Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All Of This Whining And Crying About The Sequester Shows Why America Is Doomed
TEC ^ | 03/02/2013 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 03/03/2013 6:47:39 AM PST by SeekAndFind

CryingIf we can't even cut federal spending by 2.4 percent without much of the country throwing an absolute hissy fit, then what hope does America have? All of this whining and crying about the sequester is absolutely disgraceful. The truth is that even if the sequester goes into effect, the U.S. government will still take in more money than ever before in 2013 and it will still spend more money than ever before in 2013. So it is a bit disingenuous to call what is about to happen "a spending cut", but for the sake of argument let's concede that point. Even if the budget really was being "cut" by 85 billion dollars, that only would only amount to a "cut" of 2.4 percent to federal spending. It would barely make a dent in the federal budget deficit for 2013. The U.S. government would still accumulate about as much new debt in fiscal year 2013 as it did in all the years from the inauguration of George Washington to the inauguration of Ronald Reagan combined. Our debt to GDP ratio would continue to soar. The sequester cuts would essentially only be a minor bump on the road to financial oblivion. But if you listen to Barack Obama and his allies, they would have you believe that we are facing a great national crisis because of these impending cuts. They would have you believe that hundreds of thousands of people will lose their jobs and that many government agencies will no longer be able to operate effectively. They would have you believe that "granny won't get her lunch" and "roofs blown off by Hurricane Sandy won't get repaired". Well, if all of that is true, then what in the world would our country look like if we actually cut a trillion dollars from the federal budget this year and started living within our means?

Have you ever known people that are already hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt and yet go out and regularly blow thousands more dollars on wild shopping sprees?

Such debt addicts may be very proud of their new homes, their new cars, their new clothes and all of their fancy electronic gadgets, but it was all purchased with debt. When a "day of reckoning" finally arrives, many debt addicts lose absolutely everything and end up in the street.

That is what America is like today.

Our politicians like to show off all of the stuff that our government is spending money on, but the truth is that we are spending gigantic mountains of money that we simply do not have. We are literally stealing from our kids and our grandkids so that we can continue to enjoy a massively inflated standard of living that we have not earned.

But we can't stop ourselves. Americans are absolutely addicted to big government. They want a gigantic government that sends out free money to more than 100 million Americans every month, but they absolutely do not want to pay for it. They would rather steal money from their children and their grandchildren to pay for it.

This has got to stop, because we are literally destroying the future of this country.

If Americans really want a massively bloated government that takes care of everyone from the cradle to the grave then they should pay for it.

If Americans don't want to pay for it, then they should reduce the size of the government to a level where they are willing to pay for it.

But stealing money from future generations of Americans to pay our bills is absolutely disgraceful.

As I talked about in a previous article, we are stealing more than 100 million dollars from our children and our grandchildren every single hour of every single day.

Is there anyone out there that is willing to stand up and defend that kind of theft?

But the vast majority of Americans don't want to do anything to stop it, because they don't want to harm "the economy" (i.e. our ridiculously bloated standard of living).

Will the sequester cuts hurt the economy a bit?

Of course.

Government spending cuts always hurt the economy.

If we raised taxes to help pay the bills that the federal government has been racking up, would that hurt the economy?

Of course.

Tax increases always hurt the economy.

But if we continue on the path that we are today, America is doomed.

The U.S. national debt is the biggest single debt in the history of the world. It is now more than 16.6 trillion dollars, and it has gotten more than 23 times larger since Jimmy Carter first entered the White House.

If our politicians suddenly decided to go to a balanced budget today, our debt-fueled "bubble economy" would disappear and we would immediately plunge into a deep economic depression.

Do the American people have the character to be able to handle that kind of an "adjustment" to our standard of living?

Of course not.

That is why so many of our politicians are scared to death of doing anything about the debt.

And even these small sequester "cuts" are freaking everyone out. Many of our politicians and many in the mainstream media are openly declaring that "the sky is falling". Just check out the following short excerpt from a recent New York Times article...

The owner of a Missouri smokehouse that makes beef jerky is worried about a slowdown in food safety inspections. A Montana school district is drawing up a list of teachers who could face layoffs. Officials at an Arizona border station fear that lines to cross the border could lengthen. And if Olympic National Park in Washington cannot hire enough workers to plow backcountry trails, they may stay closed until the snow melts in July.

But that is nothing compared to what others are saying. CNN is declaring that if the sequester cuts happen, "granny won't get her lunch" and "roofs blown off by Hurricane Sandy won't get repaired".

And check out these ominous warnings from Barack Obama about what will happen if the sequester cuts go into effect...

"Emergency responders like the ones who are here today -- their ability to help communities respond to and recover from disasters will be degraded. Border Patrol agents will see their hours reduced. FBI agents will be furloughed. Federal prosecutors will have to close cases and let criminals go. Air traffic controllers and airport security will see cutbacks, which means more delays at airports across the country. Thousands of teachers and educators will be laid off. Tens of thousands of parents will have to scramble to find childcare for their kids. Hundreds of thousands of Americans will lose access to primary care and preventive care like flu vaccinations and cancer screenings."

The Obama administration has even decided to release hundreds of illegal immigrants in anticipation of the cuts...

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have released “several hundred” immigrants from deportation centers across the country, saying the move is an effort to cut costs ahead of budget cuts due to hit later this week.

Announcing the news Tuesday, ICE officials said that the immigrants were released under supervision and continue to face deportation. After reviewing hundreds of cases, those released were considered low-risk and “noncriminal,” officials said.

The claims about the sequester cuts just seem to get more ridiculous with each passing day. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is warning that the cuts will make the U.S. more vulnerable to terrorist attacks, and Obama recently decided not to send an aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf because of "budget concerns".

Apparently he sees no problem with using the U.S. military to score political points.

And Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says that the budget cuts will result in "less actual deficit reduction in the short run".

Really?

How stupid do they think we all are?

Yes, the sequester cuts will have an impact on the economy, but they won't cause the sky to fall.

The following is what the CBO says the economic impact of the cuts is likely to be...

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the cuts will cost 750,000 jobs and hit growth by 0.6 percentage points, assuming the cuts remain in effect for the remainder of the fiscal year. Some economists expect a slightly bigger impact.

Remember, these are actually very small cuts.

In fact, according to U.S. Representative Lynn Jenkins, the U.S. government will actually be spending more money in 2013 than it did in 2012 even if the sequester cuts go into effect...

“There’s a fact that says we are going to take in more money this fiscal year than we have ever taken in before,” Jenkins said. “The budget this year, we will spend more money this year than we spent last year even if the sequester goes into effect. We will spend more money even if the sequester goes into effect.”

So why is everyone whining and crying over such a very small amount of money?

If you want to get upset about something, why not get upset about things that are increasing our debt by trillions of dollars?

For example, according to a Government Accountability Office report that was just released, Obamacare is going to cause the federal debt to rise by $6.2 trillion.

Why aren't more people getting upset over that?

Sadly, it is because America is a debt addict. Most Americans don't really care much when federal spending skyrockets out of control, but if anyone tries to slow down the spending a little bit they throw hissy fits.

And please don't tell me that "the big government Republicans" are much better than "the big government Democrats" on budget issues. The Republicans have caved in and have gone along with all of this wild spending every single time.

On March 27th, they will have another opportunity to do something. That is when the current continuing resolution expires.

At that time, the Republicans could refuse to pass anything but a balanced budget.

Or they could at least refuse to pass anything except a budget that would cut the federal budget deficit in half.

But they won't do anything once again. They will cave in and go along with the status quo because they are cowards.

So we will continue to rip off future generations to fuel our current bloated standard of living.

Thomas Jefferson understood that government borrowing is theft from future generations. He once made the following statement....

And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.

Shame on you Democrats.

Shame on you Republicans.

Shame on you America.

You are destroying the future of America for your own selfish reasons.

If future generations get the chance, they will look back on what you did to them and they will curse you for it.

For much more on our exploding national debt, please see the following article: "55 Facts About The Debt And U.S. Government Finances That Every American Voter Should Know".

Not that living within our means would be easy.

Like I said, it would mean a deep economic depression, and it would also likely mean a tremendous amount of societal chaos.

Even now, while we are still living in the boom times, things are really starting to get crazy out there. Just check out what is going on in Oakland...

Oakland’s crime problems have gotten so bad that some people aren’t even bothering to call the cops anymore; instead, they’re trying to solve and prevent crimes themselves.

KPIX 5 cameras caught up with a half dozen neighbors in East Oakland’s Arcadia Park neighborhood Monday as they walked the streets on the lookout for crime. The vigilance has never seemed more necessary than now; 25 homes in the neighborhood have been burglarized over the last two months alone.

In a neighborhood that has started to feel like the wild west, people have even started posting “wanted” signs.

“You have to walk around in your house with a gun to feel safe here,” said Alaska Tarvins of the Arcadia Park Board of Directors.

If this is how bad things are now, how bad will they be when a day of reckoning for our economy arrives?

And a day of reckoning is coming.

Our politicians can try to keep kicking the can down the road for as long as they can, but eventually time will run out. Just take a look at what is happening in Greece and Spain. Meanwhile, all of this can kicking is just making the eventual crisis even worse.

We can borrow our way to prosperity for a while, but in the end there is always a very bitter price to pay for doing so.

I would love to tell you that there is a chance that all of this will be turned around, but the truth is that all of this whining and crying about the sequester shows that America is doomed.

I hope that you are getting ready.

Cry



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Society
KEYWORDS: sequester; sequestration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: SeekAndFind

“This has got to stop, because we are literally destroying the future of this country.”

Not gonna happen. Just keep buying food and ammo.


41 posted on 03/03/2013 9:10:06 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"If we actually cut a trillion dollars from the federal budget this year and started living within our means?"

Hey if your family was short of 'means' you wouldn't put your family on cat food and throw grandma off the bridge. You would find another way to increase your means. Tariffs works for me on these boatloads of tax-free goods.

42 posted on 03/03/2013 9:21:20 AM PST by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HogsBreath
I have no doubt that very small group of determined communists have a plan in place to (attempt) to take power.

Huh? That small group of determined Communists you speak of, already pulled off their coup in 2008. We're living under their dictatorship now.

43 posted on 03/03/2013 10:04:04 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

Why would anyone think that exile of individuals that have no interest in and are unwilling to support the aims and objectives of the locality where he resides is the definition of a “dictatorship”?

Low-information voters are by definition those who have no interest in and no support for the aims and ideals that founded the country they found themselves in.


44 posted on 03/03/2013 10:04:45 AM PST by alloysteel (What is all too obvious, is not obvious to all. Until it is too late to reverse course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101

Cuts, reductions...what else can you name it as other than what it really is?


45 posted on 03/03/2013 10:09:15 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

So what would Obama and the Dems be kidnapping or hijacking?


46 posted on 03/03/2013 10:11:01 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

The gloves are still on. It will take riots or something similar to get ‘real’ communism. Night arrests, road blocks, travel papers, charges for thought crimes, etc.


47 posted on 03/03/2013 10:31:54 AM PST by HogsBreath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The "Greece syndrom" has finally hit the US.

Every cut will now be demogogued by the liberals/commies just as they were in Greece.

48 posted on 03/03/2013 10:40:42 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HogsBreath
It will take riots or something similar to get ‘real’ communism. Night arrests, road blocks, travel papers, charges for thought crimes, etc.

They'll never pull that off without disarming the citizens first. Good luck with that.

49 posted on 03/03/2013 10:40:42 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso; alloysteel

alloysteel wrote:
“Low-information voters in the “red” region would be exiled, forcibly if necessary, to one of the “blue” republics.”

And Misterioso replied:
“So. the ‘solution’ is a dictatorship? That’s what’s coming but there is no way to predict what life will be like for us.”

I’ve posted for quite some time here on FR about a possible breakup of America into several “red” and “blue” areas.

I’ve also posted about how with the continuing “polarization” of the nation, we will see an increasing migration of citizens (of both red and blue persuasions) towards the areas that will best serve them.

I can’t say whether “dictatorship” is a solution, but there will certainly need to be some “strong coercion” to persuade “those of the blue” (i.e., the “low-information” types) that their lot would be better off in the blue areas. Such cooercion could include the removal of ALL “benefits” to which they may now “entitled”, perhaps even providing a “transportation stipend” and “papers out”. Remember that after a separation, we will no longer be “one nation”, but several nations, with real “international borders” between.

Misterioso, you really don’t expect that we could somehow magically transform those “low-information voters and benefit consumers” into productive citizens, do you?
Well… do you?


50 posted on 03/03/2013 10:46:32 AM PST by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

RE: Do you not fathom these facts, or are you just being disingenuous?

I appreciate this fact that you mentioned. However, let me ask you this, SHOULD THE MILITARY BE TOTALLY EXEMPT FROM CUTS?

Let’s say that Operations and Maintenance should not be cut, are you telling me that unlike other government programs, there is no FAT and WASTE going on in Defense?


51 posted on 03/03/2013 12:25:01 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
. . . forcibly if necessary . . .

Works for me as a definition.

52 posted on 03/03/2013 12:48:22 PM PST by Misterioso (The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So what would Obama and the Dems be kidnapping or hijacking?

They are acting like kidnappers. They are holding the country hostage, demanding payment (no budget cuts) from the citizens, and threatening to harm the nation (military, DHS, border, etc.) if they don't get their demands.

53 posted on 03/03/2013 8:14:58 PM PST by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I appreciate the cordial reply as well. Thank you.

To answer the question, no, the DoD should not be exempt. In fact, the DoD is the only Federal agency that has been cut in real dollars in the past several years. Not "baseline budget" gimmick cuts either - real cuts. Thousands of jobs were lost, hundreds of thousands of soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen are going to be thrown out of the service that they scarificed and sometimes literally bled for.

That in itself is an obscenity.

Can the DoD be cut even more. Yes, but not this way. Not with Sequestration. It is the worst possible approach for the military.

Moreover, it is a Constitutional institution. Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Food Stamps, TANF (all of which are exempt from Sequestration) are not Constitutional.

I understand the anger towards the government. Every time a obese TSA agent with the IQ of 65 touches a member of my family at an airport, I weep for what this country has become.

However, there are also the noble. There are DoD teachers, nurses, logisticians, machinists, electricians, dog handlers, engineers, and truck drivers who are loyal, patriotic, hard working Americans who are hurt by this process.

Read this - it is true.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2992388/posts?page=40#40

Every time you mock and scoff, you mock and scoff the likes of her. She isn't ficticious.

Think about it more before you post.

54 posted on 03/04/2013 3:30:45 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

See here:

http://www.businessinsider.com/2012-us-defense-budget-largest-since-world-war-ii-2011-7

The FY 2012 budget requests a total of $676 billion for the Department of Defense (DoD).

The base budget for DoD includes $553 billion in discretionary funding and $5 billion in mandatory funding, and an additional $118 billion is requested for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The budget request also includes $19 billion for defense-related atomic energy programs and $8 billion for defense-related activities in other agencies, bringing the total national defense budget to $703 billion.

Adjusting for inflation, the level of funding proposed for the base defense budget in the FY 2012 request is the highest level since World War II, surpassing the Cold War peak of $531 billion (in FY 2012 dollars) reached in FY 1985.

So, Defense has a budget of nearly $676 Billion dollars.

Sequester for this fiscal year is a mere $44 Billion ( because much of the months for this fiscal year have already gone ).

Of the $44 Billion, HALF is defense cuts, which comes out to $22 Billion.

If you subtract that from $676 Billion, that’s still $654 Billion dollars. GREATER THAN the 20 most powerful military in the world combined!

Don’t tell me that the DoD cannot work with that number and has to cut to the bone and lay off all these good people you mentioned.... What about doing a serious accounting and cutting the FAT.

Every agency from top to bottom has to do it.

Now, if your main concern is that defense gets the BULK of the cuts compared to the other government departments, I get your point.

However, WE HAVE TO START SOMEWHERE.

We’re not going to even get a good start with a Democrat controlled Senate and this man in the White House.

If a good start means cutting a mere $22 Billion from a nearly $680 Billion budget ( because we have been dealt a lemon in November 2012 ), then so be it.

A really competent head would know how to find $22 Billion in waste to cut.


55 posted on 03/04/2013 6:57:26 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

And as if to soothe your fears, The new Continuing Resolution will include a provision that restores $7 billion in funding for specific Pentagon accounts:

House Republicans are proposing this week to restore upward of $7 billion to operations and maintenance accounts for the four military services hit hard by the automatic cuts that went into effect Friday night.

That’s the bottom line driving a hybrid spending bill to be unveiled Monday and intended to replace the stopgap continuing resolution or CR due to expire March 27.

The measure will keep in place the overall spending reduction known as the sequester ordered Friday. But in the case of the Defense Department, it substitutes an updated full-year budget that shifts money to address the GOP’s great Achilles’ heel: the serious danger to military readiness if the standoff with President Barack Obama drags on for months.

Republicans know they can’t sustain a long fight without addressing this vulnerability, but the CR is also a political tinderbox that could blow up despite all sides now insisting that they want to avoid a government shutdown.

SEE HERE:

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/house-continuing-resolution-to-restore-7b-to-defense-88344.html

Now, the cuts for this fiscal year will be a mere $15 Billion. $15 billion is a mere 2.2% of $676 Billion.

Don’t tell me out of a nearly $676 Budget, they can’t find 2.2% in cuts....


56 posted on 03/04/2013 7:51:40 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I saw that article today.

I'll believe it when I see it.

First of all, the proposal only attempts to stop the bleeding caused by the CR by adding in O&M funds, which combined with the $487 Billion in cuts starting in 2011 on top of the Sequester dictating a 13% cut, has sent the Pentagon reeling.

The article acknowledges this fact. I have been shouting this from the rooftops at FR for weeks now, and I have been shouted down. The very thread this is posted on (your thread!) attempts to minimize the horrible effects of Sequestration, and yet you send me this article which affirms everything I have been saying.

Next, the Democrats are not going to allow the Congress to restore funds only to the DoD - they will wand AIDS reserach and everything under the sun funded as well. Watch.

The O&M restoration will stop some bleeding, but the Pentagon still will "owe" $46 Billion from Sequestration no matter how this is sliced. That means readiness is still gutted, hundreds of thousands of furloughs, installations closed, TRICARE for military and families still underfunded, DoD school teachers furloughed (saw that approved just today), and on, and on, and on.

The late "mea culpa" by the Republicans is nothing but an acknowlegement that they sacrificed Defense on the altar with the Faustian bargain of the 2011 Budget Control Agreement.

Isn't it great when the husband who beat his wife last Sunday apologizes on Monday morning when he sobers up? Well, a half apology in this case.

Sequestration has to stop for the DoD. It is a Constitutional enterprise.

The military can, and will cut. It already has. But when North Korea or some other hotspot explodes, our political masters will thrown our volunteer men and women in uniform into the trench in a heartbeat.

Crazy Joe Biden threatened Iran with military force.....this morning! Great Joe. Just great.

You and what Army?

57 posted on 03/04/2013 2:18:22 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
House GOP Spending Plan Continues Sequester, Federal Pay Freeze

Notice the operative words: "Continues Sequester."

The proposal is only a hopeful bandaid for the gaping wound the GOP allowed to be inflicted on the military.

Not to mention that they Democrats will never allow only DoD to recieve more funds without strings attached to their pet programs.

In other words - more of the same gridlock.

58 posted on 03/04/2013 2:54:19 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I’m still interested in finding out HOW MUCH CAN BE CUT FROM THE MILITARY.

You and I both agree that there’s a lot of waste going on. So how many percent realistically can we cut from a $680 Billion a year budget assuming we had the political will to do so.


59 posted on 03/04/2013 2:57:24 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson