Posted on 10/15/2013 11:17:20 AM PDT by MichCapCon
Stringent state rules require school districts to lay off employees based on flawed rankings, according to a new study. And the state's report card might be punishing school districts and education employees who are doing a good job.
The Michigan Department of Education is required by state and federal laws to rank schools to try to measure their quality. The MDE developed "Top-to-Bottom" rankings, which are broadly based on student proficiency (50 percent of a school's grade), student growth (25 percent) and achievement gap (25 percent).
But the Mackinac Center for Public Policy and many school officials say the Top-to-Bottom list is flawed.
"You have to take reality into account,” said Audrey Spalding, director of education policy at the Mackinac Center. "It would be wonderful if we lived in a world where every student in Michigan came from a family that was not struggling. But the fact of the matter is we don't. And it is simply folly to pretend that Grosse Pointe students are coming from the same background that, say, Detroit students are coming from."
The study, which was authored by Spalding, says the current "system risks penalizing schools based not on their actual performance, but rather on the portion of low-income students they happen to enroll."
The study quotes two school officials:
In 2011, Brendan Walsh, a Grosse Pointe Public Schools school board member, plotted schools' Top-to-Bottom scores against the percentage of students eligible for a free or reduced-price lunch in each school, and wrote of the Top-to-Bottom ranking, “…[O]ne should not conclude that low scores on standardized tests are a sign of a bad school any more than concluding high scores mean a school is ideal.” David Britten, superintendent of Godfrey-Lee Public Schools, conducted a similar analysis in 2013 and concluded: "Disguised as a ranking system… [the Top-to-Bottom list] really is nothing more than another blinding flash of the obvious. Did we really need another expensive system for identifying which schools and districts have higher rates of poverty than others?" Education experts across the ideological spectrum say that poverty rates have a high correlation with student performance. So schools that serve largely low-income students tend to have test scores much lower than schools that serve a higher-income population.
The study says that 55 percent of a school’s ranking on the latest Top-to-Bottom list can be explained by the percentage of those who qualify for free school lunches. Michigan's list is more correlated to poverty rates than similar rankings in other surveyed states.
The study recommends placing a greater emphasis on student growth and looking to other states for ways to retool the Top-to-Bottom ranking. Thanks to state and federal requirements, low-ranked schools can be forced to fire the school principal, replace the majority of the staff, convert to a charter school or even close the building.
A hypothetical situation helps explain how this could happen to a good school: Say a school serves students who are from families living below the poverty line. Those students score in the lowest 10 percent on state standardized tests at the beginning of the year, but a great school with great teachers raises the scores to 30 percent by the end of the year. Another district serves largely wealthy students who score 75 percent at the beginning of the year, but drops to 60 percent by the end. As it is now, the Top-to-Bottom list could give the latter school a better ranking than the former.
That's a big deal because In the past, the state has forced schools to remove principals who may have been doing a good job. The Mackinac Center rankings have shown that some schools ranked among the worst in the state may actually be among the best.
Other states include academic growth more prominently in their rankings than Michigan. The study recommends that legislators "look at how other states rank schools in an attempt to reduce the likelihood of penalizing schools for simply serving more disadvantaged students."
The first thing a black family in Memphis does when they are succeeding in work and family, is to send their children to private schools.
"Presto!" Good neighbors! Good community. Good choices.
I live in Texas, but I agree with this. My children go to a public school where the students are 70% low income hispanics. We live in a middle class home, but our neighborhood is the only newer neighborhood within the boundaries of this school. Our kids do quite well academically and score really high on the state exams.
It’s not the teachers, it’s the students. Or better said, the families of these students. They just don’t have the educational background to help their children succeed in school.
Also, they may not be able to read and write that well, but every one of them seems to have been born with a soccer ball at their feet.
Our pioneers are stunning examples of "character"...something it seems that is lacking among the majority of welfare recipients. The Walmart fiasco is a good take on "character". They were thieves...all of them.
Oh good God not this hooey again. The schools are awful in most of the state with a few exceptions. And they spend more $$$ per student than ever before. Maybe corruption, fraud, waste,abuse plus a drug and welfare culture are being measured too then. The level of community acceptance of crime and filth probably corresponds directly to ACT scores. And those things are.not caused by poverty but by politicians.
You miss the point -- IMO, the article is correct.
It is, ultimately, the child's responsibility to learn. His parents are, of course, key in that. School rankings are, in most cases, simply a measurement of the poverty in the district and the failure of parents to help and encourage their children to get an education.
Sure, there are some poor parents who insist on a good education for their children and work hard to ensure it, but that's increasingly unusual.
Now, I am no fan of American public education but even in the worst of inner-city, failing schools, you will find some who go on to college and do well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.