Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: The Eagle has Landed
Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog ^ | Sunday, July 21, 2013 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 07/21/2013 4:25:30 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell

Sunday, July 21, 2013

The Eagle has Landed

Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog
Forty-four years ago, a nation that we now know was racist, didn't care about the environment and drank too much soda, landed on the moon.

Half-a-billion television viewers watched it happen live. They saw men walk on the surface of another world. They saw that human beings could break free of their world and take a first step into the rest of the universe.

And that was that.

Neil Armstrong died about the time that Obama finished gutting NASA. He lived long enough to write a saddened letter about the decline of American space exploration under Obama that everyone in the media did their best not to pay attention to. The letter was also signed by Eugene Cernan, the last man to walk on the moon.

Cernan is 79.  Of the dozen men who walked on the moon, only four are dead, a testament to their quality of their vigor.

No one who was born after 1935 has walked on the moon. That period is swiftly becoming a historical relic. A thing that men did who lived long ago. A great work of other times like the building of dams and fleets, the winning of wars and the expansion of frontiers.

Those are things that the men of back then did. Those are not things that we do anymore.

The youngest man to have walked on the moon, Harrison Schmitt, is 78. He was only 37 when he walked on the moon. Soon he will be one with the last of the Civil War soldiers and the last of the WW1 soldiers and then the last of the WW2 soldiers.

We like to believe that walking on the moon is still something we could do if we really wanted to. But like building all the big things, we just choose not to do it. We have more important things to worry about like social justice and figuring out the implications of the latest 1,000 page bill.

Forget exploring space. We explore the breadth of our own bureaucracy. We are the Schliemanns of Trojan horse government. We are the Neil Armstrongs of government landing on the paper moons of bills and acts by whose pale light we lead our pallid lives.

In those long lost days, we did great things. The bureaucrats took their cut and the contractors chiseled and the lobbyists lobbied and the whole great vulture pack of government swarmed and screeched and still somehow, with a billion monkeys on our back, we moved forward, because we still had great goals. Now our goal is government. There is no longer a moon. Only a paper moon.

The whole mess of bureaucrats, contractors, lobbyists, policy experts, consultants, congressmen, aides, crooks, creeps, thieves and agents is no longer a necessary evil that we put up with in order to accomplish great things. It is the great thing that we accomplish. There are no more moon landings, no more dams or tallest buildings in the world. The massive towering edifice of our own government is now our moon landing, our Hoover Dam, our Empire State Building.

Like so many decrepit civilizations before us, the massive rotting edifice of our government has become our great work. Keeping it going, keeping it from falling apart, wiping its bottom, finding the money to prevent its latest imminent failure, fighting over the last folder while the barbarians shout "Allah Akbar" and put all the paper to the torch because the Koran makes it redundant, that is what we do now.

We no more go a-roving so late into the night. Not when our own night has come. And it is late indeed.

It is not that we have no more Neil Armstrongs or Eugene Cernans or any of the other clean cut men who look back at us from those old photographs, cool and confident, knowing that they are the messengers that a civilization at its golden apex has picked to represent it at its peak moment. It is that we no longer want them.

The nostalgia is there, but it's every bit as transparent as a Mad Men costume party. It's all very well to ape the clothes and the styles, the fonts and the rest of the window dressing, but it's the core spirit that we have no use for.

Apollo 11 is nice and well, but we have other priorities now. We don't focus on actual achievements, but on social remedies, never realizing that our social remedies were achieved as spinoffs of achievements and that social problems can only be solved as part of the upward ascent of a civilization. There's no percentage in thinking that way. Not when there are a lot more jobs for servicing social dysfunction than there are going into space.

The core element of the space program was competence. It's the same competence that allows us to still land jet planes every day, even if the rate of improvement in the technology slowed down long ago, or perform open heart surgery. But the number of professions in which competent counts has been decreasing over the years. And so has competence as a quality.

We have replaced confidence with attitude. And the difference between them is the same as the difference between a civilization and the savages outside. Confidence comes from competence. Attitude comes from rituals of pride uninformed by achievements.

Attitude is what actors, musicians and the endless swathe of reality television cretins project. And as a society, we value attitude more than competence because not everyone can have competence, but everyone can have attitude. Not everyone can walk on the moon, but everyone can work for the government.

We could go to the moon again, but why bother, as NASA's chief, whose mission, as handed down to him by Barack Obama, was not space exploration, but the enhancement of Muslim self-esteem, told critics. And he's right. Why bother? Back then, in those ancient days when men who are now in their eighties flew, we went to the moon as part of a larger plan and statement about our place in the universe.

We were going to go the moon and then to the planets beyond. We could find new frontiers, plant our flags, build colonies, jump from world to world, star to star, and turn our civilization into something more than another archeological dig. Maybe it was all just a crazy dream, but looking at the eyes of the men who did it and who died and die seeing it undone, there is that sense that they believed that it could be done.

Going to the moon was a crazy idea of course. Going beyond it would have been even crazier. Instead we settled down to the important things, like race relations, the importance of listening to music, breaking up the family, importing huge numbers of people with little use for our way of life and all the other stupid suicidal things that dying civilizations do to pass the time.

The eagle landed in a mud puddle in D.C. The last men who walked on the moon will probably be dead within a decade.

We'll tell our kids about it and they'll shake their heads because what's the big deal anyway? Everyone flies around in spaceships in all the movies. Why bother doing it in real life? They don't bother doing anything in real life. And then they'll go off to another class that will teach them how much carbon waste the space program added and how many super-hurricanes it caused and how much better off we are now that we no longer have cars, plastic bags or air conditioning.

We could have gone to the stars, but we took another road instead. Maybe we can still turn back to a time when we could do great things before it's too late.


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: greenfield; sultanknish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Louis Foxwell

Alas — mark well what I do say — I was reminded of how many, many years it’s been since I studied Byron, as it was “The Maid of Amsterdam” sea shanty and not Lord Byron that came to mind when I read the line.


41 posted on 07/21/2013 8:20:09 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

I think you will appreciate this essay.


42 posted on 07/21/2013 8:20:48 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

Now we make movies about the hero destroying things like that.


43 posted on 07/21/2013 8:24:37 AM PDT by jmcenanly ("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

The Norwegian State, if I’m not mistaken, has him on its blacklist of dangerous racists. Along with Spencer and Horowitz.


44 posted on 07/21/2013 9:22:02 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of Muslim Brotherhood))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade; arasina; daisy mae for the usa; AdvisorB; wizardoz; free-in-nyc; Vendome; ...

We could have gone to the stars, but we took another road instead. Maybe we can still turn back to a time when we could do great things before it’s too late.
...........
This is poetic stuff. The two great promises of the 1950-1960’s were space exploration just over the horizon and unlimited nearly free atomic energy.

After the moon landing, the space program let off with manned exploration. Fusion research never broke through and kept being put off to 30 years in the future. Even today fusion energy is something that’s 30 years off.

BUT BUT

There was an enormous breakthrough with thorium reactors that was shelved. Two working thorium reactors were in operation from 1966-1971. Thorium reactors would have cut the cost of electricity to 1/4 to 1/10 the cost of current lowest cost coal power. They are not only cheap but their dangers are a tiny fraction of light water reactors. They are portable to boot.

Thorium reactors were abandoned because they were not dual use and because the installed light water industry worked against thorium reactors. Amazingly the man who developed thorium reactors—alvin weinberg head of the oakridge labratories—also held the patents on light water reactors. Light water reactors were the reactors in use at the time and to this very day.

Weinberg went to his grave saying that the USA had made a terrible mistake by not going with thorium reactors.

Today the biggest developer of the thorium reactors are the Chinese. They actually read the online US stuff and believed the thorium advocates of lftr. So the chinese set up their own program. The US department of energy is still piddling around with light water reactors. The USA has two companies Transatomic Power and Flibe that are currently looking for money for thorium reactors.

In addition there is some interesting new basic research in dense plasma focus a version of fusion research.
..................

Now having said all that —the problems that are involved with a successful human space exploration are not trivial. imho that has been the primary reason that so much of the exploration of the solar system and beyond has been done by unmanned satellites and telescopes. In fact, likely the only thing this age will be remembered for is the discovery of exoplanets. The discovery that planets on other stars are utterly ubiquitous. (That therefor there are likely habitable planets circulating around other stars.) the rest will be totally forgotten. (Habitable planets have not yet been discovered but likely that will happen in the next ten years.)

I think that the more people will get into space in the next decades as private industry gets involve in space—especially the all too expensive booster phase into space and near earth orbit. NASA is currently funding three companies involved in booster phase.

As well, thorium power (thorium—of which the moon has plenty—as well as h3) and 3d printing will make longer term space exploration possible.

Most important is the constant acceleration of the power of computers. This acceleration of the power of computers is collapsing time frames in which events happen — including the exploration of space.

None of these technological developments come from the government. While the rot of government is apparent to everyone, the vitality of the civilian economy is also apparent to everyone.

However, while there is plenty of waste fraud and abuse in the federal government—including federal scientific research—federal money has also played an important role in the development of basic science and applied science.

The great sadness that the article points to is not that scientific and technological development has slowed down-—(indeed scientific and technological development—has been accelerating)—but rather that federal institutions like NASA are no longer conduits for the genius of the American civilization.


45 posted on 07/21/2013 10:53:29 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

“Except, of course, the little green guys who were there to greet us.”

Those little green guys WERE us and they came from the future to show us in 1969 what we became 100,000 years later.


46 posted on 07/21/2013 10:57:52 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

“they came from the future to show us in 1969 what we became 100,000 years later.”...

But that was then and this is now.


47 posted on 07/21/2013 11:00:37 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Space exploration is going to be taken away from Americans and given to A: muslims, and B: communist/democrat oligarchs.


48 posted on 07/21/2013 11:33:59 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of Muslim Brotherhood))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade

Space exploration is going to be taken away from Americans and given to A: muslims, and B: communist/democrat oligarchs.

...........
no chance the muslims will do this.

the oil gas industry is going to recapitalize the USA by making the USA energy independent and returning the USA energy picture to the pre 1970 days.


49 posted on 07/21/2013 11:59:25 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

When the muslims own the US. The muslioms are owners and slavemasters, not doers.


50 posted on 07/21/2013 12:08:21 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of Muslim Brotherhood))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Confidence comes from competence. Attitude comes from rituals of pride uninformed by achievements.

Competence yields self-respect.

Attitude yields self-esteem.

51 posted on 07/21/2013 12:14:57 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

Aack! I meant to say “sea chantey”. I suppose I could listen to the sea chanteys in a sea shanty.


52 posted on 07/21/2013 12:31:05 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade

Wow! That’s pretty scary.


53 posted on 07/21/2013 12:32:01 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade

When the muslims own the US. The muslioms are owners and slavemasters, not doers.
.........
what’s happening now in the USA oil patch is making rapidly making this possibility very improbable. Technology is changing future history rapidly again as it did during the 1970’s


54 posted on 07/21/2013 12:36:37 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

While I do not dispute most of what you say — I would be way out of my sphere of knowledge, anyway — I must disagree on what you identify as the great sadness in the essay.

IMO, the great sadness here is contained in this paragraph:

Apollo 11 is nice and well, but we have other priorities now. We don’t focus on actual achievements, but on social remedies, never realizing that our social remedies were achieved as spinoffs of achievements and that social problems can only be solved as part of the upward ascent of a civilization. There’s no percentage in thinking that way. Not when there are a lot more jobs for servicing social dysfunction than there are going into space.

^^
And his comments about society’s regard for competence being replaced with admiration for “attitude” are sadly true.


55 posted on 07/21/2013 12:39:14 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

yeah I agree with all that.

What greenfield doesn’t get and probably never will get is that the way to reverse that is to bring God and prayer and bible study back into education.

The bible is the foundation of our civilization.

Knock that out and all the do good stuff just becomes jibberish and counter productive.


56 posted on 07/21/2013 1:14:17 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Well, what you may see - are seeing already - is Obama transferring the deed to the muslims. And when the US is “muslim lands”, there’s no way out except through seas of blood.


57 posted on 07/21/2013 2:03:06 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of Muslim Brotherhood))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Most important is the constant acceleration of the power of computers. This acceleration of the power of computers is collapsing time frames in which events happen — including the exploration of space.

If thorium reactors are best they'll be swept up in the exploding knowledge acceleration ... Sad about NASA but they're PC yesterday and filled with government stupidity... Science is on the brink of tomorrow - machines inventing machines...

58 posted on 07/21/2013 2:03:06 PM PDT by GOPJ (Department of Justice to Americans:'How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

I agree with your remedy completely.

Can’t speak for Greenfield one way or the other.


59 posted on 07/21/2013 2:33:38 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Leonard Cohen put this Lord Byron poem to music - it’s on his “Dear Heather’ album...


60 posted on 07/21/2013 2:33:58 PM PDT by GOPJ (Department of Justice to Americans:'How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson