Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World Tribune: Report Detailing Obama ID Fraud Evidence Will Soon Be Presented To Congress
BirtherReport.com/WorldTribune.com ^ | July 9, 2013 | Dr. Grace Vuoto

Posted on 07/09/2013 7:26:23 AM PDT by Seizethecarp

There is a problem with President Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate: It’s a forgery, say multiple forensic experts who have examined it. A report detailing the evidence will soon be presented to Congress.

On April 27, 2011 the White House released Mr. Obama’s long-form birth certificate in an attempt to quell a public firestorm over the validity of the shorter version he provided prior to his 2008 election. A group of concerned citizens in Arizona suspected the Certificate of Live Birth produced in 2011 by the administration was fabricated; they asked Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County to investigate.

“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,” said Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Lt. Mike Zullo in an exclusive interview with WorldTribune.

This is a key development, asserts Lt. Zullo, because Mr. Hayes is a certified handwriting analyst and forensic document examiner who worked repeatedly for Perkins Coie, a reputable law firm, and was deemed a dependable professional in their legal cases. Moreover, Perkins Coie has defended Mr. Obama in his legal jousts on the birth certificate matter over the past five years.

The report by Mr. Hayes is now an affidavit that belongs to the Cold Case Posse and cannot be retracted, regardless of any political or social pressure he encounters, explains Lt. Zullo.

“There has been a very effective media campaign to discredit anyone who tries to work with us,” said Lt. Zullo. “It is impossible to discuss this issue without being lambasted.”

As a precaution against others misusing or manipulating Mr. Hayes’s report, Lt. Zullo has copyrighted it.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: abdication; awjeez; birtherbs; birthers; conspiracy; joearpaio; mikezullo; misprisionoffelony; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamaid; perjury; treason; zullosusedcars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last
To: Nero Germanicus

Holy crap, why do you keep posting irrelevant citations?? Being ineligible for office has nothing to do with an indictment or criminal prosecution. There’s no penalty for being ineligible. Now if were talking about fraud, that’s a different matter.


121 posted on 07/12/2013 11:29:16 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: edge919

I think you should tell that to the folks who clamoring for criminal indictments of Obama for perjury, forgery, identity theft, document alteration, and not registering the draft, in addition to three different types of fraud. I guess you never heard of the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse’ and their attempts to get the Maricopa County Attorney to pursue a criminal grand jury investigation as a vehicle to forcing Obama out of office, either by resignation or by impeachment for high CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS.
You might want to catch up on the latest developments in the “Obama is ineligible” movement before you post nonsense and end up looking so uninformed.


122 posted on 07/13/2013 12:48:19 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

What part of fraud is a different matter did you not comprehend in my previous post? We were talking about whether courts can remove ineligible persons from office. There is a precedent for this. It wouldn’t involve impeachment unless it is becomes clearer that fraud was committed, and even then, there’s a question of process since Obama was never Constitutionally legitimate.


123 posted on 07/15/2013 9:17:45 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: edge919; Nero Germanicus

An ineligible person is not President and can not be impeached.

Article II does not distinguish between ineligibility prior to an election or after, a person failing to meet the requirements is at all times legally disqualified.

Nothing can be added to the text, it must be taken as it is. If the Framers intended an exception they would have written one.

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States. U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl 5.

Article II commands that an ineligible person shall not be President. A person who is not President can not be impeached.


124 posted on 07/15/2013 10:45:49 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson