Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Are NC Sheriffs Working to Stop Pro-Gun Bill?
armedlutheran.us ^ | 27 June, 2013 | NA

Posted on 06/28/2013 6:32:50 AM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
This seems a pretty good explanation of what is happening with HB937 in North Carolina.
1 posted on 06/28/2013 6:32:50 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Afraid of an armed populace, especially one where the Sheriffs do not control who gets a gun. If the sheriffs get to approve permits, their friends get the permits, the “undesirables” do not. It’s all about power.


2 posted on 06/28/2013 6:37:01 AM PDT by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The “Permit Loophole” Politicians love to complain about loopholes. Think “gun show loophole,” for example. Well, the permit system has a real and very dangerous loophole. Permits are valid for years, so a prospective buyer may pass the background check initially, but when the permit is presented at time of sale, no subsequent check is required to be performed to see if anything has changed. If, in the time between purchasing the permit and presenting it at the store, the buyer had become ineligible to buy the firearm there is no way to tell that from the permit. A sale would be completed, based on outdated information.

I've had CCW (or Firearms Licenses) from Georgia for 15 years. The permit negating a NICS check is in force here and you can buy a gun with it and not have to undergo the check. You still have to fill out the Form 4473.

That said, there was one year here in Georgia a few years ago that this ATF privilege (ha) was revoked because Georgia did not recheck the eligibility of its CCW holders often enough during the 5 year period. Georgia revamped their periodic checks and the WAIVER it applied for to the ATF was reinstated.

3 posted on 06/28/2013 6:40:50 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

...yep, LEOs of all stripes tend towards less guns in the hands of the populace kind of naturally. Plus, with these official organizations, the leadership and administrators of groups tend to be more liberal and bureaucratic by nature than the actual rank and file.


4 posted on 06/28/2013 6:41:31 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

In Georgia, the Sheriffs office approves permits with the sole requirement being a clear NICS check.


5 posted on 06/28/2013 6:41:51 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Correction! The Probate Court approves and issues the permit based on a clear NICS report from the local constabulary....


6 posted on 06/28/2013 6:43:42 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“It’s not about losing revenue. Permits cost a measly five bucks.”

If I remember correctly, one permit gets you one handgun. 10 handguns= $50, and if 100 citizens bought one each= $500 that day. My opinion is that the $$ is an important consideration over the course of a year, especially for smaller Sheriff’s departments where a few hundred dollars is more significant. Most of the 100 Sheriff’s departments in NC would probably be smaller ones, and therefore, most of the Sheriff’s departments are against it.


7 posted on 06/28/2013 6:49:29 AM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

“LEOs of all stripes tend towards less guns in the hands of the populace kind of naturally”

That is not true. Do you have any supporting data? The heads of agencies very rarely speak for their rank and file. Most agency heads are politicians and were not even street police officers for very long if at all. I cannot speak for LEO outside of my geographic area but down here they are overwhelmingly pro 2nd.


8 posted on 06/28/2013 6:53:08 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

I think this damned article makes my point smartass.....


9 posted on 06/28/2013 6:54:03 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Don’t know that I was being a smart-ass. The quote is still incorrect.


10 posted on 06/28/2013 6:59:42 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

my evidence, like yours, is anecdotal, and yet, you snpe about “supporting data.” And again, my supporting data starts with the very article that launched this thread.


11 posted on 06/28/2013 7:06:50 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

quick Google search police unions and gun control. 80 million hits, MOST about how cops work against gun rights.

Do you need more?


12 posted on 06/28/2013 7:08:11 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher
My opinion is that the $$ is an important consideration over the course of a year, especially for smaller Sheriff’s departments where a few hundred dollars is more significant.

I think you are 100 percent correct. When you are scratching your head and saying WTH, follow the money and you will usually find the answer!
13 posted on 06/28/2013 7:13:42 AM PDT by TexanByBirth (Free Republic: where they may agree with the message, but they love to shoot the messenger!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

My data was the 1500 guys I worked with for over 15 years. I cannot speak for NC or other states but I can for certain agencies where I live.


14 posted on 06/28/2013 7:27:15 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
So, to take this from the other side, by abandoning the existing system, it makes it much easier for someone to take away my rights to purchase a firearm by entering some bogus information in the national database. And rather than simply appealing to the local sheriff, the buyer would have to somehow appeal a national database with no real existing appeals process short of filing a federal lawsuit.

And on the other side is a defacto gun registry. Strikes me that both sides are wrong in this, but given the choice, I'd rather stick with the existing system, and do not fault the local sheriffs from wanting to continue it.

15 posted on 06/28/2013 7:32:31 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The pistol purchase permit system is a hold-over from the Jim Crow era.

Apparently, this is the reason for the system in Michigan, also.

16 posted on 06/28/2013 7:46:13 AM PDT by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

When I read the title “Why Are NC Sheriffs Working to Stop Pro-Gun Bill?”, my instant answer to the question was “because they are jack booted fascist thugs” then I read their reasoning and realized that they are jack booted fascist thugs.

“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” ~ Thomas Jefferson


17 posted on 06/28/2013 7:49:31 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Union officials and appointed police officials aren’t really cops.


18 posted on 06/28/2013 7:50:07 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Unfortunately, the North Carolina Sheriffs Association (NCSA) opposes the bill because of a single provision: the repeal of our pistol purchase permit system.

Entrusting our rights to law enforcement officers is an inherently bad idea. Take it from there.

19 posted on 06/28/2013 7:52:20 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

but they are elected by “really” cops in many cases, and they do often reflect the views of their members - all of which misses one of my points - that police organizations often are anti gun right officially....their rank and file notwithstanding.


20 posted on 06/28/2013 8:07:08 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson