Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: reed13k
Could be. But with one freedom loving nation in the center of the country, we could maintain interior lines and be quite strong.

Northeast region, continuing along the Great Lakes as far west as Chicago or Minnesota -- it's pretty solidly blue.
West coast from California up to Seattle -- pretty solidly blue.
From Idaho to Kansas, to Texas, to Florida, to West Virginia and the Carolinas -- one very big area which is pretty Red.

There would be outliers (Virginia, New Mexico, Florida etc.) which might be awkward to absorb, but by holding the interior together, the low population center could maintain strength while making it difficult for the two Liberal areas in the East and in the West to unite and coordinate.

But, yeah, 5-6 nations is conceivable. In my opinion, however, that would be more likely to result in actual fighting, because people start thinking they can "win" and control people who don't want to be controlled.

7 posted on 09/24/2013 9:21:32 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (21st century. I'm not a fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

I can see the cleveland to chicago belt, but get 70 miles out and it changes quick.

Other option I see is a split City/Country along what your hinting at. So Seatle to San Diego but nothing inland, Boston to DC/Baltimore maybe Richmond with a finger to Chicago through central PA - though the PA T may have something to say about it. Then it would end up like 3 with maybe a few short-lived city-states like Miami, St. Louis, NO, and Denver thrown in for measure.


8 posted on 09/24/2013 1:45:24 PM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson