That is what I said. I did not say that she got fired. I said in effect she got fired.
That is called a nuance.
She did not get fired, but not renewing one's contract has the some effect.
In sports and show business it happens all the time because networks and sports ownership do not want to anger viewers and fans which pay the bills in media and sports.
It is called plausible deniability. Non-renewal gives them cleaner hands.
You sure paint some pretty pictures.
You went out of your way to declare her as fired while posting to Eva, and you described why she was fired and said that you didn't think it was for the single act of insubordination, but because of her not taking her talking points from Karl Rove, although she wasn't fired and you don't actually know why she left Fox news at all.
You then insulted freerepublic and freepers.
Great start, and that leaves out that you have a man "pleasuring" another.
Fwiw, your idea of nuanced thinking seems to be guessing what happened (pretending you "know" works too), then claiming your (really pretty bad) guess is some kind of fact.
You might want to rethink the idee of your superiority before your next post...........