Posted on 06/23/2013 12:04:00 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Sarah Palin @SarahPalinUSA:
Politicians wonder why we can't trust them? Campaign flip-flops like this and carve-out bribes in the Amnesty... http://fb.me/2IsL1uspC
Palins tweet links to a story from TownHall.com detailing Sen. Marco Rubios (D-Fla.) flip-flop over amnesty for illegal immigrants.
During a debate with opponents Rep. Kendrick Meek and Gov. Charlie Crist, candidate Rubio argued that giving illegal immigrants an earned path to citizenship, which Crist, Sen. John McCain and former President George W. Bush had advocated, is basically amnesty.
Rubio, who won that 2010 election, is now the leading Republican in the U.S. Congress pushing for illegal aliens to be given the earned path to citizenship that he himself insisted was code for amnesty only three years ago
(Excerpt) Read more at twitchy.com ...
This is the food chain from top to bottom. NWO=Newscorp=Rupert Murdoch=Roger Ailes=Tokyo Rove=Sarah Palin
Sarah is not in a position to make demands of a powerful media elite joined at the hip with the GOPe.
They do not need Sarah all that much, if they did they would feature her on prime time.
They are using her and she has the opportunity to use them a bit as well.
Using her Twitter to expose Rubio, shows that she will not be muzzled by them, but ultimately boys like Ailes land Rove have all the power because they determine when and where she will appear on Fox News and what will be the general topic of discussion.
Palin didn’t get fired, and you don’t have the details about her leaving although you are posting your claimed ones.
What is this, your 11th day here and already you are laying it on thick?
WTF are you talking about?
Except Rubio was a Bush family property back to his FL days. He’s a long-time faker.
Sarah’s right.
West for Senate!
I remember when George Bush told us......see you at the signing. Made me want to spit every time I saw his face on tv.
I refused to vote for McCain because of his traitorous amnesty support. I will vote for noone who supports amnesty. If they are for amnesty they are against Americans.....period.
WRONG! She never sought them out and she can't be bought and they know it. They want viewership. After all, you say they can get anyone - so why SARAH?
They do not need Sarah all that much, if they did they would feature her on prime time.
DUH!! They don't want her in prime time - what's wrong with you.
have all the power because they determine when and where she will appear on Fox News and what will be the general topic of discussion.
That's not having power - Power is when you speak EVERYONE LISTENS and that's SARAH even when using her Twitter !
Can't because Marco's Establishment rich-boy sponsors won't hire Americans. They'd have to pay real wages. Why do that when you can hire an illegal for so much less (illegally)?
This is one reason I believe that the penalty for hiring illegals should include jail time. No matter how big you make the fine, the Establishment boys will just keep doing it and passing the cost along to us.
Or more? I figured she wanted to wait until the last of the kids (except Trig, of course) was out of the house.
Not strictly accurate, perhaps, but correct. He’s following in Charlie Crist’s footsteps.
I realize that I am taking a nuanced position beyond the grasp of many on this forum.
I am on Sarah's side and I am very much not on the side of the GOPe and Fox News. The elites have done Sarah dirty.
Sarah could be a powerful media draw but she does not espouse the corporate media elite party line and no network other than Fox will hire her.
Since she doesn't march in lockstep with the GOPe and Tokyo Rove, Fox will hire her but never feature her on a topic such as Amnesty. If Amnesty becomes a done deal, we may see more of her.
When she wasn't renewed on Fox, she appeared on Good Morning America opposite a relaunch on the Today Show. She caused GMA to murder The Today Show in the ratings.
But the Disney Cartel who owns ABC has a political agenda and Sarah doesn't fit even though if she were to appear a couple of times a week on a network morning show, she would make them a consistent winner.
And there are bumper stickers too.
As sweet as that dig at FR and freepers is for a guy who just signed up 11 days ago, for what we assume is the first time, you ignored my post to you.
Palin didnt get fired, and you dont have the details about her leaving although you are posting your claimed ones, you were making stuff up, that is not nuance.
That is what I said. I did not say that she got fired. I said in effect she got fired.
That is called a nuance.
She did not get fired, but not renewing one's contract has the some effect.
In sports and show business it happens all the time because networks and sports ownership do not want to anger viewers and fans which pay the bills in media and sports.
It is called plausible deniability. Non-renewal gives them cleaner hands.
Palin was not fired, not renewing ones contract is not fired.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.