Posted on 07/30/2013 9:03:55 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
So where is it?
SAD was never seen in Hawaii until 1963. She was never seen by anyone while she was pregnant.That's the stark reality which persists despite all the efforts at creating the legend over the years:
Cora Weiss and Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers and David Maraniss, diligent coaching of "witnesses" and expungement of documents.
The 44th president is not the son of either the Kenyan nor of the caretaker.
Lew Alcindor?
You got that right...David Maraniss quotes Philip Lipson, side-kick of Charlette Le Fevre from the Seattle Museum of the Mysteries, who identified Anna Obama as Stanley Ann Dunham.
Just like they identify para-normal phenomena, like UFO’s and bigfoot, and arrange gay pride and fairy-festivals.
http://www.seattlechatclub.org/
http://www.seattlechatclub.org/News.html
The Auntie Thread is even longer. I can't find it right now, but I'm positive I've seen reference to an item called simply, The Long Thread that I believe goes on for over 10,000 posts.
Thanks for the Ping, Seize.
Is this really it? (re: possible Obama’s Kenyan B.C. - Attny Taitz) Click on the link
orlytaitzesq.com ^ | 8/2/2009 | rxsid
Posted on Sunday, 2 August 2009 6:35:53 PM by rxsid
11,759 comments
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?page=1
Blogger admits Hawaii birth certificate forgery, subverting Obama claims (Uh-oh)
Israel Insider ^ | 3 July 2008 | Reuven Koret
9,470 comments
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2040486/posts
Well gp find it.
gp = go Heh.
Doesn't change the fact that he told some of his classmates he was an Indonesian Prince, and told others he was born in Kenya:
She grew up and attended Punahou School with "Barry" Obama. She recalls how as a young child, Obama alternatively told classmates he was an Indonesian prince or Kenyan royalty. Caldwell also recounts how a young Obama reacted to a disturbing racial comment from a tennis pro. This is the edited transcript of an interview conducted on June 27, 2012.
I’m not looking for something that doesn’t exist. You made the claim, back it up.
Testing of the actual reels should be done, because the stories regarding the images we’ve seen online are documentably false, with documents claimed to be from places they could not have been from.
What happens if the claims in a government record cannot be corroborated by the legally-required paper trail? For instance, Alex Galovich at the Passport Office submitted in Chris Strunk’s FOIA lawsuit an early-80’s DOS “cable” claiming that millions of passport applications had been destroyed, but the retention schedule had never been changed, the IG had given a report recommending changes based on the fact that the retention schedules were not GOING to change, records of the destruction were not made, DOS has been charging people to do searches of these records that were supposedly destroyed, and records supposedly destroyed have been easily found. THat being the case, would you find that “cable” to be credible/genuine? How would we know whether it was or wasn’t? We already know that Obama’s passport file was breached 3 times, and sources close to the investigation say it was to sanitize the record. We also know that Obama’s selective service registration was forged, presumably by somebody in that government office. The evidence strongly suggests that the HDOH created a fabricated BC for Obama. Given all that, how can we have any confidence that any government record hasn’t also been tampered with? Right now the US government is one of the least credible sources of information because of the records tampering we already know about, which the system covered for Obama.
Clark Kent
So, after all of the extensive investigations, when it comes to each of the three facts needed to determine Obama's status as a natural born citizen (the identity of Obama's father, the identity of Obama's mother, the location of Obama's birth), the investigators still have "no idea" what any of these facts may be. Obviously, then, the investigators still have "no idea" whether Obama is or is not eligible.
That's okay. In fact, I've said from the beginning of all this that I have "no idea" how we can prove with certainly the eligibility of any of our past presidents if that requires that we prove with certainty the identity of the mother, the identity of the father (which is especially difficult) and the location of birth. We really know nothing more about these facts than what we have read in books that were written by people we never knew. I really don't know how I would go about proving with certainty where I was born or the identity of both of my parents. I have just been accepting on faith the truth of what I've been told and what appears to have been written in some paperwork. All I really know is that I shouldn't let myself be crippled by these uncertainties because the rest of the world is going to keep moving forward with or without me. Life does not brake for uncertainty.
Keep investigating Obama's eligibility. Please don't begin a new investigation into Ted Cruz's eligibility until you've finished with the investigation of Obama's eligibility. First things first.
Thanks.
Once again, the close resemblance between Barry and Stanly Dunham suggests there is very likely some sort of genealogical connection between them.
Astonishing claims require astonishing evidence. In the absence of such, they are merely wild speculation.
What I’ve mostly been investigating is the CRIMES committed to cover up for the fact that Obama has no prima facia birth record originating in the United States. Crimes committed by our own government and covered up by a threatened media. What we’re talking about here is the death of everything America is about. The scandals that have been recently revealed are the tip of the iceberg, and with that tip sticking out it’s about time people took the criminality within our system seriously. That criminal, unaccountable, lawless system is the greatest threat this nation faces, and to be perfectly honest I don’t know if we can survive this threat.
No, I said Mike Evans made the claim.
There was no search warrant. Hawaii law would not allow it.
Here is the Hawaii Statutes on search warranties:
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/histatutes/5/38/803/III
“A search warrant is an order in writing made by a judge or other magistrate, directed to an officer of justice, commanding the officer to search for certain articles supposed to be in the possession of or which are anticipated to be in the possession of one who is charged with having obtained them illegally, or who keeps them illegally, or with the intent of using them as the means of committing a certain offense.” Haw. Rev. Stat. § 803-31
Hospital health records would not apply.
America has survived, grown and flourished for hundreds of years despite many, many crimes by many, many public officials at the national, state and local levels of government. We detected no more than a very tiny fraction of those crimes and we didn't prosecute most of the crimes we detected.
And, yet, America has always just kept rolling forward. I'm confident that America will be around long after I'm gone, long after Obama is gone and long after the current crop of bureaucrats in Hawaii have said their last alohas.
Furthermore, I said "whatever means AberCrombie used" he went looking and found bupkis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.