity.
It also verifies that you have no substantive basis for your policy differences. Thus, you have lost your seat in any meaningful discussion, as your viewpoint is dismissed out of hand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.