Palin/Ghomert: 2016
That's a winning combination to restore traditional American values: Two unabashed Christian Conservatives supporting God, guns, life and liberty.
Posted on 06/23/2013 12:04:00 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Sarah Palin @SarahPalinUSA:
Politicians wonder why we can't trust them? Campaign flip-flops like this and carve-out bribes in the Amnesty... http://fb.me/2IsL1uspC
Palin’s tweet links to a story from TownHall.com detailing Sen. Marco Rubio’s (D-Fla.) flip-flop over amnesty for illegal immigrants.
During a debate with opponents Rep. Kendrick Meek and Gov. Charlie Crist, candidate Rubio argued that giving illegal immigrants an “earned path to citizenship,” which Crist, Sen. John McCain and former President George W. Bush had advocated, is basically amnesty.
Rubio, who won that 2010 election, is now the leading Republican in the U.S. Congress pushing for illegal aliens to be given the earned path to citizenship that he himself insisted was “code for amnesty” only three years ago
(Excerpt) Read more at twitchy.com ...
Read post 79.
Sarah Palin BUMP!! She tells it like it is.
eye roll
“I realize I am taking a nuanced position beyond the grasp of many on this forum”............Real nice way of you to speak to and of your fellow FReepers. Who the hell do you think you are you stuck up condescending PK? Aren’t you the special little snob. Take your arrogant 2 week wonder noobie troll attack other FReepers crap back to the DUmp. I’m sure your pals wait your return there. When you do report back there, make sure you let ‘em know we FReepers can’t ‘grasp’ worth a damn.
Reading and then posting requires a skill set. Posting without reading requires no skill set.
Anyone who reads before they post, can discern that I am firmly on the side of Sarah Palin and all that she espouses and I am firmly against Fox News and the GOPe for the way that both elites have done her dirty.
You sure paint some pretty pictures.
You went out of your way to declare her as fired while posting to Eva, and you described why she was fired and said that you didn't think it was for the single act of insubordination, but because of her not taking her talking points from Karl Rove, although she wasn't fired and you don't actually know why she left Fox news at all.
You then insulted freerepublic and freepers.
Great start, and that leaves out that you have a man "pleasuring" another.
Fwiw, your idea of nuanced thinking seems to be guessing what happened (pretending you "know" works too), then claiming your (really pretty bad) guess is some kind of fact.
You might want to rethink the idee of your superiority before your next post...........
Palin didn’t get fired, and you don’t have the details about her leaving although you are posting your claimed ones.Oh my, aren't you full of your self!I realize that I am taking a nuanced position beyond the grasp of many on this forum.
Why even post here if the intelligence of the posters here doesn't meet your high Mensa type standards?
Sarah could be a powerful media draw...
When she wasn't renewed on Fox, she appeared on Good Morning America opposite a relaunch on the Today Show. She caused GMA to murder The Today Show in the ratings. That is called a nuance
Thanks again for informing us what a nuance is! Thank goodness you are here to edumacate us political and current event dummies. I'll bet it was your that figured out that Dan Rather fiasco and singlehandedly stopped Gore from stealing the election in 2000.
First you say that "Sarah could be a powerful media draw"--as if she isn't---And then you go on to say when she appeared on one of the Main Stream News morning shows, "She caused GMA to murder The Today Show in the ratings"
Yeah too bad she isn't a powerful media draw, imnagine what would have happened if that were true.
I am on Sarah's side and I am very much not on the side of the GOPe and Fox News. The elites have done Sarah dirty.
As are you with your clever little "nuances."
Don't worry, we are not smart enough to figure you out.
Ten days you have been here, and you want to train us? LOL!
Fyi ping.
That's a winning combination to restore traditional American values: Two unabashed Christian Conservatives supporting God, guns, life and liberty.
FYI, this is posted on her Facebook page as well, not just on Twitchy.
:-)
You are one conceited arrogant jerk. Have you always been this way? Does it take much effort or is it something that comes easily to snob noobie trolls such as yourself?
First you say that "Sarah could be a powerful media draw"--as if she isn't---And then you go on to say when she appeared on one of the Main Stream News morning shows, "She caused GMA to murder The Today Show in the ratings"
Of course she is a powerful media draw, that was the point.
This thread is about Sarah having to take Twitter to call our Rubio on Amnesty.
At the present time,no one is employing her media drawing power because she does not have the favored position on Amnesty which is held by ALL the media elites.
Fox News is scared of her power, that is why they have hired her back, and kept away from prime time and discussing Amnesty.
If Amnesty passes, I am sure that we will see a lot more of Sarah on the Fox News Channel and in prime time.
Fox News Channel has pulled out the stops for Amnesty.
Rubio appears almost exclusively on Hannity.
Bill O' Reilly threw in with Gang of Eight.
Huckabee gave an interview to the Washington Post endorsing amnesty.
And Sarah has to take to Twitter to take on Rubio, because NO ONE is taking on Rubio on the Fox News Channel at least during prime time.
An entire 10 days to insult and school us dummy FReepers Sync!!! The DUmp breathlessly waits for their sleeper troll to return and report back to them on what it has learned here.
You be old school. You like to flame. I thought all the flamers and the haters had migrated to the social networks. My bad.
Hooray for Sarah,she will tell it like it is!I have a feeling the war on RINOS is just beginning a new era.
Great post Jim! I have been looking for an answer as to why supposed conservatives like Rubio would sell us out and all I can come up with is,corruption, payoffs, campaign contributions and the like. Traitors for hire is pretty close.
Is that right? Well, isn't FR blessed and fortunate to have you? /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.