Posted on 08/07/2013 6:29:11 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
The following image is a composite created by scanning the WH LFBC using Xerox WorkCentre 7655 upside down using the automatic feeder. The resulting file was opened in Preview, the image rotated 180 degrees and printed to PDF. The resulting PDF was opened in preview, the layers unlocked and moved to the side. In addition, a close up of the signature was blown up to show how the background layer, not surprisingly, has filled in some of the white that resulted from the separation of the background and foreground layers.
Note how for example the signature block is fully separated.
(Excerpt) Read more at nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
Perhaps you meant aren't forgeries.
Already corrected it FogDUmb. Check #439 above your post.
At least one of Obama’s tax returns was done on a Konica Minolta bizhub 352. It appears to have similar layers as the tax returns done on the Xerox. In the comments of this link.
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/wh-lfbc-timeline/
Nothing about the rest of what I wrote, huh? Just making a stink because I started my response before you corrected yourself?
True to form! “The insults-without-substance style is a dead giveaway.”
“I just don’t want anyone to pull this on Cruz.”
Pull what? Challenge Cruz to have his NBC eligibility tested in federal court up to the Supreme Court? An honorable patriotic candidate and his supporters would welcome that challenge, I would think.
Barry has fought tooth and nail to prevent discovery and production of his original 1961 birth vital record in federal court thus evading any test of his NBC eligibility.
Cruz has, so far, been totally transparent regarding his birth location and the citizenship of his parents.
Cruz has not claimed to be NBC, but has claimed to be a “citizen at birth” because of his mother’s US citizenship (and her age and US residency history when he was born). This would make him a statutory citizen.
My mother was born in Wilmington, Delaware. Shes a U.S. citizen, so Im a U.S. citizen, Cruz said.
Im not going to engage in a legal debate. The facts are clear, he added. I can tell you where I was born and who my parents were. And then as a legal matter, others can worry about that. Im not going to engage.
FReeper’s won’t be “pulling this on Cruz.” It will first be his GOP opponents who will challenge his eligibility to be on the ballot, just as Hillary supporters were the first “birthers” in the 2008 Dem primary.
If Cruz wins the GOP nomination, you can be sure that his eligibility will be challenged by the Dems, just as the entire MSM went after McCain’s Panama birth. They can claim that even though both Barry and Cruz both have foreign dads and US citizen moms, Cruz is distinguishable from Barry because he was not born on US soil (assuming that evidence that Barry was NOT born elsewhere isn’t produced by 2016).
So Dems don’t have to worry about charges of hypocrisy if they go after Cruz after they supported Barry. Well, unless you ignore the CRS and Barry’s legal team citing the Marguet-Pillado case, a 9th Circus case with dicta stating the even a mere “biological connection” to a US citizen was enough to establish NBC status.
Of course, Cruz can ALSO cite US v Marguet-Pillado!
See:
“Obama cites US v Marguet-Pillado. Dicta implies Obama eligible even if born in Kenya”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2857598/posts
The "prima facie" or first look has been shown to be an ass like FogBlowers. And credible probable cause has been shown that Obama has published forged birf certificates.
The courts go 'bock bock bock bock' in the face of the usurper Obama.
Even funny rodeo clowns can't mock the supreme being Obama without getting derision from OBots.
Question to Obots only.
Why are you so quick to dismiss Obama’s own claim of being born in Kenya? I have had actual Obots [on this site, but since banned] explain to me that Obama is a basically honest, straightforward person. One now-banned Obot told me that Obama doesn’t lie at all. He used to harass me for calling Obama a liar. Imagine that.
Anyway, back when Obama was open, honest & straightforward about his Kenyan birth, he had nothing to lose from it. In fact, he didn’t disavow his Kenyan birth claim until it interfered w his presidential aspirations. I.e.: when he had something to lose from the truth, he finally renounced it.
So why do Obots not believe Obama’s initial claim? It only makes sense that that was the time when he told the truth. Why are his own supporters so quick to call him a liar over it?
Just making a stink because I started my response before you corrected yourself?
You're the one stinking up the place.
Nothing about the rest of what I wrote, huh?
Oh, I wrote more about it up the thread. LoL.
“I understand that NBC will be a guest on Reality Checks radio show this evening. Call-in questions will be taken. Should be interesting.”
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rcr/2013/08/14/rc-radio
I may listen in. NBC’s current update of her claimed progress in replicating the “workflow” that resulted in the WH LFBC pdf is at the link below. She states that she hasn’t yet explained the halos and her “workflow” does not explain the “smiley face” or “the distorted character in the signature stamp” or address the possibility that the presumed source hardcopy was forged.
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/xerox-workflow/the-xerox-workcentre-workflow-successes/
begin NBC blog quote
Still not well enough explained to my satisfaction
1.Halos (in progress) Category
Not Addressed by Workflow
1.Claims of forgery of the original documents the Department of Health sent to the White House, or the document on file with the DOH of HI.
2.Irregularities in type face (Link1, Link2 and Link3)
3.African race ( Link1 , Link2 ,Category )
4.The distorted character in the signature stamp
5.Smiley Face
end NBC blog quote
ABBYY uses MRC for their multifunction printers.
http://www.abbyy.com/ocr_sdk_embedded/for_MFP_vendors/
And the ABBYY software incorporates MRC for PDFs.
They say this.
“The MRC technology analyzes the outlines of similar characters in the document, creates an average character template and uses it instead of a character itself. This leads to better readability, because some of the text defects are corrected, and the character outlines become more precise.”
http://www.abbyy.com/ocr_sdk_embedded/pdf_mrc/
Sounds like it creates pixel for pixel identical characters.
“The MRC technology analyzes the outlines of similar characters in the document, creates an average character template and uses it instead of a character itself.”
This makes it sound like MRC is OCR, but it is not OCR character identification. Instead of ‘character” I prefer shape detection and replication or butterdezillion’s “blob” detection and replication...
Any imaginable form, shape, image, blob (or character or number) can be detected and cataloged as a scan progresses and then when a “close enough” similar shape is encountered, the first one is used instead at that bitmap location in the scan. This reduces (compresses) the size of the scanned document pdf file.
As a non-birther, I always thought this was one of the stupider assertions by the birthers, and can't see why anyone with a whit of intelligence would repeat it.
Fantasywriter, where were you born? How do you know? Do you remember?
I'll bet anything you only know your birth location because your parents told you. Could they have lied to you? Who knows?
Basically, where a person thinks they are born means diddly-squat. They are not a witness. They only know what they have been told. That's why we rely on state records. The certificate of live birth from the State of Hawaii is prima facie evidence. Whatever Obama believes - whether Hawaii (which he has claimed), or Kenya (which he has not) - is totally irrelevant.
So you are too ignorant to know that Obama indeed claimed a Kenyan birth?
I'm shocked that you of all people would even question the sterling credentials of Chief Mark Kessler. I would list all of his best qualities if I could, but until a few hours ago, I had never heard of him.
I simply asked, "What caused Chief Mark Kessler to say the following about Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo:
'Mike Zullo, ladies and gentlemen, he couldn't, he could not investigate a flat tire. He is a fraud, 110% fraud. The question I pose today is what has Mike Zullo done besides flap his gums? He has done nothing, absolutely nothing but run his mouth.'"
I'll bet you know what caused him to say that. Why did he say that?
Since you evidently didn’t read my post the first time, here it is again:
You make idiotic points, you get called on them, & then you ignore your own stupid points in order to move onto another stupid point. Who died & made Kessler the worlds foremost authority? List all the reasons why his word & judgment are inviolate. This time, lets have a complete list. Dont just run off & make another inane point. Actually lay out the case that Kessler is the wisest, most reliable investigative source in America, or very close to it. It shouldnt take long, since you cite him as the authoritative. Go into detail about why hes to be considered the last word on anything. It should be very interesting.
You just leave Senator Cruz alone!! Your job is to investigate Obama!! When you're all done with Obama and you know who his parents were and where he was born, then you can start a new investigation on someone else.
But, not Ted Cruz!!
[P.S. The Supreme Court doesn't have the power to disqualify presidential candidates.]
Ted Cruz - 2016
It might help if you could remind me once in a while, ok? Thanks. ;-)
I know where I was born without any parent telling me. I would go beyond some silly picture on the Internet because I would submit those documents that have genuine ink signatures on genuine and authentic documents to a court of law or submit them to get a drivers license or any other controlling authority. No qualms about it like any other citizen. Obama, who should be held to a high standard, is absurd beyond belief and he gets away with it. Obama doesn't submit anything because he's lying and his birf certs would be subjected to verification.
I even have proof who was the attending doctor, a WW2 vet, bless his soul.
But we got statements like this from Obama even as late as Sept. 2006:
Obama said he had a childhood in Kenya? Ha.
Focus!
It doesn’t matter AT ALL where Obama claims he was born. He was not a witness to his birth. For all I care, for all any court would care, Obama could claim he was born in Bethlehem. It wouldn’t matter. He wasn’t a witness!!!
The ONLY thing that matters is the official record, and the official record declares Hawaii to be his birth place.
Well that’s a nice sleight of hand. First you say Obama never claimed to have been born in Kenya, & now you say it doesn’t matter if he did or if he didn’t.
Let’s take your advice and focus, shall we? First things first. Did or did not Obama claim a Kenyan birth?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.