Posted on 06/01/2013 10:34:19 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
IAWTP.
It is reported that 75% of the NY Times Editorial Staff is homosexual. Obama is their champion.
Most of the remaining dominant media is controlled by the Left.
Also note that reporters don’t have Mike Zullo’s investigative information access or they are not allowed to use it by their superiors.
It only takes one Obama plant inside a major media outlet in a position of authority to silence the rest of the organization.
Undoubtedly many reporters don’t want to go out on a limb and experience the trap that Dan Rather fell in. I believe Rush is in this category. But as Mike Zullo continues to connect all the dots, eventually the dam will break and the media will come forward.
Total bullshit is right...
You must have a different Constitution or can’t read.
12th Amendment, Section 3 addresses the death and replacement of President elect. What the hell, I thought only the liberals had the authority to change the Constitution to match their hair-brained ideas.
See the 25th Amendment.
A rare but as usual interesting Zero’s Background Ping. Please note Cold Case Posse Supporter’s comment (and the other stuff):
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3026175/posts?page=25#25
“The Cold Case Posse even went so far on public record to state that it can not be confirmed that Stanley Ann Dunham is Barack Obama’s mother.”
Now we’re cooking with gas, as my old mother used to say.
Oh, forgot to add:
If anyone wants on/off Zero’s Background ping list, freepmail me.
I’m tempted to, but I won’t.
So I’ll just repeat myself.
No one knows for certain who his father is. No one knows for certain who his mother is. No one knows for certain where or when he was born.
Start from there.
By proving without a shadow of a doubt that Zero’s birth documentation is forged, Zullo and Arpaio open the door to several questions, that any rational thinking person would ask, if they want to think rationally:
1. Why were they forged?
2. Was there some info on his real birth documents he wanted to hide?
3. Was it date of birth (as long as he was 35 when he ran, no need for that alone)?
4. Was it place of birth?
5. Was it mother?
6. Was it father?
7. Was it birth name?
That about covers it. But it’s clear that probably most or all of the “info” on the forged documents is fake. If some was accurate, they woudln’t have needed to create an entirely new document. Just fix a little bit here or there; but they had to create an entirely new document; which implies that all of the info on it is made up.
Once is circumstance, twice is a coincidence, three times is enemy action.
I think Obama using sarcasm has stated/talked about his Kenyan birth as reported by others. His remarks are typical of a bald faced con guy who can at any appropriate time for any given purpose make a comment to hide a fact. The method is used all the time by insincere despots.
You know my answer.
The first time you see Stanley Ann Dunham with zero is in 1963 at the zoo.
Somewhere in the US, the two boys were photographed together.
The boy Barack Hussein Obama 11 went to Kenya with his father in 1964.
“Homeland Security stole all the ammo and there would be inter agency rivalry over possession thereof.”
Hmm, well then, maybe there is hope! A turf war between Homeland Security and the IRS! Couldn’t hope for anything better than that :) !
No argument with your post. The problem is that no one “with standing” has even attempted to bring civil or criminal suit against nobama for eligibility issues or fraud or criminality.
Considering the very narrow political window of “Standing”, its highly unlikely any civil or criminal suits will get beyond the first Judge.
As Rush said, “this President will never be impeached” for any reasons, because of politics. Sometimes it better to just recognize the futility and to work diligently to discover other more practical effective ways to thwart the tsunami of liberal horse doo brought on by no one in Congress objecting to his eligibility in 2008 or 2012 Electoral College certifications.
Thank you!
It is past time we should recognize the futility of banging our heads against the wall and find some way to change the law, Constitutionally or through the States, to prevent another similar situation from potentially destroying our great country.
See post 193.
Figured I better ping “smoking something” too, although its unlikely to penetrate to previously unfound regions of understanding.
You know, you’ve really got some nerve.
You berate me for posting an exhaustive article about the situation by a constitutional attorney and demand I give you facts without referencing somebody else’s words (which I did).
Then you ping me to a post by a known OBOT TROLL. His links have repeatedly been debunked and dismantled by many over hundreds of past threads from non-binding opinions from judges who use the bogus “standing” issue to state rulings that have no ability to overrule the Constitution.
I don’t have time to go over all his trash but you would be wise to know who you are agreeing with (Obama minions) who have a vested interest in this massive CRIMINAL USURPATION.
So put up or shut up. IN YOUR OWN THOUGHTS AND WORDS (as you so belligerently demanded of me) prove your point “that taking the oath of office” magically turns a usurper into a LEGAL president.
I want to see passages from the Constitution.
P.S.
As, an aside, Dr. Edwin Vieria also addresses the bogus “standing” issue in the article you still haven’t read.
Dr. Edwin Vieira
Unbelievable. The members of the Fogbow website are digging into Mr. Reed Hayes personal life and his personal financial background and publishing it online for everyone to see. How low can the scum over there get?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.