Uh, how would the sheriff know which houses to “inspect” annually? Does washington state have weapons registration? Which will, of course, stop all criminal activity. At least that is what the radical left wing extremist liberal demokkkrat scumbags claim. Still waiting for them to explain how any of this crap will reduce/hinder/stop criminal activity. Crickets!
> Who is writing all these laws for the demoRats to pass?
Soros comes to mind.
1 Any assault weapon relinquished pursuant to this subsection shall be 2 destroyed; 3 (b) The transfer of any assault weapon by a licensed manufacture 4 or dealer to a law enforcement agency in this state for use by that 5 agency or its employees for law enforcement purposes; 6 (c) The possession of an assault weapon that was legally possessed 7 on the effective date of this section, but only if the person legally 8 possessing the assault weapon has complied with all of the requirements 9 of subsection (5) of this section; 10 (d) The possession of an assault weapon that has been permanently 11 disabled so that it is incapable of discharging a projectile. 12 (4) Subsection (2) of this section shall not apply to any person: 13 (a) while lawfully engaged in shooting at a duly licensed, lawfully 14 operated shooting range; 15 (b) While lawfully participating in a sporting events officially 16 sanctioned by a club or organization established in whole or in part 17 for the purpose of sponsoring sport shooting events. 18 (5) In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was 19 legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person 20 possessing the assault weapon shall do all of following: 21 (a) Safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of 22 the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to 23 ensure compliance with this subsection; [Emphasis Added by Stanwooddave] 24 (b) Possess the assault weapon only on property owned or 25 immediately controlled by the person, or while engaged in the legal use 26 of the assault weapon at a duly licensed firing range, or while 27 traveling to or from either of these locations for the purpose of 28 engaging in the legal use of the assault weapon, provided that the 29 assault weapon is stored unloaded and in a separate locked container 30 during transport. 31 (6) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, any person 32 in this state who, after the effective date of this section, acquires 33 title to an assault weapon by inheritance, bequest, or succession, 34 shall, within thirty days of acquiring title, do one of the following: 35 (a) Comply with all of the requirements of subsection (5) of this 36 section; 37 (b) Dispose of the assault weapon pursuant to subsection (3) (a) of 38 this section; or p. 7 SB 5737 The under signed declares under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, and the laws of the United States of America 18 U.S.C. § 1621 & § 1746 and The State of Washington “FALSE SWEARING” (R.C.W. 9A. 72.040), that the above statement(s)/ content (Except Formatting) are true and correct to the best of Affiant’s knowledge, Executed this 21st, day of February, 2013, at Stanwood, Washington.
SS//Stanwooddave
The same wording as was on bill SB 6396, Pg 7, of SB 6396, Line(s) 19 thru 21.
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2009‑10/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Bills/6396.pdf
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Letter(s) to the Editor:
I read Danny Westneat’s Feb. 16th column in The Seattle Times titled “Slip-up may slam doors on gun law,” [NWSunday, Feb. 17] and became quite concerned. There was no mistake in the bill (SB 5737), which was sponsored by Sens. Ed Murray, Jeanne Kohl-Welles and Kline. The column reads: “I spoke to two of the sponsors. One, Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, a lawyer who typically is hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues, said he did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on. ‘I made a mistake,’ Kline said. ‘I frankly should have vetted this more closely.’” In the 2010 legislative session, Kline was the primary sponsor of SB 6396.
[Link: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2009-10/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Bills/6396.pdf] This is virtually identical to the current bill he has attached himself to as a co-sponsor. It contains the exact same section calling for sheriff inspections of homes [Page 7, lines 19-21]. It was not inserted into this current bill from a staffer, as claimed in the column. It was there in the beginning. With two sponsors of identical bills in separate years we are lead to believe that they didn’t know the provision was in there. Come on, wake up and tell the truth. --Billy Don Card Jr., Wenatchee
///////////////////////////////////////////////////
Senator's Kline and Kohl-Welles sponsored SB 5475-2005 and 6396-2010; both bills would have permitted the local sheriff's to
perform unannounced inspections of resident’s homes without a warrant.
The same wording as was on bill SB 6396, Pg 7, of SB 6396, Line(s) 19 thru 21. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2009
Handgun Control, Inc., The Brady Campaign, The Gabby Giffords Campaign, you name it.....any frigging, money grubbing liberal you can find - or even some group that thinks they can make a buck off control implementation (consultation, oversight, etc.)....