That’s what is so laughable about the AL Dem Party’s amicus brief: it doesn’t even ATTEMPT to say what those documents really are or where they came from. By having a different background it sure seems like they are trying to imply that this came from a document other than the PDF. Seems like they may be setting the stage to claim that this is how HDOH-issued copies look when photocopied - as if the AL Dem Party was given a genuine BC and it was photocopied to be put on Scribd.
What I can say is that the basic cross-hatch security background on all of Obama’s long-form images is easily recognized as not having come from the HDOH, when you realize what a page of the HDOH’s basic security pattern really looks like.
The forged COLB was made from a real HDOH-issued COLB. They only had a few lines to change (the BC# and the note of an evidence file for the late and altered filing) and could easily paste in the cross-hatches to cover for the print they deleted and/or changed). On the long-form, however, they botched it because they had to recreate the whole layer, and did it just like you did - with no context to show them that they had it screwed up.
My main concern about the Amicus brief is that it is designed to fool the unwary, TV watching person.
In theory Judges are supposed not to have any detailed knowledge or opinion on a case before they hear it and consider what is in front of them only.