Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Do you trust the Obamacare "navigators" at the IRS to "keep secret" your most personal medical secrets?
1 posted on 10/05/2013 12:52:50 PM PDT by Graewoulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Graewoulf
Obamacare says that the US feral government owns your body, which is why you owe them maintenance fees on your body.

Since we have established that the US feral government owns your body, we have also established that they own all your information, and can do with it as they please.

Any questions?

2 posted on 10/05/2013 12:57:13 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (When your policy is to rob Peter to pay Paul, you can be certain of the enthusiastic support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

Because it was written and is being administered by radical Marxists?


4 posted on 10/05/2013 1:02:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

The Canadians are running the system for 36 states, so our neighbor to the north will know all about your junk and weapons. Yeah hey dere, hoser!


5 posted on 10/05/2013 1:03:27 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

Because ZeroCare has nothing to do with healthcare. It’s a facade. The whole thing is about control., control of a massive government and control over people.


6 posted on 10/05/2013 1:05:33 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrChips; Mr. K; LadyDoc; hocndoc; laplata; seeker41; Iron Munro; Sacajaweau; SoFloFreeper; ...

PING !


7 posted on 10/05/2013 1:06:10 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Marxist Obama'care' Insurance violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

OK. Here’s a question for brighter minds than mine. Roe v. Wade established the “right to privacy.” I personally believe that the right to privacy is inherent in the unenumerated rights referred to in the Ninth Amendment, although I don’t believe it is applicable to the abortion issue, but that’s a subject for another day.

So the question is: If the right to privacy designated in Roe v. Wade is widely accepted (especially by leftists) as the Law of the Land, wouldn’t that mean that the government has no right to our personal healthcare information?

Doesn’t that put Obamacare at odds with Roe v. Wade, and thus render it unconstitutional? Of course I realize that the Supreme Court ruled Obamacare to be constitutionally valid, but that is because the right to privacy was never brought up in the arguments to be considered, nor addressed in the Court’s decision.

If the right to privacy were to be invoked before the Supreme Court, wouldn’t the court have to rule Obamacare unconstitutional on that basis alone? Or else would they rule that the right to privacy only applies to abortion, a ruling which would be absurd on its face.

See Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

Or am I missing something?


9 posted on 10/05/2013 1:13:49 PM PDT by Maceman (Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

ObamaCare is a huge 4th Amendment violation.


11 posted on 10/05/2013 1:36:26 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

Hey, bud, do you think you live in a Republic or something?

As the DC cop so eloquently put it, “This aint Amurica no more.”

We’ve been fundamentally transformed! Get over it like a good little subject.


17 posted on 10/05/2013 7:22:06 PM PDT by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

Because stupid people voted for him. Many of them were women.


18 posted on 10/05/2013 7:24:39 PM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson