1 posted on
02/09/2014 10:47:23 AM PST by
kristinn
To: kristinn
Does anyone expect the Marxist Media to question their messiah?
Pray America Wakes Up
2 posted on
02/09/2014 10:52:22 AM PST by
bray
(The Republic of Texas: www.braylog.com/id47.html)
To: kristinn
I figure he was high during the whole Benghazi episode.
3 posted on
02/09/2014 10:53:25 AM PST by
isom35
To: kristinn
Certainly no fan of the Prez, but I don't think he was stoned.
4 posted on
02/09/2014 10:53:49 AM PST by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: kristinn
6 posted on
02/09/2014 11:10:43 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: kristinn
Or he is getting ready to have a cerebral vascular accident.
7 posted on
02/09/2014 11:11:53 AM PST by
Excellence
(All your database are belong to us.)
To: kristinn
8 posted on
02/09/2014 11:14:02 AM PST by
Renegade
To: kristinn
1. I don’t think Obama is high. That’s stupid.
2. I don’t know what pisses me off more. Bob Costas pretending to be a sports journalist, or Bob Costas pretending to be a political journalist.
3. The things Obama cares about are not the things I care about.
9 posted on
02/09/2014 11:24:00 AM PST by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
To: kristinn
If this had been President George W. Bush, who owned up to problems with alcohol as a young married man and quit drinking, the media would have been all over him last night and would be demanding answers from the White House today. Hey, what do you expect, half the White House press corp is stoned.
[Disclaimer: I don't know that for a fact, but I've seen some of them close up].
5.56mm
14 posted on
02/09/2014 11:51:17 AM PST by
M Kehoe
To: kristinn
Oh no! It looks like he’s “evolving” again! This time on his opinion of “recreational” marijuana.
15 posted on
02/09/2014 12:21:29 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(ObamaCare. The "global warming" of healthcare plans.)
To: kristinn
18 posted on
02/09/2014 1:24:04 PM PST by
vrwc54
To: kristinn
Proof that he was high would be that his answers made sense.
19 posted on
02/09/2014 1:34:24 PM PST by
DPMD
To: kristinn
I seem to recall something to the effect that all gub-mint workers in sensitive positions are subject to urinalysis on suspicion of intoxication? DOT has all CDL holders, private and public service liable, and we don`t even carry the “football”.
22 posted on
02/09/2014 3:11:56 PM PST by
nomad
To: All
24 posted on
02/09/2014 3:24:27 PM PST by
kristinn
(Welcome to the Soviet States of Obama)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson