Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamacare is junk insurance, part ten
Conservative Intel ^ | 12-10-13 | David Freddoso

Posted on 12/10/2013 11:42:12 AM PST by The Old Hoosier

Yesterday’s New York Times piece on Obamacare’s high deductibles hammers home one of the surprising results of Obamacare — that a lot of people aren’t just paying more, but in fact face having less insurance...

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeintel.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: lawlessnation; obama; obamacare; obamalies

1 posted on 12/10/2013 11:42:12 AM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Ha...paying MORE for LESS.... who knew!!?? (sarc)

Did anyone expect that this Ponzi sham, switcheroo would actually hand you a like-for-like change from the one you had to the one you are coerced INTO having? Really!!??

2 posted on 12/10/2013 11:45:59 AM PST by SMARTY ("Through money, democracy becomes its own destroyer, after money has destroyed intellect. " Spengler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

More for less is exactly what it is. What we got here is an elected public servant willfully and knowingly scamming the public which I would think would be MORE than enough reason to remove him from office but sadly we got a one party system in this country. The Democrats and the Democrats II formerly known as the Republican party.


3 posted on 12/10/2013 11:50:07 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (What do we want? Time travel. When do we want it? It's irrelevant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

“America is a two party country, with a ONE party media” W. Churchill


4 posted on 12/10/2013 11:51:27 AM PST by SMARTY ("Through money, democracy becomes its own destroyer, after money has destroyed intellect. " Spengler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Obamacare is technically not insurance. It is primarily income redistribution, not protection against possible losses.


5 posted on 12/10/2013 11:52:01 AM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Winston or Ward?


6 posted on 12/10/2013 12:07:26 PM PST by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Winston, of course. And I am sure he knew more about America than “O” does


7 posted on 12/10/2013 12:14:47 PM PST by SMARTY ("Through money, democracy becomes its own destroyer, after money has destroyed intellect. " Spengler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
When will America's dumbed-down population come to see that the Democrats who forced through this legislation were not then, or now, interested "health care" or helping citizens? "Health care" and "health insurance" constituted the vehicle, or Trojan Horse, which concealed the largest redistribution of earnings in America's history.

Early on, Senator Baucus, himself, even called it "a leveling," which is just another word for redistribution.

Every Democrat who supported, voted for, or defended the lies and concealment of the real purpose of that Christmas Eve action, and all the lies which accompanied it should be held to account for their individual actions which are now destroying lives, families.

Each Democrat who voted for the ACA, defended the lies which allowed it to pass, and, even now, denies its intended purpose, should be confronted by the families of every Stage IV Cancer patient who has received a notice of cancellation of the insurance which was making it possible for them to fight their disease and maintain their optimism and hope. Not one Democrat should be spared that confrontation!

Each Democrat, when warned in 2010 of the millions of citizens that would lose their insurance in late 2013 because of ACA's rules, who denied Republicans' warnings and, en masse,voted against amending ACA in order to prevent what is now happening, must be held publicly accountable for his/her individual actions.

8 posted on 12/10/2013 12:18:32 PM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Obamacare is junk insurance , part ten.

The concept and practice of insurance has existed for over 300 years.
I doubt that one ignorant, arrogant Kenyan can obliterate that all by himself.

Obamacre may be many things, but it never was, isn't now and can never be insurance.

9 posted on 12/10/2013 1:01:32 PM PST by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good grace to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

One man’s “junk insurance” is another man’s life preserver. Obama stole all the life preservers and made a hole in the bottom of the boat.

In WA State, over 90% of the Obamacare sign ups have been put on Medicaid. I looked up the Medicaid requirements in this state and found out that those benefits are asset tested. A Medicaid recipient is allowed to own a home, which is valued less than $500,000, but a lien is put on the house to cover the Medicaid expenses.

So, WA State Medicaid recipients are mortgaging their homes to pay for Obamacare. They are also jeopardizing their credit rating and they don’t even know it because they are automatically signed up for Obamacare when they fill out the application online.


10 posted on 12/10/2013 1:55:56 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson