The changing background means that if the original existed physically then it must have been printed on plain white paper.
Did various attorneys and other individuals copy this plain white COLB onto on a variety of security papers? Why?
Did various attorneys and other individuals scan this plain white COLB and electronically insert images of various security papers? Why?
Did the document ever exist physically or is it an electronic assemblage?
How can the background change?
What is the chain of custody of the "COLB" document proffered by the Alabama Democrat Party? Is the Alabama Democrat Party attempting fraud upon the Court?
That’s what is so laughable about the AL Dem Party’s amicus brief: it doesn’t even ATTEMPT to say what those documents really are or where they came from. By having a different background it sure seems like they are trying to imply that this came from a document other than the PDF. Seems like they may be setting the stage to claim that this is how HDOH-issued copies look when photocopied - as if the AL Dem Party was given a genuine BC and it was photocopied to be put on Scribd.
What I can say is that the basic cross-hatch security background on all of Obama’s long-form images is easily recognized as not having come from the HDOH, when you realize what a page of the HDOH’s basic security pattern really looks like.
The forged COLB was made from a real HDOH-issued COLB. They only had a few lines to change (the BC# and the note of an evidence file for the late and altered filing) and could easily paste in the cross-hatches to cover for the print they deleted and/or changed). On the long-form, however, they botched it because they had to recreate the whole layer, and did it just like you did - with no context to show them that they had it screwed up.
“Did the document ever exist physically or is it an electronic assemblage?”
No and Yes, if Zullo’s certified digital document laboratory report concludes what he claims it concludes.
The “tells” are piled on “tells” all meant to create plausible deniability and/or the necessity for another hearing and then another until (Barry’s legal team hopes) Barry leaves office.
By October 15, two weeks after the Barrycare exchange premiums arrive in mailboxes, Barry will be the most reviled president in US history and even his owm party will be ready to throw him under the bus, IMO.
The Chicago Commie Cartel for whom Barry is a sock-puppet get angry and vicious at Barry when he screws up and they are faced with losing power...like they did after Barry blew the first debate. They were livid then and they will be even more livid soon.
They MUST recapture the House and a 60 vote filibuster proof margin in the Senate to have any hope of “fixing” Barrycare and then pushing Hilarious in 2016 to maintain the gravy-train for the Dems. They will dump Barry and muddle through with Biden if Barry looks like he is going down.
Have you seen this:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3014484/posts
So Klayman submitted a copy of the LFBC pdf from whitehouse.gov., The Democratic Party of Alabama submitted a copy of the LFBC (no diamond pattern) and then there is the diamond pattern LFBC on Jack Ryan’s scribd.com account.
Is the diamond pattern just a watermark like “Friends of the Fogbow.com”?