Posted on 10/08/2013 10:07:15 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Whats been the biggest challenge in challenging Obamas eligibility in court? Its been finding a judge who isnt afraid to allow the merits of the case against Obama to be argued in court. The Alabama Supreme Court might just be different.
In an earlier case before the Alabama Supremes, Associate Judge, Tom Parker, stated McInnish has attached certain documentation (Joe Arpaios investigation) to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the short form and long form birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.
Here we have a judge who actually recognizes that the fake birth certificates are...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Amen. But it’s still hard to blame the Democrats for the actions of a Republican Governor.
Yes. I remember watching him speak at the March for Justice, Oct. 1998.(15 yrs. ago this Halloween)
Hope he has better success in a private practice than he does against dim politicians.
Funny how every law in Hawaii is only annotated as to indicate the adoption of the last paragraph.
Last change, maybe, but initial adoption, doesn’t seem so. Do you know the bill number and date when it was passed?
Exactly right. Nothing but Kabuki.
About 6 years too late.
I like to call him the most successful President in US history because he’s pretty much accomplished everything he’s set out to do.
1. Destroy the US from within.
2. Help empower and spread radical Islam.
Thanks to RINOs so far he’s had absolutely no problem accomplishing those two things therefore he is the most successful President - for him personally. For us it’s a nightmare. What we have here is an enemy foreign agent as POTUS. Remember what GW Bush said? Terrorists will get us where we LEAST expect it! Who would ever believe that the enemy could assume the nations highest office and what do the RINOs do? Attack Ted Cruz.
No, because the next law I clicked has this: "[L 1949, c 327, §22; RL 1955, §57-21; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; am L 1967, c 30, §2; HRS §338-18; am L 1977, c 118, §1; am L 1991, c 190, §1; am L 1997, c 305, §5; am L 2001, c 246, §2; am L 2012, c 86, §2],
(with "am" being "amended.")
HOW TO RESEARCH CONSTITUTIONAL, LEGISLATIVE, AND STATUTORY HISTORY IN HAWAII
After 5+ years of this I would have thought that the difference between “citizen” and “natural born citizen” would be something we could take for granted as understood ,, at least on this site.
“As soon as I saw that Larry Klaymon is involved, I quit reading.”
There are folks who just fundamentally refuse and won’t. God knows who they are. What we see is like, at best, a time slice of a soul. God sees the whole eternity’s worth of the soul. Anyhow because we can’t see what God can, we can’t conclude any specific person is utterly lost short of his or her death.
Anyhow those folks will ultimately get their wish. They will be rapt in the devil and his incredible hate of God, and get what the devil gets, and not want to leave their environs no matter how horrible it gets.
God says that there are people living who are beyond salvation, who “cannot repent.” Again, I will not claim to know who these people are. But scripture gives us good clues.
They will be instrumental in the Great Tribulation, of their own wills.
The author of chart needs to learn the difference between “fighting a duel” and “dual citizenship.”
If you’re referring to a certain passage in Hebrews, I think that’s a widely misinterpreted passage. It’s saying to backsliding believers that while you’re moving backwards, you cannot also be moving forwards. Its scope is small scale and not permanent, as following the narrative makes clear.
forwards => forward
You might subscribe to the false proverb that you can't judge a book by its cover, but you indeed can in the spiritual realm.
I see people who have spit in God's face by mutilating their bodies beyond remedy, and I have a pretty good idea that they will never repent, nor have that ability.
That is the real birth certificate.
Hawaii’s official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: “Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country” (applies to adopted children).
B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.
C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births under HRS 338-17.8. A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.
Thank you, but I have no experience with law in Hawaii. I will be looking into the law and the official records of the law soon, but today has just kept be busier than a tied up dog. Your info is encouraging.
Well, maybe duel citizenship is about having to fight for both at the age of 18? lol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.