Actually, the original article does ask some good questions and makes some good points, e.g.:
“A much better question, one that should have occurred to every Obama-hating producer at Fox News, is this: “Mr. President, can you provide one example of when you held someone specifically accountable for a major screwup? One example? Over five years?” And if Obama prevaricated, then O’Reilly could have asked Obama why he seems to go out of his way not to hold his political appointees publicly accountable for mistakes of omission or commission.
But instead, O’Reilly entered the imaginary world of conspiracies and cover-ups and let the president off easy.”
He’s right.
“But instead, O’Reilly entered the imaginary world of conspiracies and cover-ups and let the president off easy.”
That in itself is a victory for conservatives. Obama’s non-answers and evasions weren’t exactly hard to spot. BO’R didn’t need to be a hard-ass, and it was a better play to be respectful and let Barry be his own worst enema