[KentuckyTim]

What are your thoughts?

[EternalVigilance]

No.

[Jim Robinson]

NO AMNESTY PUSHERS!!

[US Navy Vet]

If Rand get his head screwed on straight about “Immigration” and cuts out the anti-Semite and Isolationist crap then I would back him.

[SoldierDad]

Not going to happen, Randmesty!!!

[Orangedog]

He would probably be somewhat better than someone like say, gingrich, who has about as much respect for the constitution as a high school quarterback has for his drunk prom date.

[DJ MacWoW]

“If the moral character of a people once degenerate, their political character must soon follow…..These considerations should lead to an attentive solitude…to be religiously careful in our choice of all public officers…. and judge of the tree by its fruits.” Elias Boudinot - Patriot

Click The Pic

Support Conservatism, Donate. Monthly If You Can

[elkfersupper]

Fine.

Exactly what this nation needs.

[Fred]

How about we attempt to get some solid legislation passed before Rand goes all Obama on us...

[Cyman]

I say no to ANYONE announcing a run for President more than 1 year in advance.

[Ray76]

NO!

[DoughtyOne]

You know, there are some things I like about Rand. What bothers me is that all too many people I am tempted to support, have no problem at all selling us out on one issue or another.

Politicians, if you support anything even remotely resembling amnesty and or other rewards for sneaking across our borders, you have just labeled yourself an anti-American.

Sorry Rand. I can’t support anti-Americans.

[Sans-Culotte]

[zerosix]

Not in my books and in my case, I have to sign on to the GOP candidate due to my position with the party but I can't imagine supporting this or any candidate standing for any form of Amnesty nor further gun grabbing laws.

No grass roots support for either, in fact, just the opposite!

[Fred]

How about we focus on TAKING BACK the senate in 2014???? The 2016 election is a waste of time at this point.

[Girlene]

He has potential. His views on illegals are concerning.

[Gator113]

I just watched his latest campaign ad and while I think it’s catchy, I just don’t think it’s convincing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdIev12fCPs

So, no thanks.

[Notary Sojac]

"No Amnesty Pushers!!!"

And we really mean it this time, not like when we all said "No Romneys!!!!"

[Bikkuri]

Nope.. no way.. No more Libertarians on our ticket.

[drypowder]

at least he's eligible to be the president, unlike the current fraud in the WH thus proving elections are rigged and don't mean squat. A lot can happen between now and 2016.

[2big2fail]

I’m behind Rand, even including his non-interventionalist foreign policy (not the same as isolationist, mind you)and some sort of amnesty program.

Non-interventionalism has more of an historical basis in the US than the present policy of long-term occupation / nation-building. We can’t afford it, it is not appreciated, it costs us lives and others the lives of innocents, and begats big government encroachments most of us despise like the anti-Constitutional provisions of the Patriot Act and the surveillance and electronic eavesdropping programs, the Kill List, and the whole Perpetual War Police State apparatus. A nation at war can never be fully free. And “War is the Health of the State.”

With regard to immigration, I object to illegal immigration mostly because it is so disrespectful to those who have gone through the legal process. But outside of that, I have no objection, and believe an amnesty process to be a practical solution. Remember this: when we all get riled up about illegals getting on welfare and the like, we are really railing against the welfare state. If you truly believe that no man has the right to the income of another, then you can concede that an illegal has no more or less right to your income than some dude born inside the US border in El Paso. In the abscence of our greatest enemy, in the context of a truly free Republic, there would be no need to define who is “legal” or “illegal.”