See post 193.
Figured I better ping “smoking something” too, although its unlikely to penetrate to previously unfound regions of understanding.
You know, you’ve really got some nerve.
You berate me for posting an exhaustive article about the situation by a constitutional attorney and demand I give you facts without referencing somebody else’s words (which I did).
Then you ping me to a post by a known OBOT TROLL. His links have repeatedly been debunked and dismantled by many over hundreds of past threads from non-binding opinions from judges who use the bogus “standing” issue to state rulings that have no ability to overrule the Constitution.
I don’t have time to go over all his trash but you would be wise to know who you are agreeing with (Obama minions) who have a vested interest in this massive CRIMINAL USURPATION.
So put up or shut up. IN YOUR OWN THOUGHTS AND WORDS (as you so belligerently demanded of me) prove your point “that taking the oath of office” magically turns a usurper into a LEGAL president.
I want to see passages from the Constitution.
P.S.
As, an aside, Dr. Edwin Vieria also addresses the bogus “standing” issue in the article you still haven’t read.