[cuban leaf]

Actually, the original article does ask some good questions and makes some good points, e.g.:

“A much better question, one that should have occurred to every Obama-hating producer at Fox News, is this: “Mr. President, can you provide one example of when you held someone specifically accountable for a major screwup? One example? Over five years?” And if Obama prevaricated, then O’Reilly could have asked Obama why he seems to go out of his way not to hold his political appointees publicly accountable for mistakes of omission or commission.

But instead, O’Reilly entered the imaginary world of conspiracies and cover-ups and let the president off easy.”

He’s right.

[USS Alaska]

After the obligatory liberal attack on Fox News and a completely incongruent, but equally obligatory swipe at Sean Hannity, Ambinder attempted to establish that he was disappointed because BOR’s questions were not sufficiently tou

Ambinder, looking for knowledge and insight.

[PoloSec]

I didn’t watch the interview because I knew I would be disappointed by BOR.

Sounds like I was right.