Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Grand Jury refuses to indict homeowner in shooting death of sheriff’s deputy
Coach is Right ^ | 2/11/14 | Doug Book

Posted on 02/11/2014 8:55:45 AM PST by Oldpuppymax

In December of last year, members of the Burleson County, Texas SWAT team executed a pre-dawn, no-knock warrant by breaking through the door of Henry Goedrich Magee’s mobile home. Believing criminals to have broken in, Magee picked up a rifle positioned near his bedroom door and fired, killing county Sheriff’s Deputy Adam Sowders. Charged with capital murder, Magee faced the prospect of either life in prison without parole or death by lethal injection.

On February 5th, “…the 21st Judicial District Grand Jury returned a No Bill on Capital Murder charges against Henry Goedrick Magee.” That is, the Grand Jury refused to indict Magee for capital murder, deciding there was...

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Local News; Society
KEYWORDS: 4thamendment; banglist; grandjury; henrymagee; lawandlegal

1 posted on 02/11/2014 8:55:46 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Note to self: Don’t bash through someone’s door late at night without introducing myself first. I might get justifiably shot.


2 posted on 02/11/2014 9:05:21 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

SWAT Teams? Militarization of Law Enforcement?

Prescriptions for more of this.

Should they have arrested and charged this guy? Well that depends on other evidence, but probably.

Evidently the Grand Jury decided the use of force was unjustified. Now that does fall back on the individual who actually issued the “no knock” warrant.


3 posted on 02/11/2014 9:05:41 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

The cops went in cocked and locked and it cost one of their own his life.
It’s as if police departments have shiny new toys and they can’t wait to use them.
Stupid, stupid, stupid. And completely unnecessary. No one’s life was in danger. A couple of cops in a car could have just waited for him to go to the store. But no, they have to go in balls to the wall because they’re the police and they go anywhere they want at any time. Why? Just to show that they can. And in Texas, too. That was really smart.

What if the tip had been worthless? What if they had been busting into the wrong trailer? This wasn’t a terrorist cell. It was a guy with a bunch of weed. Did he deserve to go to jail? Yep. But not for shooting the cop in the dark.


4 posted on 02/11/2014 9:06:39 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Memo to Grand Jury Members:

Stay out of Burleson. The blues will be looking for you.


5 posted on 02/11/2014 9:12:40 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

There should have been no arrest, no prosecution, no trial!!!!!

When the cops break into the ‘wrong’ house and shoot the old deaf guy with a TV remote that they call a gun they are not arrested prosecuted or tried!

Fed up with fascism.


6 posted on 02/11/2014 9:23:03 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Another victim of the WOD.


7 posted on 02/11/2014 9:24:51 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Correct on all things you said.

Remember, David Koresh? The police could have nabbed him numerous times as he went into town for supplies. Instead, they tried to do a raid on his compound with disastrous results during the raid and after the siege. SWAT should only be used where armed resistance has already happened or is likely to occur. I don’t know how frequent the police use “no knocks”, but I suspect it is far too frequent.


8 posted on 02/11/2014 9:26:17 AM PST by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters for Freedom and Rededication to the Principles of the U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

The guy was really into weed? Why haven’t we heard from Obammer on this one then? This guy could have also been one of Barack’s sons if he loves weed so well! We may need a new executive order to arm weed users against sheriff’s deputies because these weed-lovers are potentially sons of Obammer.


9 posted on 02/11/2014 9:38:31 AM PST by Repent and Believe (Promote good. Tolerate the harmless. Let evil be crushed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
I feel the need to point out the obvious here. The reason SWAT is called in for a "no-knock" warrant is usually because there is confidence that any and all approaches will result in a dangerous confrontation. That does not suggest there is any LESS risk with a "no-knock" invasion vs. an announced warrant and search. That is why SWAT wears body armor and is heavily armed. They are prepared for a gunfight. The "no-knock" variety of serving a warrant is to give the LEO a tactical advantage (surprise!). The risks are inherent. An evaluation of the risks is what LEO and a judge must consider when allowing this approach.

In this case, a misdemeanor offender was waken in the middle of the night by having his door bashed in. I doubt his first thought was, "It's the police wanting my bag of pot!". That the man lives in a trailer that can be surrounded and staked out is the obvious evidence of complete failure in the decision and issuance of a "no-knock" warrant.

I can only surmise that the over zealous LEO are looking for reasons to use their expensive toys. In this case it got an officer killed. And Texans seem to understand the issue (at least at the grand jury level).

10 posted on 02/11/2014 9:43:58 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (My whimsical litany of satyric prose and avarice pontification of wisdom demonstrates my concinnity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas

Remember, David Koresh?

********

Interesting you mention Koresh. McGee is being represented by Dick DeGuerin,
the same attorney that represented Koresh.


11 posted on 02/11/2014 10:15:19 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Really really surprised that that guy lived to tell his side of the story to a grand jury.


12 posted on 02/11/2014 10:22:29 AM PST by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a nice way of saying martial law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
Earlier threads about the rbrmy if anyone is interesed

Man Charged With Killing Burleson County Deputy No Billed by Grand Jury

Deputy killed as SWAT Team breaks through door to serve “No Knock” warrant ^


Texas man will NOT be charged for fatal shooting of sheriff's deputy ^


13 posted on 02/11/2014 10:31:17 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
There should have been no arrest, no prosecution, no trial!!!!!

Calm down there Hoss. Read the whole post. There was no prosecution for murder, not even an indictment, and no trial for that crime. Magee was justifiably charged with possession of weed. He is not a deaf old man with a remote watching TV. He is a drug dealer. As the report said:

the Burleson County Sheriff’s Office would not have been there that day if Mr. Magee had not decided to live a lifestyle of doing and producing illegal drugs in his home. Therefore, we will fully prosecute the drug charges against him.

I am not saying the cops were justified in their approach; this sort of thing has to stop. One way to reduce the chances of this happening to you is do not deal dope out of your trailer.

14 posted on 02/11/2014 10:33:57 AM PST by Chuckster (The longer I live the less I care about what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chuckster
You're quite correct.

With the prosecution of these charges, there is one less illegal drug distributor in business. (Market improves for remaining free market capitalists.)

With the death of the deputy, there is one less armed statist kicking in the doors of citizens. (Insert Solzhenitsyn quote.)

Both are regrettable. The death, of course, more so than the market adaptation. Yet the loss of life here will not be in vain, as it will fundamentally increase the boldness and vigor with which men will defend their homes against the murderous tyranny of the State.

And that is a good change.
15 posted on 02/11/2014 11:02:17 AM PST by Robert Teesdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Just for good measure the guy should trespass onto the late deputy’s property and shoot his dog for barking.


16 posted on 02/11/2014 11:22:27 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson