Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Budget Sequester Is a Success
wall street journal ^ | 8/11/13 | Stephen Moore

Posted on 08/12/2013 5:57:01 AM PDT by cotton1706

The biggest underreported story out of Washington this year is that the federal budget is shrinking and much more than anyone in either party expected.

Consider the numbers: According to the Congressional Budget Office, annual outlays peaked at $3.598 trillion in fiscal 2011. After President Obama's first two years in office, many in Washington expected that number to hit $4 trillion by 2014. Instead, spending fell to $3.537 trillion in fiscal 2012, and is on pace to fall below $3.45 trillion by the end of this fiscal year (Sept. 30). The $150 billion budget decline of 4% is the first time federal expenditures have fallen for two consecutive years since the end of the Korean War.

This reversal from the spending binge in 2009 and 2010 began with the debt-ceiling agreement between Mr. Obama and House Speaker John Boehner in 2011. The agreement set $2 trillion in tight caps on spending over a decade and created this year's budget sequester, which will save more than $50 billion in fiscal 2013.

As long as Republicans don't foolishly undo this amazing progress by agreeing to Mr. Obama's demands for a "balanced approach" to the 2014 budget in exchange for calling off the sequester, additional expenditure cuts will continue automatically. Those cuts are built into the current budget law.

In other words, Mr. Obama has inadvertently chained himself to fiscal restraints that could flatten federal spending for the rest of his presidency. If the country sees any normal acceleration of economic growth (from the anemic 1.4% growth rate so far this year), the deficit is on a path to drop steadily at least through 2015. Already the deficit has fallen from its Mount Everest peak of 10.2% of gross domestic product in 2009, to about 4% this year.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: sequester
This article is a bit rosy but if these numbers are actually true, then spending is headed in the right direction.

Let's defund Obamacare and eliminate the deficit entirely!

1 posted on 08/12/2013 5:57:01 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

And bonehead is reported as having been part of this trend.


2 posted on 08/12/2013 6:00:20 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

It’s too bad it’s on the backs of the defense dept. almost exclusively.

Social spending is still out of control.


3 posted on 08/12/2013 6:02:29 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

BWAHAHHAAH OH YEAH WE’RE SAVING MONEY BY THE BARREL-FULL.
YESTERDAY I SEEN A MIDGET TAKE A LEAK INTO A FORREST FIRE..PUT THE DANGED THInG RIGHT OUT! film at 11..


4 posted on 08/12/2013 6:02:40 AM PDT by jimsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The article is way too rosy. Spending was at an artificial high in 2008 through 2012. Its cold comfort that it shrunk from those levels. We are nipping at the edges of a huge problem. We are still headed toward national bankruptcy because Americans fundamentally don’t want the good times to stop. They want to get a government check and pay little or no taxes, or have “the rich” pay for everything. Unless Americans finally sober up and agree to seriously cut entitlements, the only way they will be cut is a crisis like they are having in Greece.


5 posted on 08/12/2013 6:03:39 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard; headstamp 2

I’ll take any budget cuts I can get, but it sure seems like most of the current cuts are in stupid areas. Government does have a role to play — but we cut funding for those necessary activities. Meanwhile, the government charity which teaches huge demographic groups the benefits of being completely unproductive — funding for that is mostly untouched.


6 posted on 08/12/2013 6:07:02 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (21st century. I'm not a fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The author is quite clear that trying to defund Obamacare is counterproductive.


7 posted on 08/12/2013 6:22:23 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

To my mind, something is way, way off here. Some of the increase-limited government agency spending may be down, I’m betting the whipping boy is the DoD, but I’ve seen no information where Herr Obama’s extra entitlement spending he’s instituted to the tune of an extra Trillion Dollars per year (85+ programs, not including SS or Medicare). Nor do I think it accounts for the extra $85 billion per Month the FED is creating electronic scrip for to purchase our own T-Bills and to invest (half) in a stock market that is avidly eager to take in about $40 billion/Month of government money (no wonder the NSYE looks so good).

Revenues may be up because of the extra revenues from taxes resulting from Zero’s new orders and laws, and we may have a smaller deficit (or even surplus). That DOES NOT mean our spending has gone down.

In short, I just don’t believe this. It is sleight of hand book keeping in my opinion.


8 posted on 08/12/2013 6:26:47 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“The author is quite clear that trying to defund Obamacare is counterproductive.”

Yeah, that’s why I don’t exactly buy this article.


9 posted on 08/12/2013 6:30:02 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Some years ago the powers that be made a switch from debt to deficit. So that, “we need to shrink the national debt” has now become, “we need to shrink the deficit” They think we are too stupid to understand the difference.


10 posted on 08/12/2013 6:31:02 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Yes it forced reductions but Obama used it to close “his” White House off from the public due to lack of funds...but then he spends the money to have his fn dog air lifted to Marthas Vinyard for his vacation.


11 posted on 08/12/2013 6:49:56 AM PDT by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Its a start but wake me up when they cut 25%.


12 posted on 08/12/2013 7:08:58 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

let me sleep till 50%.


13 posted on 08/12/2013 7:23:29 AM PDT by cableguymn (The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I’m sure the rats will say it’s due to the tax increases. So once again mixed news with everyone able to claim their policy is what is helping.


14 posted on 08/12/2013 8:04:28 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson